Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-07-2008, 05:45 PM | #1 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Chili on the second coming split from Once or Twice?
Quote:
We have icons on this that speak louder than bible passages but I forgot where they are. The two donkeys that Jesus straddled into the New Jerusalem are the [rejuvenated] Old and the New life wherefore Jerusalem was his final destination for which Galilee was just a purification stage. |
|
06-07-2008, 05:48 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Once only but that will be the "first coming for the Jews" and "the second coming for Catholics."
|
06-08-2008, 05:22 AM | #3 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
|
|
06-08-2008, 07:28 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Too late to edit so here is a new post for clarity:
Not that difficult to answer Joe because the bible is very clear on this. The peronality is a condition of being that was added to man in Gen. 3 when and why shame first became known to man (notice that in Gen.2:25 they were naked and felt no shame). This first identity to which Joseph was reborn is called Jesus (who's cross was the sin nature that held Joseph's world) and so the second identity that was added in Gen. 3 alone is crucified here but not until the first identity wherein we are son-of-the father (there called Bar-abbas) is set free and that did not happen until the disciples had forsaken him so that they could be raised to unite with the bare naked ego after Jesus was raised, for which also his Jewish garb was spoiled so that only Pure Reason could prevail in heaven. Forsaken is better because Mark does not know that resurrection follows the crisis moment. Matthew does not know this either which is exactly why Christ came and Luke was written. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|