Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-11-2009, 11:19 AM | #1 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
|
Jesus Hybrid Christ?
In another messageboard, I once created a poll on the nature of Jesus Christ, and I entered the traditional Xian position as "God-man hybrid".
Some people complained that's not quite what traditional Xian theology states about him, but it seemed to me that those complaints are based on an excessively narrow use of the word "hybrid". But being "fully God and fully man" seems like having a hybrid nature to me, as does having God as his biological father and a woman as his biological mother. I think that those complainers were reacting to the word "hybrid", even though I chose that word rather than "half-breed" or "mongrel" or "mutt" because it seemed like the most dignified choice of words. Interestingly, there's a Xian site that embraces that word: The hybrid nature of our Lord Jesus Christ |
05-11-2009, 11:38 AM | #2 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
|
05-11-2009, 11:47 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 9,159
|
the trinity excites such marvelous gesticulations. Logically ridiculous, and any description of it lacking sufficient deference to God is held in contempt.
Logically, God is either one thing or all things. If he can choose to be three things that are all the same thing then it follows he can be all things and still be one thing. I think recently he has chosen to appear on some pieces of toast, in fact. |
05-11-2009, 12:28 PM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dancing
Posts: 9,940
|
|
05-11-2009, 01:14 PM | #5 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
So that's what the H stands for in Jesus H Christ!
|
05-11-2009, 01:50 PM | #6 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
http://www.freeratio.org/showthread.php?t=189955
Frankenstein's Monster And somewhere there is something about model jesi. |
05-11-2009, 05:12 PM | #7 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Quote:
"similar essence" and "same essence." They were part of a controversy in Christianity during the 4th century when people disagreed over the nature of God and his relationship to Toast. According to those who adopted homoiousios, Toast was not the same as God but simply had a "similar essence." eg: Arius of Alexandria According to those who argued for homoousios, the doctrine which was eventually adopted as orthodoxy, Toast and God had the exact same essence and one was not permitted to differentiate any further, since this "critical questioning of Socrates was a menace to the state". Despite excessive anachronism my vote is that the H stands for Hobbit. |
|
05-14-2009, 09:08 AM | #8 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Fully god and fully man is xian math : 1+1=1!
There was a UK advert for cadbury's milk chocolate - " a glass and a half in every bar" so is the xian slogan really an early advertising slogan? Our god is better than yours - its fully god and fully man! Actually, maybe we could improve it further - a Ferrari god? Give the man bit some better brakes or a bigger... A new religion based on "go to work on an egg"? Quote:
Quote:
I would definitely add research into advertising into the development of religions - are hymns the equivalent of us humming a tune from an advert? |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|