Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-15-2009, 06:54 PM | #1 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Wiki decision regarding Emperor Julian, the last pagan emperor
On the talk page for Julian, currently "Julian the Apostate", there is an attempt to change the article name to the emperor's real name, "Flavius Claudius Julianus". I was hoping that some people from here might participate in the decision. All you have to do is go to the talk page and add your choice, either "oppose" or "support", by editing the section.
There have been several attempts to change the name of the article. spin |
03-15-2009, 08:07 PM | #2 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Thanks spin, have added a comment to the survey.
|
03-17-2009, 08:17 AM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Nazareth
Posts: 2,357
|
JW:
Only for you Spin: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ju...9_.28part_2.29 Joseph http://www.errancywiki.com/index.php/Main_Page |
03-17-2009, 02:12 PM | #4 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Quote:
Just wondering - do we have a very biased set of references about xianity from these centuries? |
|
03-17-2009, 05:08 PM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Posts: 7,984
|
That makes no sense: 1. Why would English Wikipedia have the entry using the Latin name? 2. Would anyone actually search for "Flavius Claudius Julianus"? If the requested name change was to "Roman Emperor Julian", perhaps, but the present request is absurd.
|
03-17-2009, 05:29 PM | #6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 76
|
Because it is not a pejorative.
They don't have to; Wiki would redirect "Julian the Apostate" to "Flavius Claudius Julianus." |
03-17-2009, 08:57 PM | #7 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Quote:
Take for example the opening claim. Quote:
Wilmer Cave WRIGHT, PH.D, is wrong. Julian invented the term "Galilaeans" in the fourth century so that he could legally change the name of the "christains" to something else. His use of the term is the precedent in antiquity. IMO it was meant to represent his conception of "the new and strange religion" [Eusebius] and the "Plain and simple religion of the christians" [Ammianus] as lawless tribes of jewish (LXX carrying) rebels and gangsters who hang out in the "basilicas" and refused to pay tribute to those nice Greek overlords of philosophy, religion, mathematics, geometry, poetry and their conceptions of "divinity", and the entire set of heavily Hellenistic traditions which the Roman empire had assumed -- and preserved -- until Constantine. |
||
03-17-2009, 09:03 PM | #8 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
BULLBURNER is better nickname than APOSTATE
|
03-18-2009, 12:29 PM | #9 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
spin |
|
03-18-2009, 12:31 PM | #10 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
spin |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|