FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-06-2008, 05:33 AM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default Was Jesus buried in Joseph of Arimathaea's tomb?

I look forward to reading comments from readers.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 06:40 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bordeaux France
Posts: 2,796
Default

Isaiah 53,9 (New American Standard)
His grave was assigned with wicked men,
Yet He was with a rich man in His death,
Because He had done no violence,
Nor was there any deceit in His mouth.
Huon is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 06:58 AM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Huon1
Isaiah 53:9 (New American Standard)

"His grave was assigned with wicked men,
Yet He was with a rich man in His death,
Because He had done no violence,
Nor was there any deceit in His mouth."
Yes, that is a good example of a self-fulfilled prophecy, just like Micah 5:2, and just like the Partition of Palestine.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 06:59 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,061
Default

Quote:
Was Jesus buried in Joseph of Arimathaea's tomb?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post
I look forward to reading comments from readers.
Hi

No, he was only laid in Joseph of Arimathaea's tomb, so that he does not get suffocated in a grave. Jesus was in a near-dead position due to injuries inflicted on the Cross, he needed immediate treatment and care whcih was provided by his friends under supervision of Nicodemus a physician. Since he never died in the first place on the Cross; so there is no question of his resurrection or ascension.

He later migrated secretly alongwith Mary and some very close disciples to India. He died at the age of 120 years according to one tradition. He got married and had off-spring there. He is buried in a tomb in Mohallah Khanyar, Sirinagar, Kashmir, India. For details in this connection , one may access:
http://www.alislam.org/library/books...dia/index.html a book by the PromisedMessiah 1835-1908.

Thanks

I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
paarsurrey is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 07:06 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,691
Default

In my mind, any new theory needs to accomplish two things: 1) Be a consistent, supported theory and 2) have sufficient evidence so that it can replace the previous theory.

I think the Joseph of Arimathaea's tomb burial is sorta the ID of atheists. The location where Jesus was/is buried has been known for around 2000 years, and I don't think that some vague writings on a wall constitute sufficient evidence to challenge that position.
xunzian is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 07:15 AM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xunzian
The location where Jesus was/is buried has been known for around 2,000 years.......
Please quote your sources.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 07:35 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,691
Default

Church of the Holy Sepulchre. Been a sacred place for Christians since the Cruxifiction. Check it out. This page cites some of the sources.
xunzian is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 07:59 AM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xunzian
Church of the Holy Sepulchre. Been a sacred place for Christians since the Cruxifixion. Check it out. This page cites some of the sources.
Why couldn't the body have been moved?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 08:14 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,691
Default

It certainly could have, but that's the sort of straw-grabbing that ID-proponents use all the time. We can talk about a million "could haves" but those are rarely solid foundations. That is, unless a conclusion has already been reached and the "could haves" are used with scant evidence to justify that conclusion . . . hardly the direction we want to go, right? The whole idea is to be better than that.
xunzian is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 08:53 AM   #10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xunzian
[The body] certainly could have [been moved], but that's the sort of straw-grabbing that ID-proponents use all the time. We can talk about a million "could haves" but those are rarely solid foundations. That is, unless a conclusion has already been reached and the "could haves" are used with scant evidence to justify that conclusion . . . hardly the direction we want to go, right? The whole idea is to be better than that.
What do you propose actually happened at the tomb?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:30 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.