FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-02-2005, 12:43 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default Were the Biblical authors idiots?

We have all heard of the famous liar paradox , first expressed by Epemindes (spelling), when he said that 'All Cretans are liars'.

Now there are many things to be said about the liar paradox.

One of the least useful things to say is that it is a statement of fact about the moral nature of the inhabitants of Crete.

Yet this is what we find in Titus 1

11 They must be silenced, because they are ruining whole households by teaching things they ought not to teach–and that for the sake of dishonest gain.

12Even one of their own prophets has said, “Cretans are always liars, evil brutes, lazy gluttons.�

13This testimony is true. Therefore, rebuke them sharply, so that they will be sound in the faith and will pay no attention to Jewish myths or to the commands of those who reject the truth.

Was the author just an idiot, to take the liar paradox so woodenly literally as he did?
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 04-02-2005, 01:02 AM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

I wonder what Martin van Buren (Old Kinderhoek, where he was born) would think about people these days having lost the context of his "initials", "OK", being used without one being aware of the origin and "real" siginificance of the term?

Maybe even that's incorrect...


spin
spin is offline  
Old 04-02-2005, 06:17 AM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 33
Default Short answer

Yes.
Duncan Abercrombie is offline  
Old 04-02-2005, 08:44 AM   #4
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rostock, Germany
Posts: 143
Default

If Epimenides (or whomever the biblical author cites) meant just to formulate a paradox, why did he add "evil brutes" and "lazy gluttons"? Maybe originally it was, in fact, a moral comment, and only later somebody noted its paradoxical nature?
Benni72 is offline  
Old 04-02-2005, 09:39 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default

You could be right.

Actually, the lie that Epiminides was referring to was the claim that Zeus was mortal. Perhaps the Bible is right and this was a lie.

'They fashioned a tomb for thee, O holy and high one—
The Cretans, always liars, evil beasts, idle bellies!
But thou art not dead: thou livest and abidest forever,
For in thee we live and move and have our being.'

Rather curiously , the 4th line of this address to Zeus is quoted in Acts 17:28.
There is no doubt that the author of Acts was a learned man, who happily took Greek literature and Christianised it.

The Cretan is also in Callimachus 'Hymn to Zeus'

How should we sing of him, as Dictaean or Lycaean? My mind is full of doubt, since his birth is disputed. Zeus, some say you were born in the Idaian hills , but others say, Zeus, you were born in Arcadia. Which ones, O Father, are the liars? "The Cretans always lie." For the Cretans built you a tomb, Lord. Yet you did not die; you are eternal.
Steven Carr is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:52 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.