Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-28-2005, 01:56 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Watertown, SD
Posts: 44
|
Biblical Sinning: Is one sin worse than another?
Is eating pork any worse than killing somebody according to the Bible?
They are both sins. But are they equal? I don't mean morally either btw. Straight biblical speak here... |
07-28-2005, 01:57 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,043
|
Depends on the circumstances of the killing.
|
07-28-2005, 04:55 PM | #3 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Monroeville, Ohio, USA
Posts: 440
|
yes, it is not a good idea to kill your brother. that is explicitly pointed out in Cain and Abel. Eating pork is like having sex with a gentile. The gentiles were pigs on the animal hierarchy and they would not allow the Hebrews to circumcise them, which cirumcision meant the removal of the penis (instead of the foreskin) and walla! the gentile girls were not fair game for the Hebrews! This refusal of submission did not allow the Hebrews to "eat" the pork. Anybody who reads King James can surmise that the honey Jonathan ate was one of Saul's wives. When we get to the woman at the well, she kept her calendar by the moon (moon god sin) and, therefore she was a sinner. Jesus, as a twelve year old left his lunar family and chose a "father" who was a gentile solarist (kept a solar calendar). When Jesus sold this belief to his older sister (Jesus had two sisters and five brothers and they were all full siblings) Martha, who was the wife of Simon Magus (Lazuras) she got the word out. Jesus said he who is not a sinner (does not use the lunar calendar) let him cast the 1st stone! Simon Magus had the rank of a number 5 which is as high as a Samaritan can go, therefore, Martha had five husbands, that is, a #5 for a husband.
|
07-28-2005, 06:25 PM | #4 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Big State in the South
Posts: 448
|
Quote:
I truly don't understand where you're getting this from. Can you explain this more? and how did you come to the conclusion of the lunar calendar, solar calendar, and this interpretation? Boomeister |
|
07-28-2005, 06:29 PM | #5 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Big State in the South
Posts: 448
|
I'm not sure where they get "all sins are equal before the Lord" kind of thinking.
There is situational ethics all through the Old Testament. There is choosing the lesser of two evils, as well. Abraham and Sarah lied about their marriage and claimed to be brother and sister, in order to not get killed. People were stoned for violating laws...which means sometimes killing was seen as okay. Was pork treated as the same as killing someone? I guess it depends on who was eating the pork and who the victim of the killing were. Boomeister |
07-29-2005, 01:52 AM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 2,817
|
From what I've heard from some thiests on this forum, it pretty much somes down to this:
Mankind is evil and deserves to be punished. God is just. Therefore God must punish us for being evil. (I'd add commentary here about how God was the one who supposedly made us, so that any flaws we have are what he put in us, but for the sake of the point I'll refrain this time.) However, by stroking God's ego properly, one can avoid this punishment by virtue of an act of human sacrifice that may or may not have happened 2000 years ago. Humanity is evil and depraved from the get-go, so there is no point in differentiating between eating pork or murdering someone. All that is just window-dressing. As long as you kiss the God ring properly, all is forgiven. And people wonder why I think the Christian faith is seriously ill... |
07-29-2005, 10:39 AM | #7 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 421
|
zachhanke;
Quote:
Thinking along this line; if you kill somebody - what you ate for dinner is irrelevant. There's more to this, but just to start off... gee |
|
07-29-2005, 04:47 PM | #8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,043
|
Quote:
|
|
07-29-2005, 05:24 PM | #9 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Monroeville, Ohio, USA
Posts: 440
|
Quote:
Jesus Christ did exist, was crucified in A.D. 33 and survived. He died in A.D. 70 and was 77 years old. As a twelve year-old Child he was 24 years old chronology wise. the book of John is all about "Time" and it was written 1st. Jesus' prediction of the "fall of Jerusalem" was not about the Jewish War of A.D. 66 but about "his" Jerusalem that was invaded by Caiaphas and Pilate in A.D. 33. His six hours of darkness was about an intercalation to correct the solar year. If you have an extra six-hours of darkness every Spring Equinox you do not need a leap-year every four years. and who the hell is Ben Franklin and Daylight Savings Time? |
|
07-30-2005, 09:09 AM | #10 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 421
|
Wallener;
Quote:
Having said that; Matthew 14:19 I think is still relevant here; (eating pork and washing hands while good hygenic practices, weren't the most important point in my view.) "......out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder......" Being hygenic while killing someone doesn't do you any good (or the person you're killing). gee |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|