![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: On the fringes of the Lake District, UK
Posts: 9,528
|
![]()
I am gonna send this to BC and H
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pueblo, CO
Posts: 1,794
|
![]()
I read about the 616/666 issue in Asimov's Guide to the Bible over ten years ago
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
![]()
I'm more interested in this:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Indianaplolis
Posts: 4,998
|
![]()
According to preterists, the Latin numerical equivalent for NERO is 616. they say the 616 variants and indicate that the early church definitely thought that Nero was the antichrist.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,490
|
![]()
I do not understand why this has been termed "new"...it is not. Sensationalism... :banghead:
Anyway, here is a link showing papyrus manuscript p115 which contains the number 616. To non-geeks, it is in the third visible line of writing from the top, next to the right side of the fragment, and looks like XIC with a bar over the top. Pictures of p115 have even been on the web for at least two or three years, I believe. Pic of p115 w/ 616 for number of the beast |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
![]()
This poster agrees with you, Haran: Unholy Hype
The key seems to be that Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
|
![]()
I think in Hebrew the transliteration of Neron caeser adds up to 666.
In Latin Nero Caeser adds up to 616. Don't know if this is true. Here is a link Apparently a ccording to Wikipedia Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|