FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-13-2010, 07:22 AM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 5,187
Default The Bible Has No Errors!

Compared with what?!...
Julio is offline  
Old 12-13-2010, 08:08 AM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

What is it that you want to discuss? Those who claim that the Bible has no errors make an absolute statement, not that the Bible is more accurate than any other literature of its type, but that it has no errors.
Toto is offline  
Old 12-13-2010, 08:23 AM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 5,187
Default

Yes, but how would you confront a scholar teaching that the Bible has no errors without him offering a gauge to calibrate the piece?
Compare the Bible to what?
If I compare it to the Qur'an, the Bible has many errors; if I compare the Qur'an to the Bible, the Qur'an is saturated with errors.
One strong argument is that the Bible is without errors ONLY in the original.
How would you resolve the impasse?
Julio is offline  
Old 12-13-2010, 08:25 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,702
Default

reality?
cycomiko is offline  
Old 12-13-2010, 08:54 AM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Julio View Post
....
One strong argument is that the Bible is without errors ONLY in the original.
How would you resolve the impasse?
I don't regard that as a strong argument. It claims that there is an imaginary Bible that we can't read that is free of errors, so any error in the Bible we can read doesn't count, and the Bible is still error free.

The Bible is a product of failable humans. Some people refuse to accept that obvious fact for reasons that have nothing to do with logic, so it's hard to argue with them.
Toto is offline  
Old 12-13-2010, 09:46 AM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 5,187
Default

Some Statements of Faith put it that the Scriptures ARE [present tense] without error in the original.
Sure a church member could sue the leader for cheating and lying.
There is no "original" anywhere in this planet, and never was.
Now, is it not offensive to go to such a church and still help it with your cash?
Julio is offline  
Old 12-13-2010, 10:06 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Julio View Post
Some Statements of Faith put it that the Scriptures ARE [present tense] without error in the original.
Sure a church member could sue the leader for cheating and lying.
There is no "original" anywhere in this planet, and never was.
Now, is it not offensive to go to such a church and still help it with your cash?
I agree that inerrancy is indefensible, but it's a bit of a non-sequitur to tie this to church membership, which is typically a social experience as much as a theological one.

As R. Hillel supposedly said: "That which is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow. That is the whole Torah; the rest is commentary". If people actually tried to follow this principle would there be any holy wars or cultural conflicts?

I don't see why we should assume that older versions of the scriptures would be any 'better'. They might be incomprehensible, or just boring. Then there's the question of bibliolatry, worshipping an artifact.
bacht is offline  
Old 12-13-2010, 09:33 PM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 5,187
Default

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RB3g6...mbedded#at=168
Julio is offline  
Old 12-13-2010, 09:49 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 9,233
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Julio View Post
Compared with what?!...
The bible is incomporable.

It has no errors since it was divinely inspired by an transcendent, immanent, omnipotent, benevolent, infallible, omniscient, omnipresent god. Therefore there can be no comparison between it and anything produced by mere, fallible humans.

Next question.
Jaybees is offline  
Old 12-13-2010, 09:58 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Albuquerque. SW USA
Posts: 3,176
Default

Why does it contain so many contradictions and inaccuracies, then?
seyorni is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:21 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.