FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-28-2006, 01:30 PM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A pale blue oblate spheroid.
Posts: 20,351
Default The Bible: Not Scientifically Accurate

If the Bible is scientifically accurate on all points, and is the one and only truth of how the universe was created,

Why doesn't it mention DNA, if it is the truth? Surely if it were scientific fact the ancient people would've understood it as well?
GenesisNemesis is offline  
Old 07-28-2006, 01:33 PM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Death Panel District 9
Posts: 20,921
Default

Who says the Bible is scientifically accurate? Or precise?
Nice Squirrel is offline  
Old 07-28-2006, 01:34 PM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A pale blue oblate spheroid.
Posts: 20,351
Default

Creationists, of course.
GenesisNemesis is offline  
Old 07-28-2006, 01:53 PM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Jupiter
Posts: 98
Default

Playing devil's advocate here, I would ask why would God feel a need to include DNA or any other science knowledge in a book meant to guide peoples spiritual lives.

More to the point, although the bible is not a science textbook, it DOES try to answer questions about nature that science has sought to answer. These often disagree to varying extents.

We could ask: Considering the author of the bible is all-knowing, then when the bible explains phenomenon in nature why is it often wrong?
Senlatheil is offline  
Old 07-28-2006, 02:11 PM   #5
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 5,310
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Senlatheil
Playing devil's advocate here, I would ask why would God feel a need to include DNA or any other science knowledge in a book meant to guide peoples spiritual lives.
This I agree with, it would not have meant anything to anyone at that time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senlatheil
More to the point, although the bible is not a science textbook, it DOES try to answer questions about nature that science has sought to answer. These often disagree to varying extents.
And the answers it give is all the ame nonsense. Take a look at how all earthquakes are god beeing mad or similar gibberish.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Senlatheil
We could ask: Considering the author of the bible is all-knowing, then when the bible explains phenomenon in nature why is it often wrong?
Because the bible was written by men who had no knowledge about how the world operates.
EarlOfLade is offline  
Old 07-29-2006, 06:30 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by One_Of_Logic
If the Bible is scientifically accurate on all points, and is the one and only truth of how the universe was created,

Why doesn't it mention DNA?
Because that antecedent does not imply that consequent.
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 07-29-2006, 12:55 PM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A pale blue oblate spheroid.
Posts: 20,351
Default

But I thought it was scientifically accurate on all points. *sarcasm*
GenesisNemesis is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:30 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.