FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-07-2005, 09:45 PM   #31
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
If you compaired your body at a distance of twenty years, you'd find basically nothing the same. Does that mean that you are not you?

If you check the bible from Qumran, you'll find many small variations, some large ones. They all circulated at the same time. The existence of books like Sam/Kings and Chronicles you can see that different editions of material exist with quite large differences. Your thoughts simply don't represent the reality.

To whom and to what are you responding?

Thanks
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 10:11 PM   #32
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle
Fascinating!

To attempt a summary - Christ's priesthood - nb - NOT Jesus' - is above in some way the classic Hebrew priesthood, has strong links to the Hasmonean priest-king concepts of the second century BC, deforms Judaism in that the Priest is never the sacrifice, and basically feels like a cuckoo landing in Judaism's nest! Jesus is not a priest but his death - but who's death - (Jesus' or Christ's?) - makes him a priest!

If it looks like a myth, quacks like a myth....,
I know I am making rhetorical arguments above, but am I attempting a reasonable summary?

Do we have two separate mythical people - one earth bound, the other heavenly - "Jesus" and "Christ" who for the sake of the story - about death - were joined together, and the human bit - Jesus - later blown up like a ballooon - to make the story feel more real?

Vork, your links are fascinating, is Crispin Fletcher Louis working from an assumed HJ paradigm, has anyone reworked these types of arguments from an MJ perspective?

The quote from the Westminster confession, and thinking about my experience, seems to be saying that xians unconsciously acknowledge two seperate persons - Jesus and Christ. Has anyone summarised how these terms are used, when separately, when together, and looked at the timeline?
Clivedurdle is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:30 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.