FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-30-2004, 03:30 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default No confirmation that James existed?

http://www.beliefnet.com/story/115/story_11561_1.html

Witherington writes about the ossuary ' It would confirm that James existed, was someone important, and was the brother of another early Jew who was very important--Jesus.'

Presumably if the ossuary is false, that means that Witherington has no confirmation that James existed, or at least that Witherington has doubts that James existed.

After all , how could the ossuary have confirmed something that had already been confirmed?
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 12-30-2004, 03:49 PM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

This is an old story. Even the more up to date reference in the comments was posted here a few weeks ago.

But going back to that time, I suspect that Witherington would like you to think that other people had doubts about James' existence, which have now been put to rest (just like Pilates' existence was finally proved (when the monument with his name was found) to those unknown skeptics who had not read Josephus.

And once you get into the habit of realizing that dubious things can be true, you can move on to accept other dubious propositions.
Toto is offline  
Old 12-30-2004, 04:01 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default

So the ossuary confirmed nothing?

What about the ossuary showing 'The language of the Holy family and the earliest Jewish Christians in Jerusalem was, as we have long thought, Aramaic, not Hebrew or Greek.'? Guess that is now up for grabs as well.

I was waiting for Witherington to write articles saying that there was now no confirmation that James existed. Slaps head for being so silly.
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 12-30-2004, 04:18 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Silly you. Witherington believes the ossuary is genuine. Withingington believes that the Shroud of Turin is genuine 1st c. Palestinian, and that Jesus' blood can be extracted from it. He's not about to write that anything is subject to doubt.
Toto is offline  
Old 12-30-2004, 08:06 PM   #5
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: KY
Posts: 415
Default

I tend to doubt that Witherington is the kind of guy who's going to voice any sorts of doubts along these lines. The agenda seems to be set from the top of his institution, as indicated here .

This is a very small institution, in an even smaller community, in an extremely conservative part of the US. He'd probably be drawn and quartered in front of the local Wal Mart if he strayed too far from the Statement of Faith. Believe me, I know - I live about five miles from the place.
Vivisector is offline  
Old 12-31-2004, 04:10 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: .
Posts: 1,014
Default

I like this piece on the second page of the article

Quote:
So James believed Jesus was the Messiah?
James did become a believer. In the 1 Corinthians passage, Paul confirms that the risen Jesus appeared to him. After that we find him in Acts 1.14 and afterwards as a leader in the Jerusalem church
So prior to his brothers resurrection James thought the miracles were phony stage magic ,his mother was a liar regarding the virgin birth and his father Joseph was a cuckold?
Lucretius is offline  
Old 12-31-2004, 04:50 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucretius

So prior to his brothers resurrection James thought the miracles were phony stage magic ,his mother was a liar regarding the virgin birth and his father Joseph was a cuckold?
Yes. He had grown-up watching his brothers literally Christ-like behaviour and never noticed anything unusual about the one person he knew that had never sinned, and had never (unlike all other Jews) made a sin offering, or prayed for forgiveness.
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 12-31-2004, 05:03 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: .
Posts: 1,014
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Carr
Yes. He had grown-up watching his brothers literally Christ-like behaviour and never noticed anything unusual about the one person he knew that had never sinned, and had never (unlike all other Jews) made a sin offering, or prayed for forgiveness.
Its a wonder they let him cross the road on his own without someone holding his hand
Lucretius is offline  
Old 12-31-2004, 05:40 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

not without Jeebus!
Chris Weimer is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:54 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.