FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-15-2009, 06:54 PM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default Wiki decision regarding Emperor Julian, the last pagan emperor

On the talk page for Julian, currently "Julian the Apostate", there is an attempt to change the article name to the emperor's real name, "Flavius Claudius Julianus". I was hoping that some people from here might participate in the decision. All you have to do is go to the talk page and add your choice, either "oppose" or "support", by editing the section.

There have been several attempts to change the name of the article.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 03-15-2009, 08:07 PM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Thanks spin, have added a comment to the survey.
mountainman is offline  
Old 03-17-2009, 08:17 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Nazareth
Posts: 2,357
Default

JW:
Only for you Spin:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ju...9_.28part_2.29



Joseph

http://www.errancywiki.com/index.php/Main_Page
JoeWallack is offline  
Old 03-17-2009, 02:12 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
At any rate, the Council of Ephesus, in a decree dated 431, sentenced Porphyry's books to be burned, but did not mention Julian's; and again in a law of Theodosius II. in 448, Julian was ignored while Porphyry was condemned. When in 529 Justinian decreed that anti-Christian books were to be burned, Porphyry alone was named, though probably Julian was meant to be included.
http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/ju...ns_0_intro.htm

Just wondering - do we have a very biased set of references about xianity from these centuries?
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 03-17-2009, 05:08 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Posts: 7,984
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
On the talk page for Julian, currently "Julian the Apostate", there is an attempt to change the article name to the emperor's real name, "Flavius Claudius Julianus".
That makes no sense: 1. Why would English Wikipedia have the entry using the Latin name? 2. Would anyone actually search for "Flavius Claudius Julianus"? If the requested name change was to "Roman Emperor Julian", perhaps, but the present request is absurd.
figuer is offline  
Old 03-17-2009, 05:29 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 76
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by figuer View Post
Why would English Wikipedia have the entry using the Latin name?
Because it is not a pejorative.

Quote:
Originally Posted by figuer View Post
2. Would anyone actually search for "Flavius Claudius Julianus"?
They don't have to; Wiki would redirect "Julian the Apostate" to "Flavius Claudius Julianus."
jon-eli is offline  
Old 03-17-2009, 08:57 PM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle View Post
http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/ju...ns_0_intro.htm

Just wondering - do we have a very biased set of references about xianity from these centuries?
Totally and demonstratively "biased and ill-informed".
Take for example the opening claim.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WRIGHT
Julian, like Epictetus, always calls the Christians Galilaeans
This is totally wrong. Epictetus never mentions anything to do with "galilaeans" as "christians" but follows the useage of Josephus who does not refer to christians at all, but in fact refers to the galilaeans as the lawless tribes of jewish rebels and gangsters who hang out in the "bad lands" and refused to pay ribute to those nice Roman overlords. Nothing whatseoever to do with "christainity" or "christians".

Wilmer Cave WRIGHT, PH.D, is wrong.

Julian invented the term "Galilaeans" in the fourth century so that he could legally change the name of the "christains" to something else. His use of the term is the precedent in antiquity. IMO it was meant to represent his conception of "the new and strange religion" [Eusebius] and the "Plain and simple religion of the christians" [Ammianus] as lawless tribes of jewish (LXX carrying) rebels and gangsters who hang out in the "basilicas" and refused to pay tribute to those nice Greek overlords of philosophy, religion, mathematics, geometry, poetry and their conceptions of "divinity", and the entire set of heavily Hellenistic traditions which the Roman empire had assumed -- and preserved -- until Constantine.
mountainman is offline  
Old 03-17-2009, 09:03 PM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

BULLBURNER is better nickname than APOSTATE
mountainman is offline  
Old 03-18-2009, 12:29 PM   #9
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeWallack View Post
Yeah, thanks for the effort, Joe. I'm sure you love the process of dealing with Wiki apologists. As much as me.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 03-18-2009, 12:31 PM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by figuer View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
On the talk page for Julian, currently "Julian the Apostate", there is an attempt to change the article name to the emperor's real name, "Flavius Claudius Julianus".
That makes no sense: 1. Why would English Wikipedia have the entry using the Latin name? 2. Would anyone actually search for "Flavius Claudius Julianus"? If the requested name change was to "Roman Emperor Julian", perhaps, but the present request is absurd.
What is the name of the Wiki article for Geta??


spin
spin is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:26 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.