FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-20-2004, 09:53 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 780
Question So why they lie on Jesus

Jesus never claimed to be the Son of God or the Son of man. And the message among to his sayings aint even as these Christians claim it to be at all.

So what's with the obvious lies?
Sign Related is offline  
Old 12-20-2004, 10:29 AM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

You can't use the Bible to prove that the Bible is true, but can you use the Bible to prove that the Bible is false?

In any case, I think this might do better in GRD.
Toto is offline  
Old 12-20-2004, 11:56 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: VA
Posts: 2,103
Default

News to me. He never said he was Son of God? care to expound?

-Pf
Phishfood is offline  
Old 12-20-2004, 12:05 PM   #4
WCH
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,290
Default

He was hardly explicit on the subject, but implied it... in any case, I wouldn't call it "obvious lies." Saying Jesus opposed homosexuality, etc, however, would be.
WCH is offline  
Old 12-20-2004, 12:09 PM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Alaska!
Posts: 14,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sign Related
Jesus never claimed to be the Son of God or the Son of man. And the message among to his sayings aint even as these Christians claim it to be at all.

So what's with the obvious lies?
Why isn't, "Jesus never claimed to be the Son of God or the Son of man," an obvious lie? If we don't know that he even existed, how can be be sure what he did or didn't claim if he did exist?

Maybe you could reduce your claim to something like, "The bible never says Jesus claimed ...."

crc
Wiploc is offline  
Old 12-20-2004, 12:11 PM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phishfood
News to me. He never said he was Son of God? care to expound?

-Pf
I'd comment that it's quite lost to us as to what Jesus actually said or did not say. In other words, we do not know whether Jesus ever said he was the Son of God or not. There are places in the Gospels where he allegedly hinted that he was the Son of God (see John 3:16), but we don't know whether he actually said those things or if they were later embellishments by those who came to believe he was the Son of God. In any case, there is no record in the NT of Jesus actually saying "I am the Son of God."
Mageth is offline  
Old 12-20-2004, 12:37 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: VA
Posts: 2,103
Default

I had heard that it was common for Jews to refer to themselves as "sons of god," and that it wouldn't have been strange at all for Jesus to say he was a son of god. Now imagine if 'a' and 'the' had somewhere been transposed.

of course, this is just something I had heard, and it doesn't explain why such a fuss would have come from a simple transposition, so if you want to destroy this notion go ahead. i wont take it pesonally.

-Pf

Mageth, thanks for clarifying a bit.
Phishfood is offline  
Old 12-20-2004, 12:52 PM   #8
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

In context, "Son of Man" and "Son of God" are not claims to divinity anyway.

"Son of Man" (or Son of Adam) was an idiomatic way to say "human being." Daniel called the Messiah "One like a son of man" (meaning that the Messiah would be a human being) and somewhere along the line, the phrase became a way to allude to the Messiah but it's pretty hard to tell if any "Son of Man" sayings in the gospels are authentic to Jesus (assuming he exsted at all) and even if they are, whether he meant them to be self-referential or titular or whether he meant them be sayings about people in general.

"Son of God" was used to refer to people who were chosen or favored by God and was associated especially with Kings.

I personally don't believe that Jesus ever claimed to be the Messiah or the King of the Jews (which were really the same claim) but even if he did, those were still not assertions of personal godhood.
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 12-20-2004, 12:52 PM   #9
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 220
Default

In the Gospel of John Jesus refers to himself as the Son or the Son of God in at least the following places: 3:16-18; 5:25; 9:35; 10:36; 11:4. In 10:36, he says
Quote:
Do you say of him whom the Father sanctified and sent into the world, ‘You are blaspheming,’ because I said, ‘I am the Son of God’?
Notsri is offline  
Old 12-20-2004, 12:53 PM   #10
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phishfood
I had heard that it was common for Jews to refer to themselves as "sons of god," and that it wouldn't have been strange at all for Jesus to say he was a son of god. Now imagine if 'a' and 'the' had somewhere been transposed.

of course, this is just something I had heard, and it doesn't explain why such a fuss would have come from a simple transposition, so if you want to destroy this notion go ahead. i wont take it pesonally.

-Pf

Mageth, thanks for clarifying a bit.
There is no "a" in Greek. There is no indefinite article. You can only say "the."
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:39 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.