FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-16-2012, 09:49 AM   #51
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve_bnk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve_bnk View Post
[
The bible as metaphor for the anciernt Jews. We have no way of knowing if the all the writings were intnded to be literal.

Job was probably written as metaphor for Jews in captivity.
I never read Job, but if that Joseph from Matthew was from Egypt and only pretended to be from Nazareth, clearly: "out of Egypt I have called my son" but "he shall be called a Nazorean" it sounds to me that there was Billy Graham style revival in Nazareth that got the best of him there.
I was speaking about the OT. What got passed down as the Jewish OT was probably a fraction of what existed BCE . My Oxford bible commentray says Job was probably part of a larger lost set of wisdom/teaching materials.

As I understand it the JC of the NT would have been recognizable as a Jewish chrasmatic. In general form he would not have been unique.
That is what Galilee is all about. Holy rollers after rebirth wherein only the Jesus of Luke and John are presented as those who successfufly completed it and went to heaven, and 'his brother' James went to hell in Matthew and Mark to make its counterpart known, that necessarily must exist to make the opposites known.
Chili is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 10:06 AM   #52
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27,602
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve_bnk View Post

I was speaking about the OT. What got passed down as the Jewish OT was probably a fraction of what existed BCE . My Oxford bible commentray says Job was probably part of a larger lost set of wisdom/teaching materials.

As I understand it the JC of the NT would have been recognizable as a Jewish chrasmatic. In general form he would not have been unique.
That is what Galilee is all about. Holy rollers after rebirth wherein only the Jesus of Luke and John are presented as those who successfufly completed it and went to heaven, and 'his brother' James went to hell in Matthew and Mark to make its counterpart known, that necessarily must exist to make the opposites known.
I mean recognizable in form in his times as an evangelical Christian would be today.

The JC character minus the added supernatural trappings would not have been unique in his times. It was what Jewish prophets did in Jewish history, prophesize, often doom and gloom, and being treated badly for it.

There were numerous men claiming to be the messiah.
steve_bnk is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 11:14 AM   #53
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
So the Masoretic text is the source for the SP and the LXX? Am I understanding you correctly?
No. But there is good reason to think that the DSS text (with which the later MT agrees) preserves the original reading. This reading is shorter, and the SP and LXX renderings serve an obvious apologetic purpose, not to mention that the LXX and SP differ about where the additional phrase "the land of Canaan" should appear. The former places it after the reference to Egypt, while the latter places it before the reference to Egypt, an additional clue that the text was added to.

As I explained in the OP and elaborated on in my response to Andrew Criddle, I'm curious if there is a solution to the Egyptian-sojourn problem that is consistent with all the relevant biblical passages. Even if we accept the SP/LXX reading of Exodus 12:40, the Genesis-15 problem remains.
John Kesler is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 11:25 AM   #54
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

But why would there be a Samaritan solution (or an Alexandrian solution for that matter) which agrees with the MT when neither community had that reading. The Samaritans are almost always to be preferred over all other traditions, then Karaites (of all surviving traditions) at least according to my aesthetics. Marqe was the greatest interpreter of the Pentateuch.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 01:30 PM   #55
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

When I meet a member of a traditional ancient religion I get the same same feeling as when I go to an absolutely authentic ethnic restaurant. I get very excited because it's like meeting a living embodiment of a system. I get the same way when making love to women in foreign countries. I still have memories of being in the Middle East in this dark room with exotic modern Arab music. Brazil was something else.

The point is that we have to avoid imposing our Western ideas and presuppositions on a text. It's all about the traditional exegesis and working backwards to the original text used by that tradition.

When I was Brazil I had all these meetings and my translator who also Jewish told me once when I got really flustered about the tardiness of people - 'Yes Brazil is very unprofessional, even the prostitutes fall in love with their clients.' It won't make you laugh until you've stayed in Rio for a week. In my case, a day.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 05:10 PM   #56
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,808
Default

Quote:
As in all other matters of this kind, Toto, what you have argued about the fictional nature of the story is only a working hypothesis that cannot be empirically demonstrated or argued unequivocally.


200 years of excavation in Egypt has failed to turn up any evidence of a mass slavery of any Israelites. That tells me that the OT is a bullshit story concocted many centuries later. The trick is merely to figure out when such a story would have served the political masters who concocted it.
Minimalist is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 05:24 PM   #57
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

And I am sure that 2000 years from now there will be no evidence of human population in Toledo Ohio, Flagstaff Arizona, or any archeological proof of the Mexican American War or 9/11. So what? You can make fun of it all you want. That's your faith.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Minimalist View Post
Quote:
As in all other matters of this kind, Toto, what you have argued about the fictional nature of the story is only a working hypothesis that cannot be empirically demonstrated or argued unequivocally.


200 years of excavation in Egypt has failed to turn up any evidence of a mass slavery of any Israelites. That tells me that the OT is a bullshit story concocted many centuries later. The trick is merely to figure out when such a story would have served the political masters who concocted it.
Duvduv is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 05:36 PM   #58
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

Quote:
And I am sure that 2000 years from now there will be no evidence of human population in Toledo Ohio, Flagstaff Arizona, or any archeological proof of the Mexican American War or 9/11. So what? You can make fun of it all you want. That's your faith.
So... you accuse someone of operating on faith while you yourself make confident predictions about 2000 years in the future....

Right.

Anyway, the problem is threefold: (1) not only is there no evidence of Hebrews in Egypt or of any of the events outlined in Exodus, but (2) archaeology suggests that the population now known as Hebrew arose in Palestine and (3) the story as told in Exodus best fits the known situation of a later period, suggesting that is when it arose. It is not merely a question of dismissing the lack of evidence for (1), one must also deal with (2) and (3).

Vorkosigan
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 05:52 PM   #59
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

These are your theories and you are entitled to them.
Many theories change over time. Even quantum physics is beginning to share ideas with old fashioned mysticism of East and West as we find out that all matter is actually only energy......

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan View Post
Quote:
And I am sure that 2000 years from now there will be no evidence of human population in Toledo Ohio, Flagstaff Arizona, or any archeological proof of the Mexican American War or 9/11. So what? You can make fun of it all you want. That's your faith.
So... you accuse someone of operating on faith while you yourself make confident predictions about 2000 years in the future....

Right.

Anyway, the problem is threefold: (1) not only is there no evidence of Hebrews in Egypt or of any of the events outlined in Exodus, but (2) archaeology suggests that the population now known as Hebrew arose in Palestine and (3) the story as told in Exodus best fits the known situation of a later period, suggesting that is when it arose. It is not merely a question of dismissing the lack of evidence for (1), one must also deal with (2) and (3).

Vorkosigan
Duvduv is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 05:54 PM   #60
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

If it weren't for the influence of Jews in America and America's influence over Europe after WWII what evidence would there have been for the Holocaust?
stephan huller is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:04 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.