![]()  | 
	
		Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
		
			
  | 
	|||||||
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#31 | |
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2000 
				Location: Los Angeles area 
				
				
					Posts: 40,549
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Messianic Claimants by one account 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#32 | |
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Feb 2006 
				Location: the fringe of the caribbean 
				
				
					Posts: 18,988
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#33 | ||
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2004 
				Location: Birmingham UK 
				
				
					Posts: 4,876
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Josephus certainly describes God as the Lord. What he apparently never does in narrative is use 'Lord' as a straight name/synonym for 'God'. In the Septuagint we have continual uses of 'Lord' (Kurios) as a synonym for 'God' (House of the Lord, stood before the Lord, the Lord said, Word of the Lord etc). Josephus in reported speech has characters say 'Lord' when they mean 'God' and he once in a passage based on Isaiah uses 'Lord God' when he means 'God'. But that seems to be as far as it goes. The Septuagint is full of uses of 'of the Lord' (Kurios) as an equivalent to 'of God'. Josephus does not seem to use this construction at all. 'James the brother of the Lord' meaning something like 'James the brother of God' is just not a Josephan way of writing. Andrew Criddle  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#34 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Feb 2005 
				Location: Atlanta 
				
				
					Posts: 2,060
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Surely the Romans would be familiar with the mystery cult useage of the divine Lord (Kyrios/Adonai), son of the supreme deity Theos Pater. Jesus was Lord in the same way that Atargatis, Dea Syria, and Dionysos Dusares were Lord.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#35 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2004 
				Location: Birmingham UK 
				
				
					Posts: 4,876
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 IIUC Zindler's argument is that Josephus originally said "brother of the Lord" without any reference to at all Jesus, ie meaning something like "brother of Yahweh". IMO non-Jewish readers would have found this confusing. Andrew Criddle  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#36 | ||
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Feb 2005 
				Location: Atlanta 
				
				
					Posts: 2,060
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Would they have been confused by the brethren of Lord Mithras? Jake  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#37 | ||
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2003 
				Location: Australia 
				
				
					Posts: 5,714
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#38 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2007 
				Location: Mondcivitan Republic 
				
				
					Posts: 2,550
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			It might be a masonic order. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	http://books.google.com/books?id=ADo...ras%22&f=false Or maybe something to do with Hermetic or modern-day Gnostic types. Maybe he doesn't know either. DCH  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#39 | |
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2002 
				Location: nowhere 
				
				
					Posts: 15,747
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	spin  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
		
  |