Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
07-04-2005, 01:56 AM | #41 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Material World
Posts: 834
|
Quote:
|
|
07-04-2005, 02:04 AM | #42 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Material World
Posts: 834
|
Quote:
|
|
07-04-2005, 02:36 AM | #43 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Material World
Posts: 834
|
Quote:
And if Moses hadn't yet come down with the tablets, then how were they supposed to know that graven images weren't allowed? For that matter, what does this commandment mean? Moses was instructed to make gold statues of seraphim on the Ark of the Covenenant, and later Yahweh orders him to make a bronze statue of a serpent to magically heal people who are wounded by Yahweh's own "fiery serpents." Aren't those "evil" acts? What about the images on our coins? You know, the pictures next to the words "in God we trust." Does that count as the sort of "evil" which justifies a massacre? What about a large statue of the ten commandments themselves? Most theists today fail to see the irony in that situation. Should Roy Moore have been executed for his "evil" act? If Yahweh wanted people to obey his rules, then he really should have phrased them less ambiguously, but his poor writing skills hardly justify mass slaughter. |
|
07-04-2005, 08:29 AM | #44 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: home
Posts: 3,715
|
They were supposed to have known that graven images were prohibited because they all 'saw the voices' (were they on drugs?) from the mountain. the tablets were for permanent record only.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|