FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

View Poll Results: Lord, liar, lunatic or...
Lord 12 5.43%
Liar 2 0.90%
Lunatic 5 2.26%
None of the above: he was probably a cult leader about whom people invented stories after his death 119 53.85%
None of the above: he was a myth 74 33.48%
A combination of lunatic and liar 9 4.07%
Voters: 221. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-17-2005, 09:58 AM   #1
McD
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pueblo, CO
Posts: 1,794
Default Jesus: Lord, lunatic, liar or?????

Ok, so we have all had this question posed to us. Which was he?
McD is offline  
Old 05-17-2005, 12:27 PM   #2
SLD
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 4,109
Default

You know when Fundies pose this question, I always respond that I have met many liars and lunatics in my life, but I've yet to meet one god. History as well has been full of such wierdos proclaiming to be god. Why are they wrong and Jesus right?

That being said I voted for cult leader whom people later made up stories. But that's not entirely correct. My view is that he was probably nothing more than the leader of one of the myriad groups trying to overthrow Roman Rule in the area. I would speculate that his movement was primarily political - not religious.

SLD
SLD is offline  
Old 05-17-2005, 12:56 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,197
Default

I figure if he existed at all, he was a lot like David Koresh

Does that make him a cult leader, or does that make him a lunatic? Both?
Godless Wonder is offline  
Old 05-17-2005, 03:18 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Land of Make Believe
Posts: 781
Default

He was an apocalyptic preacher who preached the imminent coming of the Kingdom of God. He claimed this Kingdom would completely change the world order, and that it was coming either while he was alive or soon after he was killed. So, I suppose he was a cult leader, although I don't think he started a cult (as far as being organized). He was just spreading the news that the world was ending very soon. Anyone seemed to be welcome to accept that and help him spread the news.

Yes, after his death, many stories were made up about him. They took the meager batch of sayings from Jesus they had remembered and embellished them, and added new ones and the religion of Christianity grew from there.
motorhead is offline  
Old 05-17-2005, 08:12 PM   #5
SLD
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 4,109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by motorhead
He was an apocalyptic preacher who preached the imminent coming of the Kingdom of God. He claimed this Kingdom would completely change the world order, and that it was coming either while he was alive or soon after he was killed. So, I suppose he was a cult leader, although I don't think he started a cult (as far as being organized). He was just spreading the news that the world was ending very soon. Anyone seemed to be welcome to accept that and help him spread the news.

Yes, after his death, many stories were made up about him. They took the meager batch of sayings from Jesus they had remembered and embellished them, and added new ones and the religion of Christianity grew from there.
I think too many of us have a modern view of the phrase "Kingdom of God". Hyamm Maccoby points out that in fact the phrase's meaning is more prosaic - the reinstitution of the Davidian line of Kings. It was merely a code word for the overthrow of the hated Roman Rule. Nothing eschatalogical.

SLD
SLD is offline  
Old 05-17-2005, 08:19 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 85
Default

ahh, but either way he was wrong... he didn't really end up doing anything apocalyptic OR political
ImmortalTechnique is offline  
Old 05-18-2005, 02:28 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton, England
Posts: 6,947
Default

I am a tentative Mythicist (i.e. I think he probably didn't exist but do not claim to know that he didn't) so I selected the myth option.

However, since someone wrote the Q sayings, then that person could qualify as the cult leader about which someone invented stories...
Dean Anderson is offline  
Old 05-18-2005, 03:02 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,033
Default

He was just like the dozens of others claiming to be messiahas during this time. He managed to get a small gathering of followers who believed that after his death the kingdom of god would come soon. After his execution his followers became disillusioned that the kingdom of god never came, so they began to tell stories about him. These stories circulated thru oral tradition and a few written sources until the failure of the 1st Jewish revolt against the romans. After the Romans won this is when the gospels started to be written with Mark being written shortly after this war. Over time Christianity branched off from Judiasm but remained relatively a small group. Then Constatine declared about 300 years after Jesus had died to make Christianity the official religion of the Roman empire. And Christianity grew from there.

No he was not crazy or a lier. He was just like any preacher.
Killer Mike is offline  
Old 05-18-2005, 03:43 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Land of Make Believe
Posts: 781
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SLD
I think too many of us have a modern view of the phrase "Kingdom of God". Hyamm Maccoby points out that in fact the phrase's meaning is more prosaic - the reinstitution of the Davidian line of Kings. It was merely a code word for the overthrow of the hated Roman Rule. Nothing eschatalogical.

SLD
I don't think Jesus' main intention was the overthrow of Roman rule. He announced the imminent coming of the Kingdom of God which would completely change the world, which yes, included the Roman rule of the Jews. Jesus preaches about the Kingdom, what it will be like, who will be allowed to enter it, etc. If you read closely his descriptions of how the Kingdom will come to Earth, it's cataclysmic. No one will fail to see it. The problem is he preached that it was coming in his lifetime, and then when he realized he was going to be killed for his preaching, he taught it would come shortly after he died. It turns out, he was wrong.
motorhead is offline  
Old 05-18-2005, 04:10 AM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Even after evaluating Doherty et al. I still think that there was some sort of a Jesus who existed in Palestine around the turn of the 1st millennium.
Chris Weimer is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:37 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.