Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
12-30-2004, 03:30 PM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
|
No confirmation that James existed?
http://www.beliefnet.com/story/115/story_11561_1.html
Witherington writes about the ossuary ' It would confirm that James existed, was someone important, and was the brother of another early Jew who was very important--Jesus.' Presumably if the ossuary is false, that means that Witherington has no confirmation that James existed, or at least that Witherington has doubts that James existed. After all , how could the ossuary have confirmed something that had already been confirmed? |
12-30-2004, 03:49 PM | #2 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
This is an old story. Even the more up to date reference in the comments was posted here a few weeks ago.
But going back to that time, I suspect that Witherington would like you to think that other people had doubts about James' existence, which have now been put to rest (just like Pilates' existence was finally proved (when the monument with his name was found) to those unknown skeptics who had not read Josephus. And once you get into the habit of realizing that dubious things can be true, you can move on to accept other dubious propositions. |
12-30-2004, 04:01 PM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
|
So the ossuary confirmed nothing?
What about the ossuary showing 'The language of the Holy family and the earliest Jewish Christians in Jerusalem was, as we have long thought, Aramaic, not Hebrew or Greek.'? Guess that is now up for grabs as well. I was waiting for Witherington to write articles saying that there was now no confirmation that James existed. Slaps head for being so silly. |
12-30-2004, 04:18 PM | #4 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Silly you. Witherington believes the ossuary is genuine. Withingington believes that the Shroud of Turin is genuine 1st c. Palestinian, and that Jesus' blood can be extracted from it. He's not about to write that anything is subject to doubt.
|
12-30-2004, 08:06 PM | #5 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: KY
Posts: 415
|
I tend to doubt that Witherington is the kind of guy who's going to voice any sorts of doubts along these lines. The agenda seems to be set from the top of his institution, as indicated here .
This is a very small institution, in an even smaller community, in an extremely conservative part of the US. He'd probably be drawn and quartered in front of the local Wal Mart if he strayed too far from the Statement of Faith. Believe me, I know - I live about five miles from the place. |
12-31-2004, 04:10 AM | #6 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: .
Posts: 1,014
|
I like this piece on the second page of the article
Quote:
|
|
12-31-2004, 04:50 AM | #7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
|
Quote:
|
|
12-31-2004, 05:03 AM | #8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: .
Posts: 1,014
|
Quote:
|
|
12-31-2004, 05:40 AM | #9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
not without Jeebus!
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|