FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-09-2008, 01:12 PM   #91
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
Message to sugarhitman: Please summarize or update your previous explanations regarding why God predicts the future. God's motives for doing what he does is a very important issue.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman
You say something?
What do you mean? A few weeks ago, I forget in which thread, I asked you why God predicts the future. I have forgotten what your reply was. That is why I asked you to summarize or update your previous explanations. Although I do not recall what you said, I remember that what you said did not make any sense. Unless you can come with some good reasons why God predicts the future, you lose.

Since God broke his promise to give Egypt to Nebuchadnezzar, it is already reasonably established that God is a liar, or at least that he is needlessly deceptive and deliberately causes confusion.

May I ask what good prophecies are to people who do not have access to them? Millions of people died without having any knowledge of the God of the Bible.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 01:36 PM   #92
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southwest USA
Posts: 42
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post
Hey didnt you star in Star Trek?
Does your question about Bill Shatner's career mean that you don't have any type of relevant response to my post?

Or would you keep the subject changed and babble about how Kirk kicked the crap out of a man in a rubber lizard suit?
Bill Shatner is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 02:34 PM   #93
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack the Bodiless
BTW, if you still think the Bible is "filled with many prophecies about the destruction and restoration of the Nation of Israel", try looking through the Book of Revelation (the book that supposed to be all about the "End Times"), and see where it talks about the restoration of the nation of Israel.

It doesn't.

That's why the advocates of "prophecy" need to go back to those books written or edited around the time of the Babylonian Exile and its aftermath: when the people of Israel actually DID come home.
Wrong again my friend (as usual) Revelations is all about Israel.
Maybe you should actually try reading it sometime?

It's not very long. So it shouldn't take you long to find out that nowhere in Revelation is Israel restored.

In case you weren't aware of this: the Zionists were Jews, and Jews don't use Revelation (the fact that it's in the New Testament should give you a clue as to why). They had to drag verses out of what you'd call the "Old Testament", but Revelation wouldn't have helped them anyhow.
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 03:13 PM   #94
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Message to sugarhitman: You are not actually as interested in Bible prophecy as you assume you are. It the Bible predicted that God will send everyone to hell, you would reject it. On the other hand, I would not accept the Bible even if it said that God will send everyone heaven for the same reasons that I do not accept it now, but I would hope that the claim was true. Not only do I not believe that God will send some people to hell, but I would not accept the Bible even if it said that God will send everyone to heaven, although I would hope that he would. If the Bible said that God will send everyone to heaven, I would not accept it for the same reasons that I do not accept it now. Following are some of my reasons for not accepting the Bible now:

1 - The Gospel writers were anonymous.

2 - The Gospel writers almost never revealed who their sources were.

3 - The Gospel writers almost never claimed that they witnessed miracles.

4 - The Gospel writers almost never revealed who their sources were.

5 - Matthew and Luke borrowed a good deal from John.

6 - It impossible to be reasonably certain how many people saw Jesus after he supposedly rose from the dead.

7 - Today, millions of Christians disagree as to what constitutes a miracle healing. There are not any good reasons for anyone to assume that it was any different back then.

If the Bible said that God will send everyone to heaven, I would still question why God injures and kills people and innocent animals with hurricanes. Unlike you, it is not my position that doing some good things justifies injuring and killing people and innocent animals, or setting up circumstances that cause people and innocent animals to be killed.

I would still question God's unmerciful desire to send skeptics to hell for eternity without parole.

As much as I would like to rubber stamp everything that God does in order to go to heaven, my morals are not up for negotiation, and I am not able to do anything about that. The only possible solution for me would be if God explained to my satisfaction why he does what he does. It is my position that a loving God, a God who I would admire and accept, would provide me with explanations for his behavior before I made up my mind whether to accept him or reject him, especially if spending eternity in heaven or hell were at stake.

So there you have it. While my beliefs would be consistent no matter what the Bible promised, you will only accept promises that you believe will ultimately benefit you. You have replaced logic and reason with emotional perceived self-interest.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:28 PM   #95
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The temple of Isis at Memphis
Posts: 1,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post
Hi guys, i'm baaaaaccccck
Will you be answering questions this time? You failed to do so last time around.

Quote:
Some of the authors still have not either paid attention to my answer, or just isn't looking for one.
Everyone saw your response. Unfortunately it wasn't an answer to a question that anybody was asking.

So once again: explain how this was not a conditional promise, when apparently the Israelites lost parts of the land based upon their behavior (i.e., they failed to satisfy a condition).

Quote:
But I will once again repeat why Israel was not able to recieve all the promise.
Which refutes your claim that it was an unconditional land promise.
Sheshonq is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:38 PM   #96
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Message to sugarhitman: Please reply to my posts #90, #91, and #94.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 01-10-2008, 02:43 AM   #97
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by martini View Post
if i may interject, Israel becoming a nation (once again?) cannot be a fulfilled prophecy in any normal sense of the word.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour...ration_of_1917
Balfour Declaration of 1917 (dated November 2, 1917) was a classified formal statement of policy by the British government on the partitioning of the Ottoman Empire in the aftermath of World War I.

The letter stated the position, agreed at a British Cabinet meeting on October 31, 1917, that the British government supported Zionist plans for a National home for the Jewish people within Palestine‎ with the condition that nothing should be done which might prejudice the rights of existing communities there.

The statement was issued through the efforts of Chaim Weizmann and Nahum Sokolow, the principal Zionist leaders based in London but, as they had asked for the reconstitution of Palestine as “the” Jewish national home, the Declaration fell short of Zionist expectations.[1]
if the opening poster does not realize why this is so, please read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-fulfilling_prophecy

so Christian governments decided that the Jews should have Israel restored ... just like it reads in their favorite mythology. THAT is prophecy come to pass? THAT is what we are supposed to accept as the work of God? it looks -- and i do not have my glasses on -- a lot like the work of MAN just as so very many OTHER religious events and texts do.

telling the world that i will have a new car one day and then buying one a decade from now can hardly be said to be fatidic. :wave:



Who cares of how the restored nation of Israel came into being. The fact is that it has. Revelation and OT endtime prophecies cannot come about unless this nation (with Jerusalem being the center of these prohecies which is the most important piece of real estate in the Messianic prophecies) is restored. For years people brushed off these prophecies until the impossible happned....the restoration of the Nation of Israel. And I am amazed how people call this a "self-fulfilling prophecy" as if though Israel did not encounter any outside resistance. The fact of the matter is that the Jews had to fight for that land against overwhelming odds and forces. The arabs, Brits, the U.N. and all nations has pressured that nation since its birth to give up land that it won in the Arab-Israeli wars (The Arabs had German officers training and supplying them). Jerusalem was not given to the Jews (Jerusalem is the most important part of prophecy) they took it in the war. And even today the nations are determined to wrest it out of their hands. "Self-fulfilling prophecy" how absurd this view is....especially with all the blood on both sides being spilled over this land. Such is the mind of one who is deceived. :wave:
sugarhitman is offline  
Old 01-10-2008, 03:18 AM   #98
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

Sugarhitman: what part of THIS WAS NEVER PROPHESIED IN REVELATION do you not understand?

Have you EVER read the Bible?

Why don't you try providing CHAPTER AND VERSE for this "prophecy", and see what the Bible actually says?
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 01-10-2008, 03:33 AM   #99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post
Message to sugarhitman: You are not actually as interested in Bible prophecy as you assume you are. It the Bible predicted that God will send everyone to hell, you would reject it. On the other hand, I would not accept the Bible even if it said that God will send everyone heaven for the same reasons that I do not accept it now, but I would hope that the claim was true. Not only do I not believe that God will send some people to hell, but I would not accept the Bible even if it said that God will send everyone to heaven, although I would hope that he would. If the Bible said that God will send everyone to heaven, I would not accept it for the same reasons that I do not accept it now. Following are some of my reasons for not accepting the Bible now:

1 - The Gospel writers were anonymous.

2 - The Gospel writers almost never revealed who their sources were.

3 - The Gospel writers almost never claimed that they witnessed miracles.

4 - The Gospel writers almost never revealed who their sources were.

5 - Matthew and Luke borrowed a good deal from John.

6 - It impossible to be reasonably certain how many people saw Jesus after he supposedly rose from the dead.

7 - Today, millions of Christians disagree as to what constitutes a miracle healing. There are not any good reasons for anyone to assume that it was any different back then.

If the Bible said that God will send everyone to heaven, I would still question why God injures and kills people and innocent animals with hurricanes. Unlike you, it is not my position that doing some good things justifies injuring and killing people and innocent animals, or setting up circumstances that cause people and innocent animals to be killed.

I would still question God's unmerciful desire to send skeptics to hell for eternity without parole.

As much as I would like to rubber stamp everything that God does in order to go to heaven, my morals are not up for negotiation, and I am not able to do anything about that. The only possible solution for me would be if God explained to my satisfaction why he does what he does. It is my position that a loving God, a God who I would admire and accept, would provide me with explanations for his behavior before I made up my mind whether to accept him or reject him, especially if spending eternity in heaven or hell were at stake.

So there you have it. While my beliefs would be consistent no matter what the Bible promised, you will only accept promises that you believe will ultimately benefit you. You have replaced logic and reason with emotional perceived self-interest.


Being convinced that God exists means nothing "for even the demons believe that" It is to trust and LOVE God that matters and not just belief. And by some of your earlier statements and accusations against this Holy God, i cant but help to think that should you ever become convinced of His existence your obvious hate for him would only grow. Just like Pharoah who was convinced that God indeed existed (indeed he was convinced) his heart grew harder and harder against God.

I did not come to this site to convert the unconvertable. But rather to defend The Truth that is being attacked. Because who knows maybe some young believer who may not know enough of the Word stumble upon this site and become filled with doubt because of some rantings by a hard nosed ignorant critic, may be comforted by my defenses and others.


Critics like to complain that there is not enough or no evidence to support the Gospels (but yet they believe island Tyre was sieged by Nebby which there is no history to back this claim) heck much of history of anything is incomplete or non-existant. It takes faith to believe in secular history as well as Biblical history for the simple fact NONE OF US TODAY WAS THERE TO WITNESS THESE HISTORICAL EVENTS (unless the critics have a time machine, which I seriously doubt). History is subject to manipulations which anyone should now know by secular and Religious historians alike (like the lie that Columbus sailed exploring lands to convert the heathen. But in reality it was to explore for gold and extend that power of the Unholy Roman Church. People may never know the whole truth for the reasons behind world war 1 and 2 Vietnam etc. Official history is usually incomplete or just outright lies).

The history of their own beliefs are filled with little or no evidence or history, like Evolution or Paganisim. To cut it short the walk of a christian is in faith....just like anybody else who choose to believe anything produced by the past. :wave:
sugarhitman is offline  
Old 01-10-2008, 03:44 AM   #100
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman
Being convinced that God exists means nothing "for even the demons believe that" It is to trust and LOVE God that matters and not just belief. And by some of your earlier statements and accusations against this Holy God, i cant but help to think that should you ever become convinced of His existence your obvious hate for him would only grow. Just like Pharoah who was convinced that God indeed existed (indeed he was convinced) his heart grew harder and harder against God.
Your ignorance of your own Bible keeps tripping you up. According to the story, Pharaoh wanted to let the Hebrews go, but God intervened and "hardened his heart" to stop him doing so (because God wanted an excuse to perpetrate various atrocities on the defenseless people of Egypt).

So you're saying that God makes us into unbelievers? Possibly because he wants to toss us into Hell? Swell guy!

As for the rest of your post: it's just dribble. You've lost.
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:16 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.