Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-08-2012, 09:21 PM | #11 | ||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
Quote:
Consider that Psalms 9:5, 69:28 and 109:6-15 referring to the 'blotting out' of the names and memories of the wicked reflect on the concept of this 'blotting out' as having been very early, whether a specific acronym was employed or not. (The practice of deliberately obliberating of the names of despised individuals was a long established ANE custom viz. Akhenaten c. 1300 BCE) As it it stands, the acronym does seem an obvious play on the Hebrew/Aramaic name of a certain infamous, although possibly fictional, convicted Jewish criminal who was reported to have been תלה 'talah' -'hung' upon a tree'. . |
||||
04-08-2012, 11:44 PM | #12 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The only Carribean port not in the Tropics.
Posts: 359
|
Christ onna Stick = Human-Divine Corn Dog. Yes, it's disrespectful to the extreme. That's why the Christian church universally has Jesus nailed on a tropaeum and not a penetrative crux. Both are crosses, mind you.
|
04-08-2012, 11:57 PM | #13 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The only Carribean port not in the Tropics.
Posts: 359
|
Quote:
Not just hung, but hung upon a tree -- תלה על עץ (talah 'al 'tz) used to mean impale upon a stake, according to both the JPS and David W. Chapman (who happens to be a believing Christian btw). |
||
04-09-2012, 12:00 AM | #14 |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27,602
|
From a documentary, the cross Romans used had a removable crosspiece that would fit on the top, more a T than a cross. Arms would be lashed to the crosspiece. When you think about it, nails would have been expensive considering crucifixtion was a regular event.
It would have been inneficient tro nail to a cross on the ground and then raise it. Much easier to lash to a crosspiece and lift it to an upright post. |
04-09-2012, 12:50 AM | #15 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The only Carribean port not in the Tropics.
Posts: 359
|
And after they lashed the criminal to the crossbeam they'd nail his feet to the post, then install an acuta crux (upright peg) underneath him so he may "sit on the cross" when exhausted.
|
04-09-2012, 12:54 AM | #16 |
Moderator -
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
|
Yes, we have concrete verification for the nails through the feet with the Yochanan remains.
|
04-09-2012, 12:58 AM | #17 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The only Carribean port not in the Tropics.
Posts: 359
|
The heelbone was probably the ideal place to nail someone up for execution.
|
04-09-2012, 03:25 AM | #18 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 98
|
Apparently the Greek word used, "xylon", can refer to anything made of wood, not necessarily a tree.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dispute...ecution_method |
04-09-2012, 04:56 AM | #19 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
|
In a previous thread I was wondering why the Constantine generation used the symbol of the chi rho cross instead of the Latin cross, and whether this indicated their belief that the crucifixion was on a chi rho.
I also wonder whether the analogy to the verse in Deuteronomy was useable specifically because of the ambiguity of the meaning of xylon versus stauros. On the other hand, if the chi rho was meant to convey the first two letters of the word xristos, why would the Latin regime use the Greek? |
04-09-2012, 07:17 AM | #20 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 3,551
|
Seems more like a Roman punishment but it's not clear...
The hebrew word is eytz which can mean tree or wood. The impaling part is not clear. The Rabbis appear confused on this, they claim that someone who was stoned gets eytzed after they are dead. Jesus_in_the_Talmud Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|