![]()  | 
	
		Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#21 | |
| 
			
			 Banned 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2005 
				Location: Queens, NY 
				
				
					Posts: 2,293
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
     Anyway, its not so much how one defines "parthenogenesis", the simple fact is that a non-supernatural partho-type birth in mammals produces a female child. And actually the whole issue is quite fascinating and important. You can see Orthodox_Freethinker give a different viewpoint, one where Miriam's genetic relationship to Messiah is that of simply an implant/incubator or surrogate mother, no genetic contribution. Surprisingly, there are some "Protestants" with this view, and even among Pentecostals this idea (a major error, imho) spread recently in Ethiopia, under the teachings of a man named Teklemarian. The other view is that of the Roman Catholics (and I thought many Orthodox), where they approach the question as one of Miriam having a special type of nature, as in the "immaculate conception" doctrines. Ergo Messiah can be sinless, at the expense of doing violence to the prophetic line of the seed of David, and His true humanity through Miriam. What I shared with you above, (and I enjoyed reviewing my notes, and look forward to reading some of the references as well.. especially the books at bottom) is really in my view the only fully consistent and beautiful understanding. Those who read the Arthur Custance material will get a better picture. Shalom, Steven Avery http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Messianic_Apologetic  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#22 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2004 
				Location: Transylvania (a real place in Romania ) and France 
				
				
					Posts: 2,914
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 But does not that mean that Mary was not faithfull to her husband, and had a relation with the Holy Ghost? She broke the law, or more exactly God broke the law!  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#23 | |
| 
			
			 Regular Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Dec 2002 
				Location: Chicago 
				
				
					Posts: 351
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#24 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: May 2005 
				Location: On  an  icefloe off the  atlantic  coast of Canada 
				
				
					Posts: 1,095
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			There 's  gotta be  a simpler  solution to the  enigma ! 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	I , personnaly , think that the good ole archangel Gabriel did more than announce to Mary that she was gonna be mother of god' son , he visited her ! Whether it was in the contract or not . A while back I read a book ( can't remember which one ) where Mary ,because of her lineage , was in a school where the teachers who were from the line of the great priest Elijah , took the name of archangels . When the girls became of age , they were visited by their teacher ( in Mary's case her teacher 's name was Gabriel ) and when pregnant the girls were then married to rich unmarried men or widowers ,like Joseph for Mary . Does anyone know the name of the book or the author ?  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#25 | |
| 
			
			 Banned 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2005 
				Location: Queens, NY 
				
				
					Posts: 2,293
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Shalom, Steven Avery http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Messianic_Apologetic  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#26 | |
| 
			
			 Regular Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Dec 2005 
				Location: London, United States of Europe. 
				
				
					Posts: 172
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
		
  |