FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-21-2004, 02:58 PM   #11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warthur
So what you're saying then, Magus, is that because we as a people have gone to war, we are immediately disqualified from ever calling any war in the past "wrong" or "immoral"?

Even if we, personally, disagree with the wars that our leaders have committed our nations to?

exactly, as if i was responsible or for the killing of hundreds of thousands of native americans, or millions of jews, or protestants!
widowvirgin is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 03:10 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by widowvirgin
so then the god of the bible is not the same god for christians?
The god depicted in the Hebrew Bible became the god depicted in the collection of books Christians call "The New Testament" through faith regardless of any apparent discrepancies in the depictions.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 03:13 PM   #13
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13
The god depicted in the Hebrew Bible became the god depicted in the collection of books Christians call "The New Testament" through faith regardless of any apparent discrepancies in the depictions.
what do you mean by "discrepancies in the depictions?"
widowvirgin is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 03:13 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warthur
So what you're saying then, Magus, is that because we as a people have gone to war, we are immediately disqualified from ever calling any war in the past "wrong" or "immoral"?

Even if we, personally, disagree with the wars that our leaders have committed our nations to?
Not necessarily, but I still don't think you're in a position to judge the morality or lack thereof of a war that took place 3000 years ago based on nothing more than reading a chapter in a book about it.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 03:15 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by widowvirgin
i never said it was immoral. in fact all stated was what was in the bible. and yes it was genocide, genocied means "a systematic destruction of a racial or CULTURAL group." the battle of jericho seems pretty systematic to me, don't you think?
Define systematic. I guess we could conclude that Harry S. Truman is guilty of genocide then?
Magus55 is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 03:24 PM   #16
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
Define systematic. I guess we could conclude that Harry S. Truman is guilty of genocide then?
now we're back in reading class.

systematic: a definate scheme or method of procedure or classification.

pardon my stupidity, but could you refresh my mind on the truman thing please.
widowvirgin is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 03:50 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by widowvirgin
now we're back in reading class.

systematic: a definate scheme or method of procedure or classification.
I know what it means, I just wanted to see what context and definition was intended.

Quote:
pardon my stupidity, but could you refresh my mind on the truman thing please.
Truman ordered the deliberate incineration of over a hundred thousand civilian men, women, and children ( aka, the Atom bombs).
Magus55 is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 03:59 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by widowvirgin
what do you mean by "discrepancies in the depictions?"
Portrayals that are significantly different (ie a blood-thirsty god vs a loving god).
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 09:01 PM   #19
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
Its the Battle of Jericho. For one its not genocide, since its one city, and we aren't exactly foreign to the concept of war and killing, and as such, aren't really in a position to judge it as immoral.
Deuteronomy 20:16-18....

However, in the cities of the nations the LORD your God is giving you as an inheritance, do not leave alive anything that breathes. Completely destroy them - the Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites - as the LORD your God has commanded you. Otherwise, they will teach you to follow all the detestable things they do in worshiping their gods, and you will sin against the LORD your God.


That's what I'd call genocide! God is telling them to kill all those people including the infants, and all because he is afraid that the Hebrews might learn to worship other gods from these people. Like the infants will teach them about the foreign gods and practices!

I love that great circular argument that christians use about god's morality. It goes something like this... The reason we know that god is perfect is because he has such great morals and is completely just. And if you think something this allegedly perfect god does is not moral, then we you are wrong because we mere humans are not qualified to judge the morals of god.



Quote:
I still don't think you're in a position to judge the morality or lack thereof of a war that took place 3000 years ago based on nothing more than reading a chapter in a book about it.
Well that's exactly what you are doing! You are ASSUMING that a war that took place 3000 years ago is moral just because it is allegedly ordered by a god that you assume is perfect without any evidence except by reading a chapter in a book about it.

Presumably, you would agree that god gave us brains so we would not fall for "false gods" among other things. Well, one of the best ways to judge the various gods to choose from is to judge their morals. If we automatically assumed every "god" had perfect morals, instead of actually using our mind, we would never know which "god" was the "true" god.

Not only does the christian god have questionable morals, but he can't even make up his mind. In the OT, he thinks it's OK to massacre whole tribes so you can avoid turning to other gods. Then in the NT you are supposed to "love your enemies."
Kilgore Trout is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 09:30 PM   #20
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
Define systematic. I guess we could conclude that Harry S. Truman is guilty of genocide then?

....Truman ordered the deliberate incineration of over a hundred thousand civilian men, women, and children ( aka, the Atom bombs).
Truman didn't order the killing of ALL the Japanese. God ordered the killing of ALL the Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites. And we were being attacked by the Japanese, so they were a real threat to our lives. The Hebrews were the ones who were attacking the other tribes. Not because there was a threat to their lives, but because god didn't want the Hebrews to follow their ways. He must have made a great impression on the Hebrews if he's that scared of them following other gods.

I guess it would never occur to you that just about every time some country or tribe attacks another country or tribe, they use the excuse that god is on their side, and the other guys are scum that god hates. That's probably what the Japanese did in WWII and it's what the Muslim terrorists do, but when it's in the bible, that's somehow OK.
Kilgore Trout is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:56 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.