FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-19-2006, 08:37 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Planet Earth......... for now
Posts: 1,089
Default Where’s the beef?

I recently showed “Asimov’s Guide to the Bible” to a Christian friend of mine who is also a history buff. She read the cover flap and singled out this sentence, “Why is Jesus mentioned in the Bible, but not in any other books or records written during the same time period?” She said that this was not true. However, when pressed, she could not come up with a single source. So my question for you learned scholars of anti-religion is this:

Are there any other books or records, aside form the Bible, written between say 100BCE and 100CE that mention Jesus of Nazareth?
spacejunkie is offline  
Old 06-19-2006, 08:41 AM   #2
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

No.
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 06-19-2006, 09:06 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

The long answer: See this thread: Extra Biblical Evidence For Jesus

The short answer is "No". There are no extrabiblical references to "Jesus of Nazareth".
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 06-19-2006, 09:17 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spacejunkie
I recently showed “Asimov’s Guide to the Bible” to a Christian friend of mine who is also a history buff. She read the cover flap and singled out this sentence, “Why is Jesus mentioned in the Bible, but not in any other books or records written during the same time period?” She said that this was not true. However, when pressed, she could not come up with a single source. So my question for you learned scholars of anti-religion is this:

Are there any other books or records, aside form the Bible, written between say 100BCE and 100CE that mention Jesus of Nazareth?
The standard mentions are in Tacitus, Annals 15:44; a possible in Suetonius referring to an otherwise inscrutable 'Chrestus'; and two passages in Josephus, Antiquities, the first in book 18 (which most people believe is damaged and perhaps unreliable) and a second in book 20. All these references are brief. Since Tacitus, Suetonius and Cassius Dio are the main historical sources for our knowledge of the reign of Tiberius, the snippets we have are fairly reasonable as attestation of a frankly minor figure.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 06-19-2006, 09:17 AM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Death Panel District 9
Posts: 20,921
Default

And why would anyone expect there to be? He wasn't a Roman bigshot so no contemporary official history would have noticed him. Also, I'm sure there were other Jews out there with a bigger reputation.
Nice Squirrel is offline  
Old 06-19-2006, 09:32 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the torture chambers of Pinochet's Chile
Posts: 2,112
Default

Hi, Roger. Did you like my debate with the Muslims on Ummah? You should go there. Recently, they posted up celebratory threads about (premature) reports of the death of Jyland-Posten's editor in a fire. If I recall correctly, one said something along the lines of "nothing like the smell of Danish bacon." For those guys, that took a lotof their wit .

Anyway, I've heard you mention that Dio talks about Jesus. Where is this? His works are avaliable at LacusCurtius, here http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/..._Dio/home.html
I’m assuming it’s somewhere in books 53-58, correct?

And also, these guys seem to be pointing out that none of the early non-Biblical references call him "Jesus of Nazareth."
countjulian is offline  
Old 06-19-2006, 09:59 AM   #7
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Pearse
The standard mentions are in Tacitus, Annals 15:44; a possible in Suetonius referring to an otherwise inscrutable 'Chrestus'; and two passages in Josephus, Antiquities, the first in book 18 (which most people believe is damaged and perhaps unreliable) and a second in book 20. All these references are brief. Since Tacitus, Suetonius and Cassius Dio are the main historical sources for our knowledge of the reign of Tiberius, the snippets we have are fairly reasonable as attestation of a frankly minor figure.
The OP asked for 1st Century references. Tactitus and Suetonius are 2nd Century and Suetonius' "Chrestus" cannot be taken seriously as a reference to Jesus anyway.
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 06-19-2006, 10:14 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: US
Posts: 1,216
Default

It doesn't take a genius to realize that if we took the gospels at face value there would without a doubt be others who would have written of Jesus(contemporary, secular writers). The whole earth darkening, people rising from the dead and walking in the streets, a man who did miracles whose fame spread throughout the country. These things cannot be done in secret! These things would have inspired others surely to write of this amazing man! Doesn't this make you the slightest bit skeptical? You don't find it amazing that no one wrote of him? I do. Not one contemporary.



Things that make ya go hmmmmmm ? ? ?
Spanky is offline  
Old 06-19-2006, 11:28 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,307
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes the Cynic
The OP asked for 1st Century references. Tactitus and Suetonius are 2nd Century
That's true -- and it exposes a serious problem with the arbitrary cut-off in the OP's question, which excludes two of the most important sources we have for the reign of Tiberius, the emperor Pontius Pilate served under. If Josephus is in (just barely), but Tacitus and Suetonius are out (just barely), then our knowledge for this period of Roman history would be greatly impoverished.

Stephen Carlson
S.C.Carlson is offline  
Old 06-19-2006, 11:32 AM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: urban hell, UK
Posts: 17
Default

no mentions. perhaps because:

"during his lifetime he accomplished nothing worth hearing of, unless anyone thinks that to heal crooked and blind men and to exorcise those who were possessed by evil demons in the villages of bethsaida and bethany can be classed as a mighty achievement"
- julian the apostate
http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/ju...ans_1_text.htm
steph s. is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:26 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.