FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-27-2009, 11:59 PM   #241
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joan of Bark View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBelieveInHymn View Post
The words Jesus used could have either meant generation or race. This is similiar to "hate" equals "love lesser than."
Yet all the modern translators use 'generation' and 'hate' in every Bible. Again I ask, why would they use these translations if other words make more sense?
IBelieveInHymn has a special dispensation to rewrite the bible as he sees it should be.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 04:49 AM   #242
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 759
Default

Once again, I have to ask...

How/why did God allow his one, supposedly perfect, work to be mistranslated???

IBIH, how can you claim the bible is perfect AND have translation errors?
Dark Virtue is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 06:19 AM   #243
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: California, United States of America, Earth
Posts: 228
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Virtue View Post
Once again, I have to ask...

How/why did God allow his one, supposedly perfect, work to be mistranslated???

IBIH, how can you claim the bible is perfect AND have translation errors?
Playing devil's advocate here, I'm sure he will say that the bible was perfect in its original form, but any flaws developed as a result of translation.
sanguines is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 07:06 AM   #244
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,348
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanguines View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Virtue View Post
Once again, I have to ask...

How/why did God allow his one, supposedly perfect, work to be mistranslated???

IBIH, how can you claim the bible is perfect AND have translation errors?
Playing devil's advocate here, I'm sure he will say that the bible was perfect in its original form, but any flaws developed as a result of translation.
Which raises the question of why God would divinely inspire inerrant originals and then fail to divinely preserve them?
Deus Ex is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 07:26 AM   #245
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Collingswood, NJ
Posts: 1,259
Default

I just want to get a little more out there for people who don't understand the problems with IBelieveInHymn's gloss of "race" for γενεα/$RBT) in Matt 24:34.

There is a sense of γενεα that means a group of people, as in a race. However, it doesn't mean what our word "race" means, because "race" is a word that doesn't have a temporal component. The Greek word γενεα - and its Aramaic equivalent $RBT) which IBIH thinks we should consider as original - is glossed in Thayer's Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament as "(4) The whole multitude of men living at the same time--Mt xxiv.34... used esp. of the Jewish race living at one and the same period." This is the sense in which the Amplified Bible, which uses expanded meanings for somewhat ambiguous words in the NT, uses to clarify "generation" in Matt. 24:34.

IBIH has tried to make this word just mean "race," but that's a really poor reading of the text. The word primarily means "generation," and even if you could find a definition of "generation" in the OED that means "race," you would have to find an explanation for why the author didn't use a word that means "race." It's possible that Matt 24:34 is referring to the Jewish race - at the time that Jesus was speaking. For instance if you read Matt. 1:17 or Matt. 11:16 it's quite obvious that this means "generation" in its context throughout the Gospel. This is why no one has actually used the gloss "race" that he is so insistent upon. Its sense as "race" is handled in the Amplified Bible: "Truly, I tell you, this generation--that is, the whole multitude of people living at the same time, in a definite, given period--will not pass away till all these things taken together take place." Translating it as "race" without qualifying that it is tightly bound to the current time is downright misleading, incorrect, and not supported by any translator or Bible scholar.
graymouser is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 07:50 AM   #246
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Ex View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanguines View Post

Playing devil's advocate here, I'm sure he will say that the bible was perfect in its original form, but any flaws developed as a result of translation.
Which raises the question of why God would divinely inspire inerrant originals and then fail to divinely preserve them?
BINGO!
Dark Virtue is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 03:32 PM   #247
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: California, United States of America, Earth
Posts: 228
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Virtue View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Ex View Post
Which raises the question of why God would divinely inspire inerrant originals and then fail to divinely preserve them?
BINGO!
Does it raise the question, though? Supposedly, god is all about the free will and whatnot.
sanguines is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 04:14 PM   #248
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanguines View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Virtue View Post

BINGO!
Does it raise the question, though? Supposedly, god is all about the free will and whatnot.
Why is god about free will? God in the Bible is about omnipotence, maybe omnibenevolence. The Bible says nothing coherent about free will. Theologians and philosophers seem to have invented the concept.

Someone who allows you to choose A over B, but threatens you will eternal damnation for choosing A, has hardly given you free will.

In any case, there is an entire sub-forum under Philosophy devoted to Free Will, if you want to discuss it.
Toto is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 06:22 PM   #249
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,936
Default

Free-will is a later add on to Christian philosophy.

I kind of feel that if Free Will was the answer to the Problem of Evil, God wouldn't have answered Job with "WHAT THE HELL MAN, ARE YOU GOD? No, you're not. So shut up."
Ktotwf is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 06:44 PM   #250
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Killeen, TX
Posts: 1,388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Ex View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanguines View Post

Playing devil's advocate here, I'm sure he will say that the bible was perfect in its original form, but any flaws developed as a result of translation.
Which raises the question of why God would divinely inspire inerrant originals and then fail to divinely preserve them?
It probably has to do with his other thread, where he says :devil1: is in control of the world, so I would assume that :devil1: has been writing the bibles so that they all say the wrong thing. Of course, that calls into question everything else written down, but Hymn has his Christian Rock Ears on, and Knows the Truth from Holy Radio Reception!

Everyone else is wrong and will burn in hell forever. Amen. :notworthy:
badger3k is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:40 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.