FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-26-2007, 03:28 AM   #11
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
Figurative sense is not dependent on semantics.
Recognizing a non-literal meaning is not dependent upon studying the meaning of words?
No, it is not. The same word can be used literally or metaphorically. Take the phrase 'hard to swallow'. That may refer to a large medicinal tablet, or to an unsettling new fact. Word meaning is the same in each case, and the metaphor relies on that very fact.
Clouseau is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 06:30 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,768
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post

Recognizing a non-literal meaning is not dependent upon studying the meaning of words?
No, it is not. The same word can be used literally or metaphorically. Take the phrase 'hard to swallow'. That may refer to a large medicinal tablet, or to an unsettling new fact. Word meaning is the same in each case, and the metaphor relies on that very fact.
Let's work backwards from this quote:


Quote:
The same word can be used literally or metaphorically. Take the phrase 'hard to swallow'. That may refer to a large medicinal tablet, or to an unsettling new fact. Word meaning is the same in each case, and the metaphor relies on that very fact.
The metaphor relies on what very fact? The fact that the word meaning is the same in each of two ways of using a phrase (literal and figurative). To understand the figurative use, you need to understand the meaning of the words then, right? (Which is to say the literal meaning). So we're all agreed, then right? To understand the figurative meaning, you have to understand the meaning of the words.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post

Recognizing a non-literal meaning is not dependent upon studying the meaning of words?
No, it is not.
VoxRat is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 07:01 AM   #13
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VoxRat View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
No, it is not. The same word can be used literally or metaphorically. Take the phrase 'hard to swallow'. That may refer to a large medicinal tablet, or to an unsettling new fact. Word meaning is the same in each case, and the metaphor relies on that very fact.
Let's work backwards from this quote:


The metaphor relies on what very fact? The fact that the word meaning is the same in each of two ways of using a phrase (literal and figurative). To understand the figurative use, you need to understand the meaning of the words then, right? (Which is to say the literal meaning). So we're all agreed, then right? To understand the figurative meaning, you have to understand the meaning of the words.
Correct; it's essential. If there are any words in the English Bible you don't understand, I suggest you use a dictionary. If you think that any important word of Hebrew or Greek has been mistranslated, just say so, and I'm sure there will be plenty of people willing to assist.
Clouseau is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 07:47 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,768
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by amaleq13
Recognizing a non-literal meaning is not dependent upon studying the meaning of words?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau
No, it is not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau
Correct; it's essential.
VoxRat: Is it just me, or...?
VoxRat is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 08:15 AM   #15
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VoxRat View Post
Is it just me, or...?
No, everyone needs a dictionary at some time. There's no shame.
Clouseau is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 08:20 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,768
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by VoxRat View Post
Is it just me, or...?
No, everyone needs a dictionary at some time. There's no shame.
Hey, <edit> - you'll notice there's no mention of "dictionaries" in the post (#76) wherein I highlighted your apparent inconsistency.

Or are you suggesting that somehow a dictionary would help clear up this inconsistency?
VoxRat is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 08:28 AM   #17
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by VoxRat View Post
Is it just me, or...?
No, everyone needs a dictionary at some time. There's no shame.
Here you are- http://www.chambersharrap.co.uk/chambers/chref.py/main . You're up with the professionals, now. And no charge for the English lesson!
Clouseau is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 08:31 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post

Recognizing a non-literal meaning is not dependent upon studying the meaning of words?
No, it is not. The same word can be used literally or metaphorically.
And how do you differentiate between these two meanings without considering the meaning of the words?
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 08:46 AM   #19
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
No, it is not. The same word can be used literally or metaphorically.
And how do you differentiate between these two meanings without considering the meaning of the words?
You mean how do you differentiate between these two senses without considering the meaning of the words. The sense is derived from the context. I got the phrase 'hard to swallow' from a newspaper headline. I still don't know which sense is meant, as I have not read the article beneath, but the newspaper used the word 'swallow' because it assumes that most people know what it means. Those who do not can look it up in a dictionary, of course.
Clouseau is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 08:53 AM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,768
Default

Quote:
the newspaper used the word 'swallow' because people it assumes that most people know what it means. Those who do not can look it up in a dictionary, of course.
But (for the 3d or 4th time now) there's no need. Because, according to you,
Quote:
Recognizing a non-literal meaning is not dependent upon studying the meaning of words?

No, it is not.
there's no need to know the meaning of the words.
VoxRat is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:58 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.