FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-06-2007, 06:23 PM   #51
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes the Cynic View Post
No. Strobel's argument is that the alleged maryrdom of the apostles is evidence for the resurrection (i.e. for the historicity of the Gospels). Maybe you haven't read it.

The premise for this argument is flawed in that there is no evidence that the apostles either believed in a physical resurrection or that they were martyred for such a belief. The martyrdom traditions are not even Biblical.

I'm trying to get you to see that you're arguing from unsupported premises.
No I’ve never read strobel, but I thought the post was about questions raised about the martyrs that followed Christ.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nemoralis View Post
I just finished Lee Strobel's A Case for Christ. It certainly wasn't astounding by any means...just typical Strobel stuff. But it did raise some questions for me.

For one, why would Jesus' closest followers die for a cause that they made up? It does seem unlikely that the story could be extrapolated so quickly after his death. I'm not as familiar with biblical history as I should be (which is the reason I read Strobel's book) so pardon me if this issue has been beaten to death. I have some other questions too but I'll add those in when they come up. I can't really remember everything at the moment and I don't have the book with me.
I think you’re just trying to change the conversation truthfully.

My ideas are supported in the gospels, but you don’t allow them in your rules of engagement. And your not understanding me about the differences between Socrates and Christ. It’s like I’m holding up an orange and an apple and asking you if you see the difference and your yelling at me they’re both fruit, their both fruit, over and over again.
Elijah is offline  
Old 02-06-2007, 06:29 PM   #52
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: BFE
Posts: 416
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
I thought the post was about why Jesus’ disciples decided to die for their cause, but ok sorry.
Okay, Elijah. I'll call you on this claim. Show the evidence to prove that the disciples died martyr's deaths.

From a brief search, I came up with Origen and Eusebius as the primary information we have supporting this claim.

Origen was early third century. And Eusebius was early fourth century.

So, why should we think that these accounts are reliable? We have nothing to show that these stories survived by anything other than word of mouth. For several hundred years.

You don't suppose any of those stories got better with the telling do you?

Did you never play a game of telephone as a kid?
Mythra is offline  
Old 02-06-2007, 06:34 PM   #53
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pharoah View Post
According to the OT, Samson willingly died for the Israelite cause. Does he count? And what about the Bethlehem babies that gave up their lives so that Baby Jesus could live and a prophecy could be fulfilled? Surely they're the first Christian martyrs?

You also seem to have missed driver8's post where he refuted the notion that Jesus died a willing death.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark 14
35 And he went forward a little, and fell on the ground, and prayed that, if it were possible, the hour might pass from him.

36 And he said, Abba, Father, all things are possible unto thee; take away this cup from me: nevertheless not what I will, but what thou wilt.

Does this sound like someone willing to die? The fact that the other gospels, all written after Mark, "cleaned" up this passage is not very helpful to your thesis either.
Please read back to what I’ve already said about how loosely the word Martyr is used. Samson and babies, really?

I think that passage is a man who fully knows he is about to die and more then that knows he has to. Doesn’t mean he wasn’t afraid of his approaching death, but he was aware of what his death could and did mean.

I didn’t think that driver8's post was a serious inquiry.
Elijah is offline  
Old 02-06-2007, 06:35 PM   #54
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 8,524
Default

God! Those stupid 7 brothers.

The only good thing about that story is at least they were all tortured to death, the fucking fanatics.
mirage is offline  
Old 02-06-2007, 06:38 PM   #55
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mythra View Post
Okay, Elijah. I'll call you on this claim. Show the evidence to prove that the disciples died martyr's deaths.
The Stoning of Stephen
acts 7:54 Now when they heard these things they were enraged, and they ground their teeth at him. 55But he, full of the Holy Spirit, gazed into heaven and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing at the right hand of God. 56And he said, "Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God." 57But they cried out with a loud voice and stopped their ears and rushed together[b] at him. 58Then they cast him out of the city and stoned him. And the witnesses laid down their garments at the feet of a young man named Saul. 59And as they were stoning Stephen, he called out, "Lord Jesus, receive my spirit." 60And falling to his knees he cried out with a loud voice, "Lord, do not hold this sin against them." And when he had said this, he fell asleep.


The moment that inspired Paul.
Elijah is offline  
Old 02-06-2007, 06:45 PM   #56
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
Quote:
Show the evidence to prove that the disciples died martyr's deaths.
The Stoning of Stephen
Stephen was not a disciple. Try again.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 02-06-2007, 06:48 PM   #57
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
No I’ve never read strobel, but I thought the post was about questions raised about the martyrs that followed Christ.
Like I said, it's an argument Strobel uses to support a historical resurrection and the reason it fails is because it's based on facts not in evidence.
Quote:
I think you’re just trying to change the conversation truthfully.
I think you're just inexperienced with the discussion. This martyred apostle agument is a common one. The rebuttals have become routine.
Quote:
My ideas are supported in the gospels, but you don’t allow them in your rules of engagement.
The historicity of the Gospels is precisely the subject for debate. It would be circular to accept the historical claims of the gospels as proof for themselves. It's a common mistake made by neophyte apologists.
Quote:
And your not understanding me about the differences between Socrates and Christ. It’s like I’m holding up an orange and an apple and asking you if you see the difference and your yelling at me they’re both fruit, their both fruit, over and over again.
You're holding up two apples and insisting that one of them is an orange.
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 02-06-2007, 06:49 PM   #58
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: BFE
Posts: 416
Default

Okay -we'll ignore that Stephen wasn't one of the twelve apostles. (you did know that, didn't you? ) And we'll pretend that Acts is historical. Show evidence of the other 10 martyrdoms. Bottom line - you can't. Because they rely on nothing more than tradition. Even Fox's Book of Martyrs admits that.

So, when someone says "why would the apostles die for a lie" - it's quite easy (and likely true) to say they didn't.
Mythra is offline  
Old 02-06-2007, 06:50 PM   #59
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
The Stoning of Stephen
acts 7:54 Now when they heard these things they were enraged, and they ground their teeth at him. 55But he, full of the Holy Spirit, gazed into heaven and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing at the right hand of God. 56And he said, "Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God." 57But they cried out with a loud voice and stopped their ears and rushed together[b] at him. 58Then they cast him out of the city and stoned him. And the witnesses laid down their garments at the feet of a young man named Saul. 59And as they were stoning Stephen, he called out, "Lord Jesus, receive my spirit." 60And falling to his knees he cried out with a loud voice, "Lord, do not hold this sin against them." And when he had said this, he fell asleep.


The moment that inspired Paul.
I've already dealt with this. Stephen was not an apostle. Strobel's argument is that the apostles were willing to die for talking about something that they SAW. Stephen is not alleged to have been a witness of anything so his alleged martyrdom is of no use to Strobel's case.
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 02-06-2007, 06:55 PM   #60
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
Stephen was not a disciple. Try again.

spin
I like Stephen, I'll stick with him. Peter's there if you need him. But Stephen is clearly imitating Christ. The title Stephen went by back then in his relationship with Christ is irrelevant.

From wiki
A phrase in the last chapter of the Gospel of John refers to Peter’s martyrdom by crucifixion, though without reference to its location: "'…when you are old you will stretch out your hands, and another will gird you and take you where you do not want to go.' Jesus said this to indicate the kind of death by which Peter would glorify God" (John 21:18-19).
Elijah is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:41 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.