Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-02-2005, 02:22 PM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,890
|
NT word of God
Can people show me where in the New Testament it reaffirms that the Bible is the word of God, please?
|
04-02-2005, 02:41 PM | #2 |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 171
|
Do the first few verses of the book of John count?
|
04-02-2005, 03:09 PM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
"All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:" (2 Tim 3:16)
|
04-02-2005, 04:57 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 562
|
The intro to Luke seems to suppose that his version is authoritative, though it says nothing of Inspiration.
|
04-02-2005, 05:32 PM | #6 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
But the author of Luke only claims that he researched prior material, not that he was inspired by God to write the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
Quote:
|
|
04-02-2005, 05:55 PM | #7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
|
If we accept Timothy's statement as proof, then don't we have to determine what he meant by "scripture?" Does it include the Koran, the Rig Veda, Science and Health and the Key to the Scriptures?
I almost forgot Joseph Smith's golden tablets. Wouldn't they qualify as scripture? |
04-02-2005, 06:17 PM | #8 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Scripture means "writing" but it has the implication of "holy writing" or "holy writing per my religion."
The early Christians tended to use "Scripture" to refer to the Jewish holy writings. They didn't know about the Rig Veda or the scriptures to come, including the Qur'an, the Book of Moroni, or, for that matter, the New Testament, which had not been canonized at the time that the Epistle to Timothy was written. Which brings us back to the question in the OP. I would submit that the NT does not state that it is the word of God. |
04-03-2005, 12:57 AM | #9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
|
Quote:
I have a theory that when protestants rejected the authority of Rome they were forced to suggest that they instead relied upon the "very word of God". They insisted they had a superior authority, but one can't have this unless what they have is trustworthy. |
|
04-03-2005, 04:51 AM | #10 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Well, depending on if the author of Luke-Acts wrote the Pastorals, then there's a good chance that 2 Timothy 3:16 was both a self reference to the authoritative history written by himself and the verse just in disguise of Paul (much like Marcion's actions regarding the Pauline text and his Euaggelion) and also a development of his "quote" of Paul in Acts about worshipping the unknown god, i.e. all things, not just then deemed holy writings, but literally everything is from God in some sense including pagan writings, which was often echoed later in the admiration of such wisdom endowed Greeks as Socrates who some Christians viewed as being inspired by the Universal Logos aka Christ aka Ho Theos.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|