FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Elsewhere > ~Elsewhere~
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-07-2007, 08:47 PM   #1
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Asia
Posts: 227
Default Is Evolution Theory really natural?

Evolution Theory (ET) is not natural science. It is supernatural, fable, mythological, and pokemon-styled- science.

I can prove it.

Now, I am a Christian.
samurai is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 08:51 PM   #2
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Objective Reality
Posts: 296
Default

Okay, prove it.

Or is this some kind of joke?
Thinine is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 08:51 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samurai View Post
Evolution Theory (ET) is not natural science. It is supernatural, fable, mythological, and pokemon-styled- science.

I can prove it.

Now, I am a Christian.
Please go right ahead. Your Nobel prize awaits.

Of course, you might want to make sure you are referring to the actual Theory of Evolution, rather than the ridiculous caricature that is presented by biblical creationists. There is a huge difference.
Gullwind is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 08:54 PM   #4
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Bloomington, MN
Posts: 2,209
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samurai View Post
Evolution Theory (ET) is not natural science. It is supernatural, fable, mythological, and pokemon-styled- science.

I can prove it.

Now, I am a Christian.
Indeed, that is what all such "proofs" boil down to in the final analysis. Kudos to you for cutting right to the chase.
Silent Dave is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 08:57 PM   #5
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Asia
Posts: 227
Default Before That

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gullwind View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by samurai View Post
Evolution Theory (ET) is not natural science. It is supernatural, fable, mythological, and pokemon-styled- science.

I can prove it.

Now, I am a Christian.
Please go right ahead. Your Nobel prize awaits.

Of course, you might want to make sure you are referring to the actual Theory of Evolution, rather than the ridiculous caricature that is presented by biblical creationists. There is a huge difference.
Before I prove it, let me ask you some questions.

1. Do you believe that Evolution Theory is really basing its explanation naturally? I mean, is ET (Evolution Theory) really the sole natural explanation of nature?

2. If you say yes, then, do you have a concrete and hard evidences for ET, to be labeled as "naturalistic" science?

I can not find one.
samurai is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 09:00 PM   #6
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Asia
Posts: 227
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thinine View Post
Okay, prove it.

Or is this some kind of joke?

It is not a joke when life and death of every human depends upon the truth of science. If ET (Evolution Theory) is really natural in nature, we ned to follow it and endorse it.

If proven not, we need to stop it.
samurai is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 09:02 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: California
Posts: 1,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samurai View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thinine View Post
Okay, prove it.

Or is this some kind of joke?

It is not a joke when life and death of every human depends upon the truth of science. If ET (Evolution Theory) is really natural in nature, we ned to follow it and endorse it.

If proven not, we need to stop it.
You said you can prove Evolutionary Theory is supernatural (and a host of other things).

If you can, you will easily gain a nobel prize.

Now do so.

JaronK
JaronK is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 09:06 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samurai View Post
Before I prove it, let me ask you some questions.

1. Do you believe that Evolution Theory is really basing its explanation naturally? I mean, is ET (Evolution Theory) really the sole natural explanation of nature?

2. If you say yes, then, do you have a concrete and hard evidences for ET, to be labeled as "naturalistic" science?
1. Yes, the Theory of Evolution uses natural explanations. That's what science does. No, it is not the sole explanation of nature. Chemical laws, physical laws, and many other branches of science contribute to our understanding of nature. Ignore them at your peril.

2. Yes. Talk Origins would be a good place to start.

Quote:
I can not find one.
Where have you looked?
Gullwind is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 09:12 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: California
Posts: 2,215
Default

Are you the same samurai who posts at RD.net, and who has had multiple threads there locked for repeated spamming of these same goofy claims and refusing to look at all the contrary evidence presented?

Just curious.
Occam's Aftershave is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 09:13 PM   #10
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Objective Reality
Posts: 296
Default

Don't let him change the dialog, keep asking him to prove it. Otherwise this thread is pointless.
Thinine is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:50 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.