FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-28-2004, 02:10 PM   #1
fta
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oceania
Posts: 334
Default Authenticity of Paul's Epistles?

Is there any general concensus today on how many of Paul's letters are actually "genuine"?
fta is offline  
Old 11-28-2004, 03:45 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fta
Is there any general concensus today on how many of Paul's letters are actually "genuine"?
There isn't really a fully agreed consensus.

However almost all modern scholars regard Romans 1 Corinthians 2 Corinthians Galatians Philippians 1 Thessalonians and Philemon as authentic.

The great majority do not regard the pastoral epistles (ie 1 Timothy 2 Timothy and Titus) as authentic.

Colossians Ephesians and 2 Thessalonians are more disputed, probably a majority regard Colossians and 2 Thessalonians as authentic and Ephesians as inauthentic but there is nothing like a consensus.

(Practically nobody regards Hebrews as by Paul but then it never claims to be by Paul anyway.)

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:59 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.