FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-01-2006, 11:49 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
Default

Christ, as a typical mystic, identified himself with Beingness, the Father. Paul is guilty of a degree of theomorphizing.
No Robots is offline  
Old 09-01-2006, 02:55 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 3,103
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mageth View Post
So?.

ordinarily i would not care, but the op asked a question, i was responding to
"Assuming Jesus existed, is there evidence in the bible that he thought he was God incarnate? Did he say so?"

gnosis92 is offline  
Old 09-01-2006, 05:44 PM   #13
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 10,955
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by praxeus View Post
Colossians 2:9
For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

1 Timothy 3:16
And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness:
God was manifest in the flesh,
justified in the Spirit,
seen of angels,
preached unto the Gentiles,
believed on in the world,
received up into glory.

Colossians 1:19
For it pleased the Father that in him should all fulness dwell

Philippians 2:5-7
Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:
Who, being in the form of God,
thought it not robbery to be equal with God:
But made himself of no reputation,
and took upon him the form of a servant,
and was made in the likeness of men:

There are alexandrian corruptions in the Timothy and Philippians verses.
The one in Timothy weakens the Deity of Messiah in perhaps
the single most powerful Messiah verse in the NT.

Shalom,
Steven Avery
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Messianic_Apologetic

Well, we have shifting goals here.

Is the topic post asking whether the texts as we have them indicated that Jesus identified himself as divine. The answer is yes.

It seems now the topic has slipped into, are those passages "original" or part of some later redaction. The answer to this is nobody knows and nobody can ever say.

We take historical texts as we get them, not as we want them.

I would note that if Jesus had not claimed his status as diety, you would have expected Peter and James (both witnesses to Jesus's ministry) to have made some protest to Paul's clear claims that he was God. Indeed, you would have expected a flurry of epistles denouncing Paul's "perverson" of Jesus message. Not one such epistle exists nor is there any indication of any such disagreement. So either (a) it didn't happen because Peter and James heard Jesus claim his own divinity or (b) the Christian federal police hunted down every ms that ever existed evidencing this purported disagreement and destroyed them.

Which is more likely?
Gamera is offline  
Old 09-01-2006, 06:38 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,579
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamera View Post
It seems now the topic has slipped into, are those passages "original" or part of some later redaction. The answer to this is nobody knows and nobody can ever say.

We take historical texts as we get them, not as we want them.
Would that be the royal "we" ?


Quote:
I would note that if Jesus had not claimed his status as diety, you would have expected Peter and James (both witnesses to Jesus's ministry) to have made some protest to Paul's clear claims that he was God.
Indeed, you would have expected a flurry of epistles denouncing Paul's "perverson" of Jesus message.
Jesus as a Jew would have had no idea how to claim his status as diety. Nor did Paul made this claim for the "man" Jesus, with whom he wanted no truck (1 Cor 2:2). Peter and James (Z) did not keep in touch with Paul and even if they thought his gospel perverse (it was only preached to Gentiles), they would not have likely entered into intellectual exchanges with him. Being illiterate village folk, they would have possessed no theological arguments to stand up to Paul's.

Quote:
Not one such epistle exists nor is there any indication of any such disagreement. So either (a) it didn't happen because Peter and James heard Jesus claim his own divinity or (b) the Christian federal police hunted down every ms that ever existed evidencing this purported disagreement and destroyed them.
Which is more likely?
Neither is nearly as likely as (c) Jesus did not claim to be divine, and heavy redaction of earlier traditions about him did take place in the gospels

Jiri
Solo is offline  
Old 09-01-2006, 06:48 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Lansing, Michigan
Posts: 4,243
Default

Don't you think that forgiving sins is a pretty significant action for a first century Jew?
buckshot23 is offline  
Old 09-01-2006, 06:49 PM   #16
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 10,955
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solo View Post
Would that be the royal "we" ? :rolleyes
:

No, its the scholarly "we." We get texts as they come to us. A text is a text. It exists. Everything else is just speculation.

Quote:
Jesus as a Jew would have had no idea how to claim his status as diety.
What evidence do you have of this? The idea that because one is a Jew it would be impossible for one to claim diety seems absurd on its face. For instance, a madman who was a Jew might make the claim. Or a diety who was a Jew might make the claim. The condition of being a Jew simply doesn't preclude the result, unless you use circular reasoning.

Quote:
Nor did Paul made this claim for the "man" Jesus, with whom he wanted no truck (1 Cor 2:2). Peter and James (Z) did not keep in touch with Paul and even if they thought his gospel perverse (it was only preached to Gentiles), they would not have likely entered into intellectual exchanges with him. Being illiterate village folk, they would have possessed no theological arguments to stand up to Paul's.
Paul's claim to Jesus' divine status is amply evidence in his epistles.

As to Peter and James, it was a small world back then. The idea that Paul could have been preaching that Jesus was God and Peter and James knew nothing about it seems very unlikely.

Peter may have been semi-literate. James clearly was not. He appears to be a well-read Helenized literate Jew from what little we know of him. In any case, the fact remains that they were witnesses and you can sight no evidence whatsoever that they disagreed with Paul's verson of Jesus.

Quote:
Neither is nearly as likely as (c) Jesus did not claim to be divine, and heavy redaction of earlier traditions about him did take place in the gospels
And you base that on what? Why is it less likely Jesus claimed that he was God than that others claimed he was? We know that latter occured and that itself is a farfetched claim. So if Paul made such a farfetched claim, why couldn't Jesus? Are you just assuming Paul is farfetched and Jesus isn't? Based on what?
Gamera is offline  
Old 09-01-2006, 06:52 PM   #17
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 10,955
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by buckshot23 View Post
Don't you think that forgiving sins is a pretty significant action for a first century Jew?
Well, the detractors have to claim these are all interpolations, redactions, and fabrications of very creative authors, who harmonized their work in wonderful ways, and then disposed of the unharmonized mss, in one of the greatest police actions in history.

Matthew 9:2 - And behold, they brought to him a paralytic, lying on his bed; and when Jesus saw their faith he said to the paralytic, "Take heart, my son; your sins are forgiven."

Matthew 9:5 - For which is easier, to say, 'Your sins are forgiven,' or to say, 'Rise and walk'?

Mark 2:5 - And when Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralytic, "My son, your sins are forgiven."

Mark 2:9 - Which is easier, to say to the paralytic, 'Your sins are forgiven,' or to say, 'Rise, take up your pallet and walk'?

Luke 5:20 - And when he saw their faith he said, "Man, your sins are forgiven you."

Luke 5:23 - Which is easier, to say, 'Your sins are forgiven you,' or to say, 'Rise and walk'?

Luke 7:48 - And he said to her, "Your sins are forgiven."
Gamera is offline  
Old 09-01-2006, 07:39 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Nazareth
Posts: 2,357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skepticgirl View Post
Assuming Jesus existed, is there evidence in the bible that he thought he was God incarnate? Did he say so?
JW:
No, but his Jewish mother thought he was. Even as a Member of the Loyal Opposition though I have to confess that based on Observation and Experience Jesus currently seems to have exactly the same amount of power as God.



Joseph

http://www.errancywiki.com/index.php/Main_Page
JoeWallack is offline  
Old 09-01-2006, 09:14 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The recesses of Zaphon
Posts: 969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeWallack View Post
Jesus currently seems to have exactly the same amount of power as God.
Does that mean he could be stopped with chariots of iron?
Loomis is offline  
Old 09-01-2006, 09:23 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The recesses of Zaphon
Posts: 969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skepticgirl View Post
Assuming Jesus existed, is there evidence in the bible that he thought he was God incarnate? Did he say so?
If the Jesus character was supposed to be God incarnate then wouldn’t there be a few episodes where he flew on the backs of cherubs and blew smoke out his nostrils?
Loomis is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:12 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.