FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-20-2007, 03:53 AM   #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1
Default Made in God's image?

Greetings,
Im a long time fan of the boards, first time poster.
A topic that has always bothered me about the bible is that we are supposedly made in God's image. Does this mean that God has nipples and a belly button? Does God have reproductive organs? If so then what questions does this raise? Please share your views..
Pariah2000 is offline  
Old 03-20-2007, 04:10 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: America
Posts: 1,377
Default

The obvious answer is that we made him in our image.

Given the cultural forces that shaped him, that's why he's a man, and misogynistic, and vengeful, and petty, and violent, and jealous, and violent,
and compulsive. And violent.
patchy is offline  
Old 03-20-2007, 04:24 AM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: denver
Posts: 11,319
Default

I think there is many different discussions on it since rabbis have had several thousand years to try to come up with some meaning

1) Image doesn't mean what we think of it and it's really the sould and not physical image, and I think Christians portray it this way.

I think two things happened, one an editing error from the editors trying to merge a polytheistic view as they became more monotheistic (borowed traditions). And two they did mean in a human image on the basis that most religions made gods either half human half beast, all beast, or after some natural thing so the original myth creators just said that God(s) is in human form like Zeus.

Mike
coloradoatheist is offline  
Old 03-20-2007, 12:29 PM   #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Springfield, Il
Posts: 2
Default

it is not a made in God's image in the physical sense. it is seen as a made in Gods image from the perspective of his traits like jealousy, compassion, anger, sadness, and more. so he doesn't have a belly button he is transcendent.
sehrhardt is offline  
Old 03-20-2007, 12:29 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Darwin, Australia
Posts: 874
Default

Gary Greenberg's Myth #11 in 101 Myths of the Bible says that the Hebrew tradition of God creating "man in his image" derives ultimately from an adaption of an Egyptian myth.

What happened when the great He-She made us in 'his' own image is that we turned out "male and female" -- what else can we expect from an androgynous (originally egyptian) deity?


Neil Godfrey

http://vridar.wordpress.com
neilgodfrey is offline  
Old 03-20-2007, 02:11 PM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 10,955
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pariah2000 View Post
Greetings,
Im a long time fan of the boards, first time poster.
A topic that has always bothered me about the bible is that we are supposedly made in God's image. Does this mean that God has nipples and a belly button? Does God have reproductive organs? If so then what questions does this raise? Please share your views..
I think in the context it means God is a moral being, and he made humans as moral beings, with free will.

That's what Genesis 1 and 2 seem to be about, after all.
Gamera is offline  
Old 03-20-2007, 06:04 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pariah2000 View Post
Greetings,
Im a long time fan of the boards, first time poster.
A topic that has always bothered me about the bible is that we are supposedly made in God's image. Does this mean that God has nipples and a belly button? Does God have reproductive organs? If so then what questions does this raise? Please share your views..
One important fact that is sometimes overlooked is that the text doesn't say that humans are just made in God's image, but that they are made in the image and likeness of God and whomever God was talking to--the "us" and "our" of Genesis 1:26:

Quote:
26 Then God said, "Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth."
Who are the "us" and "our"? Appeal is often made to 1 Kings 22:19, which speaks of "Yahweh siting on his throne, with all the host of heaven standing beside him" or Job 1:6, which mentions "heavenly beings" or "sons of God," presumably angels, who present themselves before Yahweh. I think that these are valid points, so we must ask ourselves what it means to be made in the image and likeness of an angel. Although I don't deny that authority from God could be a part of the "image" of God, I think that bodily form is also in mind. There are various places which speak of God's having body parts (Genesis 3:8; Exodus 24:10; Zechariah 14:4; Isaiah 6:1; Genesis 18:1-2 ff, et al) and the same is said of angels (Daniel 9:21; Genesis 6:1-4; Genesis 18-19; Judges 6:11 ff et al). Genesis 18 is especially informative, as it mentions three "men" who visited, and ate with, Abraham, and were Yahweh and two angels (cf. 18:33 and 19:1).
John Kesler is offline  
Old 03-20-2007, 06:36 PM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 10,955
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Kesler View Post
Although I don't deny that authority from God could be a part of the "image" of God, I think that bodily form is also in mind. There are various places which speak of God's having body parts (Genesis 3:8; Exodus 24:10; Zechariah 14:4; Isaiah 6:1; Genesis 18:1-2 ff, et al) and the same is said of angels (Daniel 9:21; Genesis 6:1-4; Genesis 18-19; Judges 6:11 ff et al). Genesis 18 is especially informative, as it mentions three "men" who visited, and ate with, Abraham, and were Yahweh and two angels (cf. 18:33 and 19:1).
Well, the Hebrew scriptures also describe God as a rock, a refuge and the sun and a shield. Clearly these are metaphors, and it suggests any reference to God's limbs are metaphorical too. He appears as a man in Genesis 18, but also as a burning bush and a pillar of cloud and pillar of fire, which suggest none of these are his "true" form, which appears to be beyond comprehension.

Hence the theme in the Hebrew scriptures that if you really "see" God you'll die.

Genesis 16:13 - So she called the name of the LORD who spoke to her, "Thou art a God of seeing"; for she said, "Have I really seen God and remained alive after seeing him?"

Genesis 32:30 - So Jacob called the name of the place Peni'el, saying, "For I have seen God face to face, and yet my life is preserved."

Deuteronomy 5:24 - and you said, 'Behold, the LORD our God has shown us his glory and greatness, and we have heard his voice out of the midst of the fire; we have this day seen God speak with man and man still live.

Judges 13:22 - And Mano'ah said to his wife, "We shall surely die, for we have seen God."

For what it's worth, this nonhumanoid version is Jesus' reading of the OT: John 4:24 - God is spirit,
Gamera is offline  
Old 03-20-2007, 07:22 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamera View Post
Well, the Hebrew scriptures also describe God as a rock, a refuge and the sun and a shield. Clearly these are metaphors...
You have answered your own objection, because as you say, it is clear when metaphorical language is being used. We may today describe people as rocks and refuges, and it is just as clear that such language is not to be taken literally.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamera
... and it suggests any reference to God's limbs are metaphorical too.
This is a non sequitur and begged question.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamera
He appears as a man in Genesis 18, but also as a burning bush and a pillar of cloud and pillar of fire, which suggest none of these are his "true" form, which appears to be beyond comprehension.
You are again taking an all-or-nothing approach. And one of your proof-texts below is an interesting choice:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamera
Genesis 32:30 - So Jacob called the name of the place Peni'el, saying, "For I have seen God face to face, and yet my life is preserved."
Here is the fuller context:

Quote:
4 Jacob was left alone; and a man wrestled with him until daybreak. 25 When the man saw that he did not prevail against Jacob, he struck him on the hip socket; and Jacob's hip was put out of joint as he wrestled with him. 26 Then he said, "Let me go, for the day is breaking." But Jacob said, "I will not let you go, unless you bless me." 27 So he said to him, "What is your name?" And he said, "Jacob." 28 Then the man said, "You shall no longer be called Jacob, but Israel, for you have striven with God and with humans, and have prevailed." 29 Then Jacob asked him, "Please tell me your name." But he said, "Why is it that you ask my name?" And there he blessed him. 30 So Jacob called the place Peniel, saying, "For I have seen God face to face, and yet my life is preserved."
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamera
For what it's worth, this nonhumanoid version is Jesus' reading of the OT: John 4:24 - God is spirit,
Where does this passage say that being "spirit" equals being incorporeal? And even if being "spirit" and having a body were somehow incompatible, all this would show is another contradiction in the Bible.
John Kesler is offline  
Old 03-20-2007, 09:36 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Darwin, Australia
Posts: 874
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamera View Post
I think in the context it means God is a moral being, and he made humans as moral beings, with free will.

That's what Genesis 1 and 2 seem to be about, after all.
This is the sophisticated explanation for those who need to justify hanging on the story. But I see nothing in the story about morality. Wisdom and knowledge yes. "Knowing" (= experiencing?) good and evil, yes. It's not obvious that those things have anything to do with our preoccupations with free will or ethics.

The bit about being made in his image (really 'our image' which can be taken as either a plural of majesty for one being or an indication of a collection of deities as i understand it) is in the context of creating a caretaker (who turns out to be plural) for his brand new creation. Someone was needed to "subdue" it to keep it habitable and their payment was free feed. The obvious creature to create for this purpose would be one in the creator's image. -- to signify that he was the boss over all the other creatures shaped differently. No morality or free will issues at all.

So what were the issues preoccupying those who produced these sorts of stories?

Neil Godfrey

http://vridar.wordpress.com
neilgodfrey is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:24 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.