FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-25-2007, 06:50 PM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default Comparison: Graydon Snyder (1985) vs Robin Lane Fox (1986) ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by neilgodfrey View Post
Elsa Gibson's "The 'Christians for Christians' Inscriptions of Phrygia. Greek Texts, Translation and Commentary (or via: amazon.co.uk)" (1978) discusses third century Christian funerary texts. p.4 "The 'Christians for Christians' formula is pre-Constantinian. One inscription is dated to 248/9 A.D. . . . ."

I have reviewed this book by Gibson.


Quote:
There's also Graydon Snyder's "Ante Pacem: Archaeological Evidence of Church Life Before Constantine (or via: amazon.co.uk)" (1985)

As per the title this work illustrates Christian culture (mostly funerary) 180 to 313 c.e. Snyder lists a conservative 62 pre-constantinian mostly funerary/catacomb inscriptions. I especially love the late first/early second century sarcophagi such as that of Sta Maria Antiqua. He even cites a pre-constantinian house-church (at Dura Europos).
I will get to look at Sta Maria Antiqua sarcophagi in time.
For the moment, be aware that Dura is not unambiguous.


Quote:
Snyder concludes with a discussion of why Christian culture did not differentiate itself until after 180, though his explanation seems a bit circular to me leaving the question hanging: "A.D. 180 was the date at which the Christian subculture was willing to say to the majority culture that it existed and had a right to exist. Because of that courage...." (pp164/5)

Although I have not yet read this work, I have almost
completed a reading of the book "Pagans and Christians (or via: amazon.co.uk)" by Robin Lane Fox. (1986) -- published a year later.

Is there someone who has read both these two books
who might be able to relate which of the two was
preferred and the reasons; or are they each unique?

Thanks for any information.
Best wishes,


Pete Brown
mountainman is offline  
Old 07-26-2007, 04:03 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mornington Peninsula
Posts: 1,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Although I have not yet read this work
Pete Brown
Pete, if there is an elephant you persist in missing it!

hint

I threw that up to test the reaction. There was none.
Am currently reading what the art historians have to say about pre-Constantinian Xianity. Lots of interesting stuff. 2nd century apologists seem to figure quite prominently. HJ does not.
youngalexander is offline  
Old 07-28-2007, 07:30 AM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by youngalexander View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Although I have not yet read this work
Pete Brown
Pete, if there is an elephant you persist in missing it!

hint

I threw that up to test the reaction. There was none.
Am currently reading what the art historians have to say about pre-Constantinian Xianity. Lots of interesting stuff. 2nd century apologists seem to figure quite prominently. HJ does not.

Thanks for the hint YA.

I am in the process of collating my notes on the book
by Robin Lane Fox and will post again then.

In your other post you wrote:

Quote:
In fact, of the approximately 180 pre-Constantinian pictorial representations of Christianity, only 30 have NT themes, the other 150 are OT. Furthermore, of the 30, two (Christ Helios and the Ascension of Elijah) are mythical, six depict the Baptism of Jesus, two depict Jesus teaching, six depict Jesus healing, five depict the Resurrection of Lazerus (not Jesus) and none have a Cross or resurrected Jesus.
What can you tell me about the 30 citations by Snyder?
How many times is art at Dura-Europa included in this list?
Which is his main citation (and date) for the art collection?

Many thanks, and best wishes,

Pete Brown
mountainman is offline  
Old 07-29-2007, 12:31 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 980
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by youngalexander View Post
Pete, if there is an elephant you persist in missing it!

hint

I threw that up to test the reaction. There was none.
Am currently reading what the art historians have to say about pre-Constantinian Xianity. Lots of interesting stuff. 2nd century apologists seem to figure quite prominently. HJ does not.

Thanks for the hint YA.

I am in the process of collating my notes on the book
by Robin Lane Fox and will post again then.

In your other post you wrote:

Quote:
In fact, of the approximately 180 pre-Constantinian pictorial representations of Christianity, only 30 have NT themes, the other 150 are OT. Furthermore, of the 30, two (Christ Helios and the Ascension of Elijah) are mythical, six depict the Baptism of Jesus, two depict Jesus teaching, six depict Jesus healing, five depict the Resurrection of Lazerus (not Jesus) and none have a Cross or resurrected Jesus.
What can you tell me about the 30 citations by Snyder?
How many times is art at Dura-Europa included in this list?
Which is his main citation (and date) for the art collection?

Many thanks, and best wishes,

Pete Brown

I read Fox's book many years ago. I'd be interested in reading it again. Unfortunately I'm up to my eyeballs this summer and the fall semester is coming. So not much chance of getting to it. I'd be interested in seeing your notes.


By the way, who is HJ?
Nevermind, I figured it out.
arricchio is offline  
Old 07-29-2007, 01:36 PM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arricchio;4656696I
read Fox's book many years ago. I'd be interested in reading it again. Unfortunately I'm up to my eyeballs this summer and the fall semester is coming. So not much chance of getting to it. I'd be interested in seeing your notes.
Thanks arricho,

I think that many readers will find them absolutely fascinating.
The 600 odd pages went rather quickly but in the end we are
left with "Robin Lane Fox's Condensed listing of archeological
and/or scientific citations for the existence of "christianity" in
the pre-Nicene epoch.

We have already been through the great bulk of them, in this
forum, and in associated discussions. I have to say that the
research yielded by volume far more evidence in support of
my thesis that Constantine invented christianity.

Best wishes for now,


Pete
mountainman is offline  
Old 07-29-2007, 08:21 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 980
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
I have to say that the research yielded by volume far more evidence in support of my thesis that Constantine invented christianity.

Best wishes for now,


Pete
Oh Mountainman, Mountainman. I wish I could dissuade from this idea. I just don't think that anyone as thick-headed as Constantine apparently was on matters theological could have contrived such an elaborate system of theology. But we've had that discussion.
arricchio is offline  
Old 07-29-2007, 09:05 PM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arricchio View Post
Oh Mountainman, Mountainman. I wish I could dissuade from this idea.
With just one solitary unambiguous archeological and/or
modern scientific citation for the existence of anything
"christian" in the pre-Nicaean epoch, any one person
would dissuade me from the hypothesis that Eusebius
tendered a package of fiction to Constantine.

But until that citation is mentioned ...

Quote:
I just don't think that anyone as thick-headed as Constantine apparently was on matters theological could have contrived such an elaborate system of theology. But we've had that discussion.
Perhaps, but very shortly you may perceive that
Robin Lane Fox and Dr. Treadgold do not see eye
to eye on a number of critical issues in regard to
Constantine, who is described as "thick-necked",
not "thick-headed".

Academics remain blissfully ignorant of the native
cunning of the military mind. As Smedley Butler
keenly perceived, "War is Racket". The new
testament was a baby born onto an empire of war.


Best wishes,

Pete Brown
mountainman is offline  
Old 07-30-2007, 04:42 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mornington Peninsula
Posts: 1,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
What can you tell me about the 30 citations by Snyder?
How many times is art at Dura-Europa included in this list?
Which is his main citation (and date) for the art collection?
Pete Brown
Ah Pete, how we love and indulge you!

A-P p134:
The vault of the canopy and the ceiling of the baptistery were painted a dark blue with stars formed by rays and dots.
I cannot tell you how happy I was to read this, and to observe the ceiling
Pete, as you know we are privileged in Oz with black skies and a brilliant display of stars. Imagine my amazement some ten yrs ago when trouping about Italia. The churches/cathedrals invariably displayed azure blue apses and a regular array (geometric) arrangement of stars?? As a physicist and atmospheric scientist I naturally found this fascinating.

I shall not boor either you, or the lurkers, with my scientific conclusions re this, the degree of humidity in the european atmosphere (notice the vapor trails), the ephemeral nature of casual heavenly observation [see my notes while staring thru a skylight in Normandy as to why those geometric patterns developed], the various levels of this heavenly patterning and its possible correlation with scientific developments of the time, nor indeed with the culmination of these designs in the splendid ceiling of Sacre Coeur which displays the entire Milky Way - before it was even known?!

but I have digressed;
The canopy wall contained the Good Shepherd, with Adam and Eve below the figure of the shepherd. To the left of the baptismal canopy, on the south wall, is the Woman at the Well and David and Goliath farther to the left, both on the upper register. To the right of the canopy, on the north wall, we find on the upper register the Healing of the Paralytic and Peter and Jesus walking on the water near a boat. On the Lower level are several women, approaching what appears to be a tomb.
The thing is Pete, you have undoubtedly discovered an odd occurance. Altho scholars discovered it long ago. Unfortunately you have jumped to a decidedly far fetched explanation.

I say again, if there is an elephant lurking hereabouts, may it not consist of the following connected questions.

1. Why are the early Christian epistles silent about a historical jesus?

2. Why is early Christian art late? > 200 C.E.

3. Why is early Christian art overwhelmingly 4:1 OT:NT - & NT does not mean Gospel HJ?

The first Q has been discussed here continuously. Where are the Art historians? What say you re Q2 & Q3?

Many of you are looking to broaden the discussion, particularly those who are MJ inclined. May I recommend the archaeological evidence, which seems to be severely neglected hereabouts!

PS: Mods
Quote:
Originally Posted by mm
book "Pagans and Christians" by Robin Lane Fox. (1986)
in OP has been linked to 'Pagans & Christians' by Gus diZerega 2001
youngalexander is offline  
Old 07-30-2007, 11:07 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by youngalexander View Post
PS: Mods
Quote:
Originally Posted by mm
book "Pagans and Christians" by Robin Lane Fox. (1986)
in OP has been linked to 'Pagans & Christians' by Gus diZerega 2001
Fixed
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 07-31-2007, 10:45 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 980
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
With just one solitary unambiguous archeological and/or
modern scientific citation for the existence of anything
"christian" in the pre-Nicaean epoch, any one person
would dissuade me from the hypothesis that Eusebius
tendered a package of fiction to Constantine.
I was just perusing my copy of Fox and found this on page 268. I wonder if you noted it as well:
Quote:
The number and identity of Christians before Constantine are disputed subjects because most of the relevant evidence is of this type [ie, framentary].
Hmmmm…..

Quote:
Perhaps, but very shortly you may perceive that
Robin Lane Fox and Dr. Treadgold do not see eye
to eye on a number of critical issues who is described as "thick-necked",
not "thick-headed".
Ha! Probably true. I think I'll ask Dr. Treadgold his opinion of Robert Lane Fox the next time I see him. He'll probably say "Robert Lane Who?" And yes, "thick-headed" is my term not his although I don't think he'd completely disagree with it.

P.S. He has a new book out: Early Byzantine Historians I haven't seen it yet, but apparently there's a section on Eusebius. I'll see if the university library has a copy yet and let you know what it says.
arricchio is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:43 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.