Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-04-2008, 01:50 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 49
|
Evidence contradicting the conquest of Canaan
A few weeks ago, I mentioned to a fundamentalist that Canaan could not have been conquered by Joshua and the other Hebrews because most of the cities were already uninhabited. I mentioned Ai as one example. The fundamentalist said Ai simply means ruins and maybe the Ai that archaelogists have excavated is not the same place that Joshua conquered. He said that the same is true of the other places such as Jericho, Bethel, Heshbon, Gibeon, Gaza, Hazor, Lachish. How confident are archaelogists that they have been digging in the right places? I believe this guy was full of crap but I didn't know enough about Canaanite archaeology to be able to refute what he said.
|
06-04-2008, 06:25 PM | #2 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
|
Quote:
Quote:
For the time being, if I were confronting an apologist making that argument, I would challenge him to produce whatever evidence he had that the experts were wrong. Properly used, there is nothing wrong with an appeal to authority. Authorities can be wrong, but when someone who is not an authority claims that, on a particular issue within their expertise, they actually are wrong, then it's up to that someone to show the rest of us exactly where their mistake lies and how they came to make it. |
||
06-04-2008, 06:45 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Alabama
Posts: 649
|
As with most questions a good start would be a visit to your local library. You should be able to find most of what you need in a short time and you can read up on the subject as your time allows.
Baal |
06-04-2008, 07:07 PM | #4 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
|
06-05-2008, 07:54 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
Posts: 748
|
Well, we know that fundamentalists think biologists don't know squat about the history of life or astronomers about the formation of the universe or geologists about the formation and development of the earth, so I guess it shouldn't come as a surprise that they think archaeologists don't know anything about the history of Canaan.
It's astonishing just how many intelligent professionals in all these fields would have to be wrong for the bible and its followers to be right. Maybe someday they will come to the conclusion that, just perhaps, it is THEY who are wrong. One can always hope but I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for that time. |
06-05-2008, 09:28 PM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NAS Atlanta
Posts: 2,104
|
I certainly do hate the fact that I can have a good understanding of how something works and the christian I'm debating can just make particulars up that I can't verify as wrong so he wins by default. I'm smart, not omniscient.
|
06-05-2008, 11:34 PM | #7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
It is his responsibility to substantiate his assertions, not yours. He is shifting the burden and you are allowing him to do so.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|