Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
12-13-2010, 07:22 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 5,187
|
The Bible Has No Errors!
Compared with what?!...
|
12-13-2010, 08:08 AM | #2 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
What is it that you want to discuss? Those who claim that the Bible has no errors make an absolute statement, not that the Bible is more accurate than any other literature of its type, but that it has no errors.
|
12-13-2010, 08:23 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 5,187
|
Yes, but how would you confront a scholar teaching that the Bible has no errors without him offering a gauge to calibrate the piece?
Compare the Bible to what? If I compare it to the Qur'an, the Bible has many errors; if I compare the Qur'an to the Bible, the Qur'an is saturated with errors. One strong argument is that the Bible is without errors ONLY in the original. How would you resolve the impasse? |
12-13-2010, 08:25 AM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,702
|
reality?
|
12-13-2010, 08:54 AM | #5 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Quote:
The Bible is a product of failable humans. Some people refuse to accept that obvious fact for reasons that have nothing to do with logic, so it's hard to argue with them. |
|
12-13-2010, 09:46 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 5,187
|
Some Statements of Faith put it that the Scriptures ARE [present tense] without error in the original.
Sure a church member could sue the leader for cheating and lying. There is no "original" anywhere in this planet, and never was. Now, is it not offensive to go to such a church and still help it with your cash? |
12-13-2010, 10:06 AM | #7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,305
|
Quote:
As R. Hillel supposedly said: "That which is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow. That is the whole Torah; the rest is commentary". If people actually tried to follow this principle would there be any holy wars or cultural conflicts? I don't see why we should assume that older versions of the scriptures would be any 'better'. They might be incomprehensible, or just boring. Then there's the question of bibliolatry, worshipping an artifact. |
|
12-13-2010, 09:33 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 5,187
|
|
12-13-2010, 09:49 PM | #9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 9,233
|
The bible is incomporable.
It has no errors since it was divinely inspired by an transcendent, immanent, omnipotent, benevolent, infallible, omniscient, omnipresent god. Therefore there can be no comparison between it and anything produced by mere, fallible humans. Next question. |
12-13-2010, 09:58 PM | #10 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Albuquerque. SW USA
Posts: 3,176
|
Why does it contain so many contradictions and inaccuracies, then?
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|