FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-15-2006, 11:12 AM   #111
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: England
Posts: 688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post

At this juncture, there would appear to be only two explanations;
1. YHWH, and The Prophets of old were mistaken, and thus YAH'hoshua The Messiah was mistaken, and because nothing significant along this line that has ever yet happened, nothing ever will happen. (the "unbelievers" or "skeptical" view)
2. There just remains a few earth shaking events to happen, and then He will come, just as He has said. (the "believers", that "hold fast" and "keep His words" view)
How about the Old Testament prophets were accurate, but Jesus was a false Messiah giving false prophecy which misused (genuine) Old Testament prophecy?
Decypher is offline  
Old 09-15-2006, 11:22 AM   #112
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: England
Posts: 688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
2. There just remains a few earth shaking events to happen, and then He will come, just as He has said.
Verses which suggest that all the events in Matthew 24 should have happened close together in time:

Quote:
But beware of men: for they will deliver you up to the councils, and they will scourge you in their synagogues; And ye shall be brought before governors and kings for my sake, for a testimony against them and the Gentiles. But when they deliver you up, take no thought how or what ye shall speak: for it shall be given you in that same hour what ye shall speak. For it is not ye that speak, but the Spirit of your Father which speaketh in you. And the brother shall deliver up the brother to death, and the father the child: and the children shall rise up against their parents, and cause them to be put to death. And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake: but he that endureth to the end shall be saved. But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another: for verily I say unto you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come. (Matthew 10:17-23 KJV)
The "Son of Man" will come within the lifetime of those going from city to city to avoid persecution.
Decypher is offline  
Old 09-15-2006, 11:39 AM   #113
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: England
Posts: 688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
In conclusion, no amount of argument about how Matt 24 is to be interpreted is going to cause them that believe the predictions of The Prophets, to abandon their hope in the eventual fulfillment of all that has been predicted of old.
I doubt this claim will hold true for everyone. Presumably it is possible that some who "believe the prophets" may be persuaded by argument that Jesus gave false prophecy.

But anyway, what should properly concern us is the truth of the issue, not whether "believers" can be persuaded by argument.
Decypher is offline  
Old 09-15-2006, 12:40 PM   #114
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: England
Posts: 688
Default

And Sheshbazzar, are you really following what the Old Testament says? We are told that one criteria for whether someone speaks for God is whether their prophecies come true, (Deuteronomy 18:21-22). It doesn't say that if someone claims to speak for God we should simply have faith in them. Should we not judge Jesus on this criteria given to us by the Bible? Your attitude seems to be that argument about Matthew 24 could never persuade you that Jesus was a false prophet, and that attitude seems to go against the Bible.
Decypher is offline  
Old 09-15-2006, 06:11 PM   #115
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Decypher View Post
This line of argument is fallacious. That Jesus qualified his coming to be "only after" certain events is irrelevant. That doesn't save him from being a false prophet if he also predicted his coming, and those preceding events, would take place within a certain time. (Which has now elapsed.)
Back again to where we began this debate, We still maintain that contrary to the interpretation that you are employing, YAH'hoshua The Messiah DID NOT predict that His coming would take place within any certain time, other than that described by the saying "WHEN you shall see these things begin come to pass, THEN lift up your heads; for your redemption draws near." Again, He never predicted His second coming as preceding that time in which "the sun and moon are darkened, and the stars fall from heaven." that time period HAS NOT elapsed, because these predicted dramatic "end time" events have not yet taken place.
Quote:
How about the Old Testament prophets were accurate, but Jesus was a false Messiah giving false prophecy which misused (genuine) Old Testament prophecy?
If the Old Testament Prophets were accurate, and their prophecies were "true", and had "came to pass" at any time prior to this present day, All wars and rebellion would have ceased, all men would now acknowledge and worship only YHWH The Holy One of Israel,
The Messiah which they also clearly predict would now rule over all nations,
and every nation formerly the enemy of His people Israel, would be going up to Jerusalem from year to year to keep The Feast of Tabernacles, honoring Him, His Prophets, His people Israel, and His Messiah, and obeying His Laws.
Therefore in as much as NONE of these prophecies has been fulfilled, nor "came to pass", regardless of whether YAH'hoshua The Messiah "was a false messiah giving false prophecy", your query as stated above presents an impossible option.
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar
In conclusion, no amount of argument about how Matt 24 is to be interpreted is going to cause them that believe the predictions of The Prophets, to abandon their hope in the eventual fulfillment of all that has been predicted of old.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Decypher
I doubt this claim will hold true for everyone. Presumably it is possible that some who "believe the prophets" may be persuaded by argument that Jesus gave false prophecy.
But anyway, what should properly concern us is the truth of the issue, not whether "believers" can be persuaded by argument.
If they actually "believe the prophets" then they must agree to the premise that the things the Prophets prophesied must "come to pass", otherwise their "belief" is but a sham.
If they say that all that the Prophets have prophesied has already "came to pass" then it is upon their shoulders to prove the truth of such allegations;
That all wars have ceased, that all men now worship YHWH The Holy One of Israel, and His Messiah now rules over all men everywhere, and etcetera.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Decypher
are you really following what the Old Testament says? We are told that one criteria for whether someone speaks for God is whether their prophecies come true, (Deuteronomy 18:21-22).
As I pointed out above, most of the greater prophecies appearing within "The Old Testament" still do remain unfulfilled, thus the conclusion only allows that prophecies that were given by YHWH, and by His prophets, either have failed, were false, or simply have not yet been fulfilled.
As skeptics and the unbelievers, you are entitled to hold the first two.
"Believers" however, cannot accept those premises, and still rightly nor honestly claim to believe His words, nor be believers.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 09-16-2006, 10:49 AM   #116
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: England
Posts: 688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post

If the Old Testament Prophets were accurate, and their prophecies were "true", and had "came to pass" at any time prior to this present day, All wars and rebellion would have ceased, all men would now acknowledge and worship only YHWH The Holy One of Israel,
The Messiah which they also clearly predict would now rule over all nations,
and every nation formerly the enemy of His people Israel, would be going up to Jerusalem from year to year to keep The Feast of Tabernacles, honoring Him, His Prophets, His people Israel, and His Messiah, and obeying His Laws.
Therefore in as much as NONE of these prophecies has been fulfilled, nor "came to pass", regardless of whether YAH'hoshua The Messiah "was a false messiah giving false prophecy", your query as stated above presents an impossible option.
I never suggested that Old Testament prophecies had all "come to pass" in the world today! Where did you get that idea from? I only suggested the possible option that they were accurate, whereas Jesus was a false prophet. Would this not be a possible option?
Decypher is offline  
Old 09-16-2006, 11:00 AM   #117
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: England
Posts: 688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post

If they actually "believe the prophets" then they must agree to the premise that the things the Prophets prophesied must "come to pass", otherwise their "belief" is but a sham.
True, but there is no reason why they can't "believe the prophets" but then change their minds about it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
If they say that all that the Prophets have prophesied has already "came to pass" then it is upon their shoulders to prove the truth of such allegations;
That all wars have ceased, that all men now worship YHWH The Holy One of Israel, and His Messiah now rules over all men everywhere, and etcetera.
What?
Decypher is offline  
Old 09-16-2006, 11:09 AM   #118
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: England
Posts: 688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post

As I pointed out above, most of the greater prophecies appearing within "The Old Testament" still do remain unfulfilled, thus the conclusion only allows that prophecies that were given by YHWH, and by His prophets, either have failed, were false, or simply have not yet been fulfilled.
As skeptics and the unbelievers, you are entitled to hold the first two.
"Believers" however, cannot accept those premises, and still rightly nor honestly claim to believe His words, nor be believers.
This doesn't seem to be a relevant reply to what was said. Let me quote it again:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Decypher View Post
And Sheshbazzar, are you really following what the Old Testament says? We are told that one criteria for whether someone speaks for God is whether their prophecies come true, (Deuteronomy 18:21-22). It doesn't say that if someone claims to speak for God we should simply have faith in them. Should we not judge Jesus on this criteria given to us by the Bible? Your attitude seems to be that argument about Matthew 24 could never persuade you that Jesus was a false prophet, and that attitude seems to go against the Bible.
Decypher is offline  
Old 09-16-2006, 11:37 AM   #119
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: England
Posts: 688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Back again to where we began this debate, We still maintain that contrary to the interpretation that you are employing, YAH'hoshua The Messiah DID NOT predict that His coming would take place within any certain time, other than that described by the saying "WHEN you shall see these things begin come to pass, THEN lift up your heads; for your redemption draws near." Again, He never predicted His second coming as preceding that time in which "the sun and moon are darkened, and the stars fall from heaven." that time period HAS NOT elapsed, because these predicted dramatic "end time" events have not yet taken place.

Jesus said, "when ye shall see all these things" to his disciples. But even if we ignore this, we still have every reason to believe that Jesus was talking about "this present generation". (An equivalent prediction made in Matthew 16:27-28, and a similar statement to Matthew 24:34 made in Matthew 23:36 which was clearly about the generation alive at that time.) And if that isn't enough (it should be) we know that the events described in Matthew 24 should have taken place close together in time, (Matthew 10:23). We know that one of the events was certainly in the first century -- the destruction of the second temple -- and so that is when all of the events should have taken place.
Decypher is offline  
Old 09-16-2006, 05:16 PM   #120
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Decypher View Post
I never suggested that Old Testament prophecies had all "come to pass" in the world today! Where did you get that idea from?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Decypher in post #111
"How about the Old Testament prophets were accurate,"...?
I "got that idea" from you asking this question;
Quote:
Originally Posted by Decypher
"How about the Old Testament prophets were accurate,"...?
Perhaps it is incomprehensible to you, that "If the Old Testament prophets were accurate", then the things that they prophesied would be accurate and need to "come to pass", for otherwise they would NOT be accurate.
Appears that you cannot even comprehend the implications of your own words. And I am supposed to accept your reasoning?
Sheshbazzar is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:12 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.