FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-04-2009, 06:05 AM   #151
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyro View Post
But even if there was no anti-Christian edict of Severus, as Historia Augusta states, would a Christian really have been a watchman in Rome during the reign of Severus?
Why not?
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 07-04-2009, 06:12 AM   #152
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: US
Posts: 90
Default

Since, according to Tertullian, Christians weren't liked?
Tyro is offline  
Old 07-04-2009, 06:37 AM   #153
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bordeaux France
Posts: 2,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huon View Post
Chrysos = gold gonos = born Chrysogonos = born from gold
Thanks Huon.

What about the term "Chrysargyron"?
arguros, silver. Chrysargyron is an alloy of gold and silver, in variable proportions. The price of gold in the antiquity was about 15 times the price of silver. Some dishonest goldsmiths would try to sell chrysargyron instead of pure gold. But this trick was well known. The density of pure silver is 10.49 and the density of pure gold is 19.3, almost twice as much. It was also possible to mint false coins in chrysargyron. The kings did not like that...
Huon is offline  
Old 07-05-2009, 05:30 AM   #154
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyro View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
I think you may be committing an anachronism. Just because Christianity came to be hated by some in the 2nd century, does not imply it was hated by all in the first century. I see no conflict whatsoever in the idea that a 1st century Roman watchman was a Christian.
The inscription is dated to 205 CE.
I think I've lost track of the thread. I thought we were discussing the inscription referenced in the OP, generally dated to the early 1st century.
spamandham is offline  
Old 07-05-2009, 04:08 PM   #155
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: US
Posts: 90
Default

In ErĂ­k Zara's article two inscriptions are mentioned, Jucundus Chrestianus and Herennius Chrestianus.
Tyro is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:39 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.