Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-07-2006, 05:29 AM | #1 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
MJ and the Second Coming
Is the concept of the second coming actually an acknowledgement that Jesus had not dwelt amongst us that was warped by the historicists from an earlier natural yearning that the Lord who had sacrificed himself in heaven for their sins ought to hurry up and set up the new heaven and earth that all the xians wanted?
Ie it was originally a first coming? |
01-07-2006, 06:30 AM | #2 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
|
Quote:
|
|
01-07-2006, 02:06 PM | #3 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Now now, isn't it clear that the MJ position has a sacrifice in is it the third heaven? Have you missed all the threads about in the flesh? I doubt it!
I'm attempting a thought experiment. Does the second coming become a first coming if you accept the MJ position as a starting point? Are there any comments in the NT that would support this, or be neutral about it or contradict it? |
01-07-2006, 02:19 PM | #4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
|
Quote:
|
|
01-07-2006, 04:19 PM | #5 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Quote:
All I am attempting is a bit of occam, a bit of weeding, to see if we assume an Mj, does the second coming become a first coming? These diversionary tactics about which heaven - as its all made up there probably isn't a clear definition - are great fun, but why not have a sect of messianic judaism make up something about sins being washed away in heaven and the messiah coming to build the new Jerusalem after the Romans had made such a mess - twice - around 70 and 130? |
|
01-07-2006, 05:26 PM | #6 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
|
Quote:
Anyway, I apologise for the diversion. You've raised an interesting question actually, but I'm not an MJer, so I'll stay out of this. (I'll just point out that where you place Christ's crucifixion - sub-lunar realm or supra-lunar realm - may prove relevent to the question at some stage). |
|
01-08-2006, 05:16 AM | #7 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Come on everyone, someone must have a view on this!
Assume an MJ. Does all the stuff about come Lord Jesus, I come quickly etc make sense if they were talking about a first coming - as some Jews still do? |
01-08-2006, 05:21 AM | #8 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Quote:
|
|
01-08-2006, 05:31 AM | #9 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Quote:
Someone must have done a similar chart of the various heavens - nerds had to do something before computer programming, the internet and trains were invented! |
|
01-09-2006, 03:44 AM | #10 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
|
Quote:
1. When Paul and the other Christians are transformed and go to meet Christ in the air, it will be a Second Coming. 2. When Christ reaches the earth, it will be a First Coming. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|