Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
12-31-2008, 03:27 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
|
Anthropomorphic cross?
I recently learned of two very early instances of Christians writing about the cross as if it were a spiritual entity. I was wondering if you folks knew of any more, or if you have any idea how these traditions came about.
Here is the first example, from the Gospel of the Savior (AKA unknown Berlin Gospel). Jesus talks to the cross: 62 [The Savior] said to us, “No lot surpasses your own, nor is there any glory more exalted than [your own. 63 ...31 lines untranslatable...] [... 31 lines untranslatable...] 64 O entirety [...2 lines untranslatable...] 65 O [...19 lines untranslatable...] cross [...5 lines untranslatable...] three [days I will] take you[...] with me and and show you [the] things you desire [to] see. 66 So [do not be alarmed] when [you] see [me]!”This is the second example, from the Gospel of Peter, chapter 10. God talks to the cross, and it answers back: 1 Now when these soldiers saw that, they woke up the centurion and the elders (for they also were there keeping watch). 2 While they were yet telling them the things which they had seen, they saw three men come out of the tomb, two of them sustaining the other one, and a cross following after them. 3 The heads of the two they saw had heads that reached up to heaven, but the head of him that was led by them wen beyond heaven. 4 And they heard a voice out of the heavens saying, "Have you preached unto them that sleep?" 5 The answer that was heard from the cross was, "Yes!"What do you folks make of these passages? |
12-31-2008, 03:53 PM | #2 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Your first quote is from Lost Scriptures (or via: amazon.co.uk) By Bart D. Ehrman, available on google books. There is also a book (or via: amazon.co.uk) by Charles Hedrick and Paul Mirecki, the translators.
Roger Pearse has a page on this gospel here. I don't see this as the cross being a "spiritual" entity, more like a personal entity. Jesus addresses the cross, and welcomes it as part of his fulfilling of his mission, as he does in a religious image in a local church. But it is difficult to interpret these gnostic texts. |
12-31-2008, 06:31 PM | #3 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Quote:
These passages are cited from the flip-side of the new testament canon otherwise referred to as the new testament apochrypha. "Hidden writings". The references to a talking cross here are echoed in all sorts of talking animals and creatures in the apochypha. The apochyphal passages are generally very loosely referred to as -- partly -- gnostic, but the term gnostic itself opens another can of worms. Very little if any interpetation in the standard textual critical manner can be securely applied to the apochrypha as a whole, and they have been described by at least one commentator, as a textual critic's nightmare. On the gPeter: Quote:
Pete |
||
01-02-2009, 08:32 AM | #4 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
|
These passages may be relevant
Sibylline Oracles Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
01-04-2009, 04:27 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|