FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-10-2007, 08:49 PM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default How probable is it that Jesus said what the Gospels say that he said?

I look forward to reading comments from readers.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 05-10-2007, 09:38 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
Posts: 748
Default

I think it is at least safe to assume that Jesus never said any of the stuff he is reported to have uttered in John's Gospel, otherwise at least SOME of those comments (and they're some of Jesus' best material!) would have found their way into the Synoptic gospels.
Roland is offline  
Old 05-10-2007, 09:56 PM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: an inaccessible island fortress
Posts: 10,638
Default

100% probable, sure thing.

Jesus is, after all, a fictional character who only exists in these stories called “The Gospels.” So the dialogue the character speaks in the story is the dialogue he speaks.
Just as it’s 100% sure thing that “Rick” said, “This could be da start of a beautiful friendship” or Tarzan said “Ungowa!!!”
Biff the unclean is offline  
Old 05-11-2007, 02:19 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post
I look forward to reading comments from readers.
Assuming he was real, I'd say there is no possibility he said all of them.

Figuring out which ones he did say depends on a lot of assumptions in addition to his mere existence. That is why scholars who assume he was real cannot agree on which quotations are authentically his.
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 05-11-2007, 03:32 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,210
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post
I look forward to reading comments from readers.
Biff and Doug have covered most of the ground above. I'd also add a third possibility: some of the sayings attributed to "Jesus" might well be things spoken by sundry "Christ" entities seen in sundry "visions" by sundry mystics, starting with Paul and others contemporary with him.

(I suppose this could be counted as a branch of fiction, but it's not fiction in the normal sense - i.e. it wouldn't have been deliberately made up, but would be a delivery of the unconscious, or whatever the correct explanation for such things turns out to be.)
gurugeorge is offline  
Old 05-11-2007, 04:06 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roland View Post
I think it is at least safe to assume that Jesus never said any of the stuff he is reported to have uttered in John's Gospel, otherwise at least SOME of those comments (and they're some of Jesus' best material!) would have found their way into the Synoptic gospels.
Really? But it is even clear at times in the synoptics that even those close to Jesus miss a lot of what he says and don't even understand what they do hear.

One might argue that only John , and maybe Judas even get much of what is going on at times.
judge is offline  
Old 05-11-2007, 11:06 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
Posts: 748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by judge View Post
Really? But it is even clear at times in the synoptics that even those close to Jesus miss a lot of what he says and don't even understand what they do hear.

One might argue that only John , and maybe Judas even get much of what is going on at times.
Do you mean to say that Matthew, Peter (the supposed source for Mark), and the "researcher" Luke ALL missed or couldn't understand the "I am" statements accredited to Jesus in John?

I find that highly incredible. :huh:

A far more plausible explanation is that whoever wrote "John" made up quotes that he felt accurately reflected the Jesus he believed in.

I should probably make it clear at this point that I am merely playing devil's advocate here, since I basically believe that Mark created the fiction and the other three took it from there.
Roland is offline  
Old 05-11-2007, 12:40 PM   #8
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: California
Posts: 359
Default

Much of what he is reputed to have said in the synoptics is straight out of the scroll of Pharisaical teachings. Lots of people were saying it. So if Jesus was based on an actual person, as I think likely, he may well have said some of what is attributed to him.

:wave:
Gracchus is offline  
Old 05-11-2007, 02:39 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roland View Post
Do you mean to say that Matthew, Peter (the supposed source for Mark), and the "researcher" Luke ALL missed or couldn't understand the "I am" statements accredited to Jesus in John?
Maybe. Maybe the sources were just unaware of this incident. Maybe they didn't understand the signifigance. Maybe they were troubled by it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roland View Post
I find that highly incredible. :huh:
Why, what do you think it meant?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roland View Post
A far more plausible explanation is that whoever wrote "John" made up quotes that he felt accurately reflected the Jesus he believed in.
Heretic :Cheeky:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roland View Post
I should probably make it clear at this point that I am merely playing devil's advocate here, since I basically believe that Mark created the fiction and the other three took it from there.
That's lucky.
judge is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:43 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.