Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
12-20-2004, 09:53 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 780
|
So why they lie on Jesus
Jesus never claimed to be the Son of God or the Son of man. And the message among to his sayings aint even as these Christians claim it to be at all.
So what's with the obvious lies? |
12-20-2004, 10:29 AM | #2 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
You can't use the Bible to prove that the Bible is true, but can you use the Bible to prove that the Bible is false?
In any case, I think this might do better in GRD. |
12-20-2004, 11:56 AM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: VA
Posts: 2,103
|
News to me. He never said he was Son of God? care to expound?
-Pf |
12-20-2004, 12:05 PM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,290
|
He was hardly explicit on the subject, but implied it... in any case, I wouldn't call it "obvious lies." Saying Jesus opposed homosexuality, etc, however, would be.
|
12-20-2004, 12:09 PM | #5 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Alaska!
Posts: 14,058
|
Quote:
Maybe you could reduce your claim to something like, "The bible never says Jesus claimed ...." crc |
|
12-20-2004, 12:11 PM | #6 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Quote:
|
|
12-20-2004, 12:37 PM | #7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: VA
Posts: 2,103
|
I had heard that it was common for Jews to refer to themselves as "sons of god," and that it wouldn't have been strange at all for Jesus to say he was a son of god. Now imagine if 'a' and 'the' had somewhere been transposed.
of course, this is just something I had heard, and it doesn't explain why such a fuss would have come from a simple transposition, so if you want to destroy this notion go ahead. i wont take it pesonally. -Pf Mageth, thanks for clarifying a bit. |
12-20-2004, 12:52 PM | #8 |
Moderator -
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
|
In context, "Son of Man" and "Son of God" are not claims to divinity anyway.
"Son of Man" (or Son of Adam) was an idiomatic way to say "human being." Daniel called the Messiah "One like a son of man" (meaning that the Messiah would be a human being) and somewhere along the line, the phrase became a way to allude to the Messiah but it's pretty hard to tell if any "Son of Man" sayings in the gospels are authentic to Jesus (assuming he exsted at all) and even if they are, whether he meant them to be self-referential or titular or whether he meant them be sayings about people in general. "Son of God" was used to refer to people who were chosen or favored by God and was associated especially with Kings. I personally don't believe that Jesus ever claimed to be the Messiah or the King of the Jews (which were really the same claim) but even if he did, those were still not assertions of personal godhood. |
12-20-2004, 12:52 PM | #9 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 220
|
In the Gospel of John Jesus refers to himself as the Son or the Son of God in at least the following places: 3:16-18; 5:25; 9:35; 10:36; 11:4. In 10:36, he says
Quote:
|
|
12-20-2004, 12:53 PM | #10 | |
Moderator -
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|