FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-10-2007, 03:10 PM   #191
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancaster, CA.
Posts: 96
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bible John View Post
Its time to dust off my feet and leave.



John
Nothing like cutting and running when your argument is full of holes...
notapadawan is offline  
Old 08-10-2007, 03:24 PM   #192
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SF Bay Area California
Posts: 834
Default Apology to my opponent Notapadawan and iidb.org

I wish to apologize for my unchrist conduct and statements made in a recent post. I truly was not thinking and I did feel guilty about the statement, but I did not delete it. My predecessor Jason Gastrich set a poor example for Christians as a whole, and I bet that many of you guys are watching us Christians very carefully after having experienced him, and I apologize for also setting a bad example.

My opponent is a brother in the Lord, and I should not have made such inflammatory remarks as I did. I am greatly sorry.

I am reading the Truth War (or via: amazon.co.uk) at this time, and getting really excited about some weapons to aid me in the War on Terror. I should not have spoken to a brother in the Lord the way that I did.


Sincerely,


John Wolf
Church Education Resource Ministries
www.cerm.info
Bible John is offline  
Old 08-11-2007, 12:42 PM   #193
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bible John
I wish to apologize for my unchrist conduct and statements made in a recent post. I truly was not thinking and I did feel guilty about the statement, but I did not delete it. My predecessor Jason Gastrich set a poor example for Christians as a whole, and I bet that many of you guys are watching us Christians very carefully after having experienced him, and I apologize for also setting a bad example.

My opponent is a brother in the Lord, and I should not have made such inflammatory remarks as I did. I am greatly sorry.

I am reading the Truth War at this time, and getting really excited about some weapons to aid me in the War on Terror. I should not have spoken to a brother in the Lord the way that I did.

Sincerely,

John Wolf
Church Education Resource Ministries
www.cerm.info
I congratulate you for making your apology, and for making apologies before. However, I, and a lot of other people, are still waiting for you to defend inerrancy. How can an inerrantist ever expect to get anywhere without defending inerrancy? At the General Religious Discussions Forum, you said that the Bible is inerrant because it says that it is inerrant, and that was basically all that you said. Do you really expect to get anywhere with a comment like that?

May I ask what difference it makes which version of the Bible is best if the Bible cannot be trusted?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 08-11-2007, 07:21 PM   #194
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancaster, CA.
Posts: 96
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bible John View Post
I wish to apologize for my unchrist conduct and statements made in a recent post. I truly was not thinking and I did feel guilty about the statement, but I did not delete it. My predecessor Jason Gastrich set a poor example for Christians as a whole, and I bet that many of you guys are watching us Christians very carefully after having experienced him, and I apologize for also setting a bad example.

My opponent is a brother in the Lord, and I should not have made such inflammatory remarks as I did. I am greatly sorry.

I am reading the Truth War at this time, and getting really excited about some weapons to aid me in the War on Terror. I should not have spoken to a brother in the Lord the way that I did.


Sincerely,


John Wolf
Church Education Resource Ministries
www.cerm.info
No need to apologize. Let's just keep the discussion centered on the issues and not the posters.
notapadawan is offline  
Old 08-17-2007, 12:40 PM   #195
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SF Bay Area California
Posts: 834
Default

Quote:
No need to apologize. Let's just keep the discussion centered on the issues and not the posters.
I dont think there will ever be an agreement between you and me on this issue and why I think that possibly debating with you further on it is fruitless.


John
Bible John is offline  
Old 08-20-2007, 09:33 AM   #196
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancaster, CA.
Posts: 96
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bible John View Post
I dont think there will ever be an agreement between you and me on this issue and why I think that possibly debating with you further on it is fruitless.


John
You sure are a funny guy... You were so hoping I'd join the discussion ,and I did. Then you presented an argument you assumed would silence me, which it didn't. Now you can't figure out how to debate the issue and so naturally you cut and run. It's ok. Buh-bye...
notapadawan is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:33 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.