Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-10-2009, 08:03 AM | #11 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: EARTH
Posts: 463
|
Quote:
This was a theological battle for the right to freedom of belief - confronted by the Jews - alone again - naturally. And Mighty Rome lost. But who won the battle Joseph? Einstein with his theory of relativity? Wow, weren't we lucky? It's all relative? Is it? Relative to what? Does the word moral slip in there anywhere in Einsteins thought experiments? Einstein developed the theory that it is all relative, but relative to what? When invited to some gala or other, to which he was frequesntly invited with his new found popularity, Einstein found himself seated next to a theologin who asked, what does this theory of relativity have to do with religion, to which Einstein smuggly stated, nothing. From what I gather, Einstein took great pleasure in the fact that so many were confused by his theories, however, it is my opinion that Hitler wasn't. The science is in, it is all relative, and so Hitler arose and said, Eureka! Many followed in his footsteps, some very, very cunningly, and still others have been following it ever since. Such is life. Quote:
We are all effected, for better or worse by WWII, not just the Jews. |
||
07-10-2009, 09:55 PM | #12 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,265
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
07-10-2009, 09:59 PM | #13 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Latin America
Posts: 4,066
|
Quote:
|
||
07-10-2009, 10:02 PM | #14 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,265
|
Quote:
Amazingly, there are two such charges - another from the Quran - and both these documents contradict each other - theologically, historically and mathematically. If presented in an earthly court - it will be thrown out and all charges reversed. Why would it be different in a heavenly court!? |
||
07-10-2009, 10:21 PM | #15 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,265
|
Quote:
I see Iran as more Christianity's problem - sent as an omen for Europe's hstory with the jews. This regime also says the Jewish temple is a myth: what does that do to the Gospels which says one JC visited this mythical temple? The Jews have survived three Holocausts - two by Europe, and one by the Arabs: will Europe survive the same when Iran attacks cowardly European infidels? I say Israel must cease from stopping Iran - but also sell her advanced weapons able to reach Europe - at cut price rates. That will be a good answer to Europe and the Arab Regimes. Every christian knows that Israel is confronting nazi like demands of on-going serial 2-states on the same laughably sized, miniscule land - for *PEACE* [traditional Euro designed peace based on love is all you need!] - and that this has nothing to do with 10 cubits of barren land - and that Christianity is aligning itself with Israel's demise. My good advice to christians is to thread carefully, and nothing save the restoring of the Balfour will save the day, and apologising for calling both Jews and Muslims as Philistines - that name is not of a middle-eastern people - you dumped this on the jewish homeland in 70 CE - and when this failed - you switched and dumped this on the Arabs! Get real - surely you guys are red faced when no one is looking! :redface: |
||
07-10-2009, 10:29 PM | #16 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,265
|
A grotesque lie of biblical and historical proportions - its only intention to confuse, negate and deflect from the truth by infering fictional equavalences. Confront your history in the face, eye to eye.
|
07-11-2009, 06:34 AM | #17 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: EARTH
Posts: 463
|
Quote:
Well, you know what they say about stupid don’t you, Stupid is as stupid does. I guess that makes all the Rabbi’s that question him with the same sort of questions, stupid as well. I guess that makes me stupid, and a liar to boot. I’ll go crawl on my belly for the rest of my days..........and eat dust. Anyway, I wish you well. |
|
07-11-2009, 08:11 AM | #18 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,265
|
Quote:
|
||
07-11-2009, 03:52 PM | #19 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,779
|
Gday,
Now there's a first ! We've all seen plenty of people confuse the Virgin Birth with the Immaculate Conception (complete different events.) But this is the first time I have ever heard of an "immaculate birth". Did that come before or after the Virgin Conception I wonder? :-) K. |
07-11-2009, 04:29 PM | #20 |
Obsessed Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 61,538
|
Immaculate birth would be an extremely useful technology. Births are way too messy.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|