FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-05-2006, 06:39 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: oz
Posts: 1,848
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yalla
I have seen elsewhere that Iganatius has been dated, like Polycarp, to c160 ce.
Spin had a post about it IIRC.
Something to do about 2 princes.
I'll check.

Oh, and this is a link to a writer who states that all the letters of Ignatius are forgeries from a later time.

http://www.fullbooks.com/The-Ignatia...-Spurious.html

So there are a few possibilities.
cheers
yalla
http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.p...us#post1839820

This is a link to the post referred to above.
It muddies the water a little with respect to the alleged date of Ignatius.
cheers
yalla
yalla is offline  
Old 08-05-2006, 10:30 AM   #12
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 416
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman
Ignatius was a fourth century literary profile for Eusebius
along with the rest of all references to christianity prior to the appearance of Constantine.
All the patristic writers were fictitious? Is Andy Kaufman your source for this?

Didymus
Didymus is offline  
Old 08-05-2006, 11:12 PM   #13
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Didymus
All the patristic writers were fictitious? Is Andy Kaufman your source for this?

Didymus
It is an hypothesis which may be tested, in regard to the patristic
writers into whom Eusebius interpolated references to this "tribe
of christians" in the pre-Nicaean epoch, starting with Josephus
and ending --- after a couple of hundred years, and perhaps a
hundred detailed fictions --- with Origen, Porphyry and Pamphilus.

All this was because Constantine wanted a ROman church, and
wanted the lands, treasures, gold and kudos of the ancient and
traditional Greek (Hellenic) religions.


Pete Brown
mountainman is offline  
Old 08-06-2006, 04:10 AM   #14
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
All this was because Constantine wanted a ROman church, and
wanted the lands, treasures, gold and kudos of the ancient and
traditional Greek (Hellenic) religions.
Did he? His capital was Constantinople - not Rome! He was the Emperor - he had all the treasure etc!

And you are forgetting the continual thorn in the flesh of all Romans, the Persians.

(Off topic, but I really cannot see how Islam took off in a world of very powerful Byzantine and Persian Empires. The empires were very used to the hordes from outside - the Great Wall of China was built because of this issue, the Persians and Romans had coped with this for millenia - the Persians were using horse riding and bow technology techniques originally from the mongols! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Carrhae)
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 08-06-2006, 11:00 PM   #15
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle
Did he? His capital was Constantinople - not Rome! He was the Emperor - he had all the treasure etc!
Much of the traditional treasures and temples of the Hellenic religion
were not accessible to Constantine. They had not been directly
accessible to any of the preceeding emperors, because they were
managed (so to speak) by the (Hellenic) pagan "priests".

Constantine created a new and strange ROMAN religion, and
thus was in a position to deprive the ancient traditions of their
treasures and temples and lands, almost overnight, and did so,
during his reign. The gold was used to melt into gold coins, and
much of it paid for the construction of christian basilicas, and for
the construction of Constantinople.

Other gold was handed over to "the barbarians" as pacts of peace,
on the borders of the ROman empire, along with automatic admission
to christianity. He literally paid his (some of his external) enemies to
become christians, with no strings attached.


Quote:
And you are forgetting the continual thorn in the flesh of all Romans, the Persians.
How am I forgetting the Persians, and Shapur?



Pete Brown
mountainman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:57 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.