Juma

No, I am not. To teach is to give an orientation of the subject, not to thouroughly argument for it. Not until the student knows enough to orient herself. When the you recognize the subject you can start to dissect its logical structure and then you need to be able scrutinize every argument in detail. Thus every single step must, at least in principle, be available. Thus in this case authority is not anyones master. In this way science is truly democratic even if there are no elections.

Jaybees

Here I expected to be sent to authorities on god's qualities, not to an expert on why people waste their time reporting on god's qualities.

Evidently, from your viewpoint, there are some subjects not amenable to clarification by authorities.

outhouse

Please pay attention before you post, I have never stated otherwise.

In fact I have already stated probably multiple times, one must use "appeal to authority" wisely and is not a catch all. :constern01:


I asked what would you like to know, what specific detail exactly are you lacking knowledge here.

outhouse

You will never be able to "word" your way around ignorance VS knowledge