Sign Related

Criticism against the bible vs criticism against the bible reader...

The better reader criticism against the biblical criticism, is summing up in the following quotes from Rev 22 (a catch 22 even so):

"...God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:"

"...and from the things which are written in this book:"

"...and of them which keep the sayings of this book:"

"Seal not the sayings of the prophecy of this book:"


Those quotes imply continuation in writing and continuation in sayings. Meaning, the books of the Book been not complete from point of origination. Meaning, sayings are coming further than both just the standard verbalization by mouth way and the standard written by hand way (like with a pen, a pencile, or a computer typewriting function). Also meaning, sayings on the matters, or on the non-standard verbalization, should fly rather than be shut up as if it's blasphemy to dare shead sunlight (even a metaphysical moonlight). Plus, it means one shouldn't knock the modern versions of the books in the bible just because of such are not the original language or text. You give the books in the bible book a confining life sentence when you let not the continuation exceed and exceed differently and newly from inside the whole out the clear blue category.

Do any even agree to the better reader criticism dethroning the long lived biblical criticism? If not, then what is the better biblical criticism yet-to-date?

Sign Related

Example even:

"Revelation" (or "The book of Revelation") is books with an "s", says versions and personal copies for buyers or gift accepters. The thing not seeable is the "stacking tone" implying upon the word "book" in the quotes since the word "are" plus "written" plus "in this" produce an affectiveness concerning the word "book". One may write in a book which is already out by adding further versions (of even further details). And adding on copies of a first, original book work is still a writing in the same "topic" book (no matter the name). When one takes on writing further in a topic or to a version of (or the original of), say, "Revelation", then indeed the continual writing is going in such topic (whatever "this" is to get named or been already known by a previous referrence) book. And dont hold out on "this" implying even an extra page addition to the book since even the word "this" points first to the page it is on before pointing to the word "book" next to it. Maybe four extra pages to "Revelation" are (or are coming) in some different ways beyond being what a "book" is. Hey, may freely be four living, walking human pages, since we know cant be a page without an indivudal Of authorship ("this") or Of material construction ("this").

O, and even title variations aids the point. "Revelation by St. John the divine", "The Book of Revelation by St. John the divine", etc.