Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
View Poll Results: Who won the "Is Genesis Historically False" debate | |||
Constant Mews won | 128 | 97.71% | |
AFDave won | 2 | 1.53% | |
It was a tie | 1 | 0.76% | |
Voters: 131. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
07-29-2007, 10:04 PM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tower of Babel
Posts: 557
|
I'm still a fan of Daves narrow view of creation but just to clear the record, I did not vote in favor of afdave. I am a babelist at heart and Dave's notion of 'the truth of written record' is completely wrong under that assumption. His aggruments were very pursuasive but CM was able to counter all of them. This what you would expect if God had and STILL IS confusing the tongues of mankind (and thier so called scientific papers) in order that we not 'know' the truth of heaven.
|
07-29-2007, 10:11 PM | #32 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Altadena, California
Posts: 3,271
|
Quote:
|
|
07-29-2007, 10:20 PM | #33 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A pale blue oblate spheroid.
Posts: 20,351
|
Quote:
|
|
07-29-2007, 11:29 PM | #34 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,027
|
Quote:
Best alert the pope, so he can shut down his little operation before God smites him nigh unto coffee grounds. |
|
07-30-2007, 02:13 AM | #35 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 1,057
|
So I voted, but honestly I don't think a poll was necessary this time (other to make poor dave cringe ). Dave deliberately avoided answering CM's question about consillience; and, by doing so, admitted defeat. I'd love to see him argue otherwise.
|
07-30-2007, 08:41 AM | #36 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: California
Posts: 1,395
|
Exactly. I remain interested in how Dave rationalizes to himself not addressing the question. I see two possibilities: he genuinely doesn't understand the problem; or he cannot address it because he is incapable of constructing his own arguments, and none of his creationist sites has attempted to do so.
His blatant accusation that every scientist alive is a fraud and a liar is, of course, too ridiculous to entertain. |
07-30-2007, 09:15 AM | #37 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Altadena, California
Posts: 3,271
|
I did see that Dave was on a couple of hours ago, but left no comments.
Could it be that the steady drip, drip, drip of data has made a mark on lithified crania? Can credulous Dave be considering the calamitous concept of Creationist calumny? Tune in tomorrow — same Bat-time, same Bat-channel. |
07-30-2007, 09:24 AM | #38 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: California
Posts: 1,395
|
Quote:
|
|
07-30-2007, 09:25 AM | #39 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: United States east coast
Posts: 58
|
Quote:
As you well know, CM, emotions rule the intellect. Those of us whose emotions run to challenging authority and finding things out for ourselves have a leg up on scientific understanding. Incomprehensible to those with contrary (authoritarian) dispositions. Makes the world go around, apparently. |
|
07-30-2007, 09:32 AM | #40 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Bloomington, MN
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
Er, excuse me, not scared -- rather, God has opened his eyes that it's a waste of time to argue with Satan's minions. Or something to that effect. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|