Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-20-2007, 03:53 AM | #1 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1
|
Made in God's image?
Greetings,
Im a long time fan of the boards, first time poster. A topic that has always bothered me about the bible is that we are supposedly made in God's image. Does this mean that God has nipples and a belly button? Does God have reproductive organs? If so then what questions does this raise? Please share your views.. |
03-20-2007, 04:10 AM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: America
Posts: 1,377
|
The obvious answer is that we made him in our image.
Given the cultural forces that shaped him, that's why he's a man, and misogynistic, and vengeful, and petty, and violent, and jealous, and violent, and compulsive. And violent. |
03-20-2007, 04:24 AM | #3 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: denver
Posts: 11,319
|
I think there is many different discussions on it since rabbis have had several thousand years to try to come up with some meaning
1) Image doesn't mean what we think of it and it's really the sould and not physical image, and I think Christians portray it this way. I think two things happened, one an editing error from the editors trying to merge a polytheistic view as they became more monotheistic (borowed traditions). And two they did mean in a human image on the basis that most religions made gods either half human half beast, all beast, or after some natural thing so the original myth creators just said that God(s) is in human form like Zeus. Mike |
03-20-2007, 12:29 PM | #4 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Springfield, Il
Posts: 2
|
it is not a made in God's image in the physical sense. it is seen as a made in Gods image from the perspective of his traits like jealousy, compassion, anger, sadness, and more. so he doesn't have a belly button he is transcendent.
|
03-20-2007, 12:29 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Darwin, Australia
Posts: 874
|
Gary Greenberg's Myth #11 in 101 Myths of the Bible says that the Hebrew tradition of God creating "man in his image" derives ultimately from an adaption of an Egyptian myth.
What happened when the great He-She made us in 'his' own image is that we turned out "male and female" -- what else can we expect from an androgynous (originally egyptian) deity? Neil Godfrey http://vridar.wordpress.com |
03-20-2007, 02:11 PM | #6 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 10,955
|
Quote:
That's what Genesis 1 and 2 seem to be about, after all. |
|
03-20-2007, 06:04 PM | #7 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,037
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
03-20-2007, 06:36 PM | #8 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 10,955
|
Quote:
Hence the theme in the Hebrew scriptures that if you really "see" God you'll die. Genesis 16:13 - So she called the name of the LORD who spoke to her, "Thou art a God of seeing"; for she said, "Have I really seen God and remained alive after seeing him?" Genesis 32:30 - So Jacob called the name of the place Peni'el, saying, "For I have seen God face to face, and yet my life is preserved." Deuteronomy 5:24 - and you said, 'Behold, the LORD our God has shown us his glory and greatness, and we have heard his voice out of the midst of the fire; we have this day seen God speak with man and man still live. Judges 13:22 - And Mano'ah said to his wife, "We shall surely die, for we have seen God." For what it's worth, this nonhumanoid version is Jesus' reading of the OT: John 4:24 - God is spirit, |
|
03-20-2007, 07:22 PM | #9 | ||||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,037
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||
03-20-2007, 09:36 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Darwin, Australia
Posts: 874
|
Quote:
The bit about being made in his image (really 'our image' which can be taken as either a plural of majesty for one being or an indication of a collection of deities as i understand it) is in the context of creating a caretaker (who turns out to be plural) for his brand new creation. Someone was needed to "subdue" it to keep it habitable and their payment was free feed. The obvious creature to create for this purpose would be one in the creator's image. -- to signify that he was the boss over all the other creatures shaped differently. No morality or free will issues at all. So what were the issues preoccupying those who produced these sorts of stories? Neil Godfrey http://vridar.wordpress.com |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|