FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-29-2006, 01:54 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyN View Post
Tony's reply:
That's funny, I didn't know the Bible had such glaring contradictions in it. God says He will save all mankind in 1 Timothy 2:4 because Christ ransomed all mankind (1 Tim.2:6) and yet you say you have found a passage that contradict that. My my my.
Are you being facetious? The bible is one glaring contradiction after another. Do you agree with this?

Quote:
Douglas, Luke 24:16 does not say "wedding banquet" as you suggest. It is only about a man making a great dinner and inviting guests to it. Some cannot come. Others do. The parable (and that is all it is) is about being a disciple of Christ.
I don't see your point. In Matthew it's a wedding banquet and in Luke it's a feast. What difference does it make if it's wedding banquet or a great dinner? And you are wrong on it being about "disciples of Christ." It's a description of the kingdom of heavan.

Quote:
Douglas, believe me when I tell you, and if you cannot believe me at least believe God: God will have all mankind to be saved. Bank on it.
Make that your major thesis rather than judgment verses. Everything will fall in place. God is not some great diabolical monster who is going to eternally torture people.
Bank on it, eh? Wow! Since you put it that way, TonyN, sign me up?:Cheeky: Try making "God doesn't exist" and "the bible is fiction" your major thesis, then see how things "fall in to place."
douglas is offline  
Old 12-29-2006, 02:08 PM   #12
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default God is not merciful.

While the Bible disagrees with Tony, I think that we should at least give him some credit for believing that God is much more merciful than the majority of Christians believe he is. Tony is a noticeable improvement over most of the Christians who I have debated.

Tony, what exactly are you trying to convince people of at this forum?

Aren't you more of a universalist than a Christian?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 12-29-2006, 03:21 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: nm
Posts: 2,826
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyN View Post
Douglas, believe me when I tell you, and if you cannot believe me at least believe God: God will have all mankind to be saved. Bank on it.
Make that your major thesis rather than judgment verses.
Then it is absolutely unnecessary for anyone to follow any religion or religious doctrine at all. The Christians can stop putting that separatist label on themselves and stop chivvying everyone/anyone else. No need for churches or preachers or any of it. Good!
#1492 ETA: my Christopher Columbus post!
maddog is offline  
Old 12-29-2006, 05:40 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Florida east coast, near Daytona
Posts: 4,969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post
While the Bible disagrees with Tony, I think that we should at least give him some credit for believing that God is much more merciful than the majority of Christians believe he is. Tony is a noticeable improvement over most of the Christians who I have debated.
I've thought about this, and I agree that he is an improvement. I still see him as a cherry-picker of scriptures, but almost anyone would need to cherry pick and have a strange interpretation of the bible, since the bible does contradict itself so often.

Tony seems to have adopted a god who is logically consistent with 'true mercy'. I kind of like this aspect of Tony's god. He makes more logical sense when it comes to the sacrifice of Christ, truly dying for all. However, I don't know why god had to go to all this trouble in the first place. A wise & omnipotent god could've arranged things better at the outset, than placing A&E in the garden and have them "fall" for the express purpose of being merciful in the end to all.

He could've just said .. "you ate the apple? doh! well, I forgive you". Instead we got a cursed world with endless misery.
ziffel is offline  
Old 12-29-2006, 05:53 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Third rock from the sun
Posts: 532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post
God endorses unmerciful eternal punishment without parole. If mercy is anything, it is forgoing eternal punishment with parole even when justice, in this case, God's justice, requires it. Otherwise, mercy is meaningless. If God gave skeptics a parole in the next life, Christians would surely approve, but yet, they currently approve of God's endorsement of eternal punishment without parole. Do Christians actually have any opinions of their own?

What could possibly be more merciful than forgoing eternal punishment without parole?
Come on johnny you know is no gods, whats the point?
ManIsGod is offline  
Old 12-29-2006, 05:56 PM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southwest, US
Posts: 8,759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyN
Mat 25:32 and in front of Him shall be gathered all the nations. And He shall be severing them from one another even as a shepherd is severing the sheep from the kids.
The nations, which most likely are represented by one or more representatives like we do in the United Nations, will be present before Christ when He returns to judge them as to how they treated His brethren during their great tribulation.
You are still reading into this since it just simply means everyone. Everyone is to be judged, not just leaders.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyN
First of all, Sharon, there is not 1000 years of torture. It is chastening (kolasin in Greek.) Kolasin was always used as a remedial thing to the Greeks. So it is "kolasin eonian."
You just misunderstood what I put because a thousand years of being disciplined equals torture.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyN
It is not that one just gets 1000 years of life but that the nations that treated Christ's brethren well will get to enjoy the kingdom life of that 1000 years. They will enjoy the benefits of the kingdom. If Russia treats Christ's brethren well then the nation of Russia will enjoy 1000 years of blessings.
Besides still continuing to give your personal impression, you still haven't answered as to what happens next.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyN
1000 years of torture is not merciful. It is 1000 years of chastening which is being ruled by an iron club (which is also highly figurative.)
A thousand years of being disciplined is not merciful either.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyN
And as I have already said, God saving all does work perfectly well with Matthew 7:21-23 and 13:24-30.
You haven't already said it beforehand but now maybe you are at least willing to address it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyN
The kingdom of the heavens will be set up on the earth and will be inaugurated when Christ returns. This is not about "going to heaven."
Which you fail because to don't bother with the key part matthew 7:23.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyN
There will come a day when all mankind, much later, will all acclaim Jesus Christ is Lord and it will be to the glory of God, the Father (Philippians 2:8-11). Remember, Sharon, no one can say "Jesus is Lord except by holy spirit" (1 Cor.12:3) especially when it is not done in hypocrisy as in Matthew 7:21,22. The holy spirit is in all mankind at the juncture of the Philippian passage.
Assuming once again. Nowhere does that passage in whole matthew (7:21-23) say anything about these people being hypocrites. Jesus judges them harshly, but the real reason is unknown. Even still, they are clearly not part of the saved.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyN
This parable is concerning the time before the 1000 years is set up. When Christ comes back He will thrust out of the kingdom all doing lawlessness and they will enter into a furnace of fire (a highly figurative usage of fiery trials). When Israel was held captive in Egypt for 400 years the Bible says she was in an iron furnace. Was there literal fire? Was all of Egypt on fire for 400 years? Did anyone get burnt?
Assumptions, assumptions. As if it were even needing an explanation jesus already gives one anyway in matthew 13:36-43 which presents a striking division between the saved and the unsaved.

Like I actally see fire as being literal in the first place as though jesus is really talking about farming techniques. The Jews were being trapped in the hopeless situation of slavery which is another torture that god witnessed, this only for 400 years until he couldn't stand the innocent cries of his children any longer. Another fine example of the ultimate loving parent.
sharon45 is offline  
Old 12-29-2006, 05:58 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southwest, US
Posts: 8,759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyN
That's funny, I didn't know the Bible had such glaring contradictions in it. God says He will save all mankind in 1 Timothy 2:4 because Christ ransomed all mankind (1 Tim.2:6) and yet you say you have found a passage that contradict that. My my my. Douglas, Luke 24:16 does not say "wedding banquet" as you suggest. It is only about a man making a great dinner and inviting guests to it. Some cannot come. Others do. The parable (and that is all it is) is about being a disciple of Christ.
That is the beauty of a contradiction, they can't be explained away. The gospels contradict paul and vice-versa.

This is just another explanation telling about the separation between the saved and the unsaved.
sharon45 is offline  
Old 12-30-2006, 03:27 AM   #18
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MiChIgAn
Posts: 493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyN View Post
Mat 13:24-30 Another parable He places before them, saying "Likened was the kingdom of the heavens to a man sowing ideal seed in his own field." (25) Yet, while the men are drowsing, his enemy came and sows darnel over amidst the grain, and came away." (26) Now, when the blade germinates and produces fruit, then appeared also the darnel." (27) Now, approaching, the slaves of the householder said to him, 'Lord, do you not sow ideal seed in your field? Whence, then, has it darnel?'" (28) Now he averred to them, 'A man, an enemy, does this.' Now the slaves are saying to him, 'Do you, then, want us to come away that we should be culling them?'" (29) Yet he is averring, 'By no means, lest at some time, while culling the darnel, you should be rooting up the grain at the same time with it." (30) Leave both to grow up together until the harvest, and in the season of the harvest I shall be declaring to the reapers, 'Cull first the darnel, and bind them into bundles to burn them up. Yet the grain gather into my barn.'"

This parable is concerning the time before the 1000 years is set up. When Christ comes back He will thrust out of the kingdom all doing lawlessness and they will enter into a furnace of fire (a highly figurative usage of fiery trials). When Israel was held captive in Egypt for 400 years the Bible says she was in an iron furnace. Was there literal fire? Was all of Egypt on fire for 400 years? Did anyone get burnt?

Douglas replies:
This is a very .... (ahem!).... creative interpretation of this parable. TonyN, have you ever played a game called Balderdash! You should. You'd be very good at it.
Thank you Douglas. I'm sure I would be good at that game.

Quote:
You might also consider that this parable means exactly what it says: God lets the non-believers (ie. the weeds) live amongst the believers (ie. the grain) on earth, but will eventually sort us out in heavan and send us non-believers to hell (ie. burns them up).
Please note that this judging occurrs when Christ comes back on the earth. It is not about heaven or hell. Matthew 25:31 concerns Christ judging the nations when He returns to the earth. It says nothing about this taking place in heaven.

Please also notice when the judging of the tares takes place:

Mat 13:39 Now the enemy who sows them is the Adversary. Now the harvest is the conclusion of the eon. Now the reapers are messengers.

The phrase "the harvest is the conclusion of the eon" is important. We are in "the eon" which is "the present wicked eon" (Gal.1:4). This eon we are in preceeds "the eon to come" . . . Mar 10:30 "who should not be getting back a hundredfold now, in this era, houses and brothers and sisters and mother and father and children and fields, with persecutions, and in the coming eon, life eonian."

The eon to come is the 1000 year eon or age.

Notice more:
Mat 13:41 The Son of Mankind shall be dispatching His messengers, and they shall be culling out of His kingdom all the snares and those doing lawlessness,

Surely you don't believe that "His kingdom" is "heaven" in the passage in question. How could all those sinners be in heaven that He is going to kick out?

So judgment begins at the house of the Lord where Christ casts out of the 1000 year kingdom all doing lawlessness. Then He judges nations as to their treatment of His brethren in Matthew 25:31-46.

Quote:
Are you suggesting that "fire" in this parable is intended as a figurative representation indicating that non-believers will be enslaved for all eternity instead of tortured?
The fire surely is figurative. Just as the furnace of fire in Egypt was figurative. Egypt was not a literal furnace of iron in which hundreds of thousands of Jews were held. Neither was Egypt on fire for 400 years. It is just that the hardships were like fire.
No, no one is enslaved for eternity to any hardship. That would contradict 1 Timothy 2:4-6; 4:10; Col.1:20; Romans 5:18,19; 1 Corinthians 15:22-28 to name a few. It all takes place within the eons or ages. No eon or age is eternal. Therefore it is impossible for chastening to be eternal.
TonyN is offline  
Old 12-30-2006, 03:42 AM   #19
DBT
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: ɹǝpunuʍop puɐן ǝɥʇ
Posts: 17,906
Default

The Greek phrase for "forever and ever" is used in describing God's eternal state and in the verses on the duration of eternal damnation.


"And if your hand or your foot causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it from you; it is better for you to enter life crippled or lame, than having two hands or two feet, to be cast into the eternal fire," (Matt. 18:8).

"And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life" (Matt. 25:46).

"And these will pay the penalty of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power," (2 Thess. 1:9).
"Just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities around them, since they in the same way as these indulged in gross immorality and went after strange flesh, are exhibited as an example, in undergoing the punishment of eternal fire" (Jude 7).

for whom the black darkness has been reserved forever," (Jude12-13).

"Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only God, be honor and glory forever and ever. Amen," (1 Tim. 1:17).
". . . To Him who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb, be blessing and honor and glory and dominion forever and ever" (Rev. 5:13).

"And a second time they said, "Hallelujah! Her smoke rises up forever and ever" (Rev. 19:3).

"And the devil who deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are also; and they will be tormented day and night forever and ever" (Rev. 20:10).
DBT is offline  
Old 12-30-2006, 05:10 AM   #20
Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cylon Occupied Texas, but a Michigander @ heart
Posts: 10,326
Default

I don't know. I found it ironic that a Christian found a mistranslated word and uses it to further his ministry. Tony, why not spend some time in the Biblical Criticism and History forum, where you may read about hundreds of mistranslated words and phrases.
Gawen is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:46 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.