FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-01-2008, 01:26 PM   #11
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central Europe
Posts: 118
Default

Quote:
you just make a general claim and it's up to the person reading it to fill it up with content depending on the symbolic aura surrounding the claim...
this should really be taught in elementary school, the whole astrology, psychics , talking to the dead people, bible freaks and all kind of rubbish would be considerably reduced.

blame the schools...
AtheistVirus is offline  
Old 04-01-2008, 01:30 PM   #12
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by funinspace View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post

um, the Ottomans considered themselves to be the inheriters of the Byzantine Roman empire. And they are the people who once made up the Eastern Roman emipre. The Roman empire was mainly Latin and Greek. Um you do realize that Russia or the USSR is a European power as well as was the Ottomans right? The Europeans and the Romans are the same.
And everyone is part of the same human race. Your super generalization does as much damage to your own argument, and makes it pretty meaningless.


Wow, that is quite the counter argument! Uh, care to say anything intelligent?

Quote:
Care to try again?
Why, you didn’t say anything beyond generalized blather…
So are you saying that the Ottomans did not inherit the Byzantine empire? Are you saying that the Byzantine empire wasnt once part of the Roman empire. Is not Russia also not European. Who controls Russia? Europeans.

Super genaralization? I dont think you even believe that obvious dumb arguement.
sugarhitman is offline  
Old 04-01-2008, 01:33 PM   #13
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AtheistVirus View Post
Quote:
you just make a general claim and it's up to the person reading it to fill it up with content depending on the symbolic aura surrounding the claim...
this should really be taught in elementary school, the whole astrology, psychics , talking to the dead people, bible freaks and all kind of rubbish would be considerably reduced.

blame the schools...
The difference is that psychics and astrologers comes no where near to doing what the prohets of Israel has done. So sorry you cannot group bible prophets with these occult frauds.


And Na, na , na na na you cant disprove it,
sugarhitman is offline  
Old 04-01-2008, 01:35 PM   #14
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central Europe
Posts: 118
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post
And Na, na , na na na you cant disprove it,
So basically, Japanese will all go to hell...:crying:
AtheistVirus is offline  
Old 04-01-2008, 01:41 PM   #15
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AtheistVirus View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post
And Na, na , na na na you cant disprove it,
So basically, Japanese will all go to hell...:crying:
Be of good cheer....not all of them.
sugarhitman is offline  
Old 04-01-2008, 01:52 PM   #16
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC Canada
Posts: 396
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post

The difference is that psychics and astrologers comes no where near to doing what the prohets of Israel has done. So sorry you cannot group bible prophets with these occult frauds.

But Muhammad had over a dozen fulfilled prophechies and even more signs that tell of the coming of the last day that have 'come true.' I ask you again, why are you not praising Allah and bowing before him? Heck, they even call Muhammad "The Prophet." Can you disprove the prophecies of Muhammad?


LL
Lazarus Long is offline  
Old 04-01-2008, 01:55 PM   #17
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman
Critics demand evidence.......
Why does the Bible contain 100% disputable prophecies? If Jesus had predicted when and where some natural disasters would occur, month, day, and year, few people who have disputed that he was able to predict the future. If Jesus had done that, surely more people would have become Christians. Historically, many people have accepted all kinds of religions based upon much less convincing evidence than that. In addition, Nostradamus and Edgar Cayce attracted lots of followers based upon a lot less convincing evidence than that.

Micah 5:2 says:

"But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting."

Obviously, Jesus did not become ruler in Israel. If Micah had predicted that the messiah would rule a heavenly kingdom instead of an earthly kingdom like Micah misled the Jews to believe, and had predicted that the messiah would heal people, that the messiah would be crucified, buried, and rise from the dead in three days, that Pontius Pilate would become the Roman governor of Palestine, and that Herod would become the King of Judea, surely lots more Jews have believed that Jesus was the messiah. Why do you suppose that the vast majority of Jews have always rejected Jesus?

If fact, prophecy is one of the greatest proofs that the God of the Bible does not exist. No loving, rational God would ever make any disputable prophecies when he could easily make 100% indisputable prophecies.

If you had been taken as a baby and had been raised by Muslim parents in Iran, you would probably reject Bible prophecy today. If that had happened, why would that have been the case? Wouldn't you still have wanted to know what the truth is under those conditions? Under those conditions, you would have demanded evidence that the Bible is true, and you would have rejected the same evidence that you accept now. Is wanting to know the truth the most important factor regarding finding the truth, or what worldview a person's parents have, and where a person lives?

Is it your position that God is not able to provide addition evidence that would convince more people to love and accept him, or that he is not willing to do so?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 04-01-2008, 01:58 PM   #18
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazarus Long View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post

The difference is that psychics and astrologers comes no where near to doing what the prohets of Israel has done. So sorry you cannot group bible prophets with these occult frauds.

But Muhammad had over a dozen fulfilled prophechies and even more signs that tell of the coming of the last day that have 'come true.' I ask you again, why are you not praising Allah and bowing before him? Heck, they even call Muhammad "The Prophet." Can you disprove the prophecies of Muhammad?


LL
Um the Quran was written AFTER Muhammed, wheares the bible was written way before Jesus. And give me a specific world prophecy from the Quran. (the Quran is nothing more than a whats that word? plagarist??? book.) So sorry these prophecies of the Quran does not even began to hold a candle to those of the bible....and you very well know it.
sugarhitman is offline  
Old 04-01-2008, 02:02 PM   #19
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 47
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post
Lets start with Daniel ch. 2. Nebucahdnezzar has a dream of a statue that was made of different metals in this order.

1. Head of gold
2. Chest and arms of silver
3. Stomach and thighs of brass
4. Legs of iron
5. Toes mixed with iron and clay

Daniel says these metals in chronological order represents 4 kingdoms that would rise upon the earth, he tells Nebby that it starts with his kingdom.
As noted above, and here, the book of daniel itself has many historical as well as possible authorship problems, so I wouldn't consider it a valid source for such matters.


Quote:
The only kingdom to arise after divided Rome is the kingdom of Christ which Daniel clearly predicts. I have often wondered what Christ meant when He said "Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand" after studying Daniel I knew....Repent, for the kingdom of God is the next and final kingdom after Rome! This explains why the Apostles even referred to their time as the last days...we have been in the last days since the death and ressurection of Christ.)
Saying that the only kingdom to arise after divided rome is "the kingdom of Christ" doesn't make any sense. There have been plenty of unrelated, yet significant "kingdoms" between then and now. The Aztec Empire, The Kingdom of England, The Kingdom of Denmark, and plenty others.


Quote:
The prophecies concerning Israel causes much damage to those who claim their is no evidence and that biblical prophecies are fraudelent or writen before the events. I will not go deep on this one but prophecies related to Israel are these:

1. Israel destroyed by the Romans and scattered abroud throughout the world as the prophets foretold thousands of years before.
2. Israel restored in the last days one of the signs that mark the end of the end times.
3. A dispute over the land of Israel and Jerusalem between Israel and the surrounding nations.
4. Aremegeddon, the day when all nations will seek to destroy the Jews and Israel.
5. Their Messiah returns to save them from this destruction

All except the 4th has most certainly come true, right in front of our very eyes......which brings me to my conclusion....Prophecy is PROOF of GOD'S EXISTENCE.
You are clearly suffering from confirmation bias here. You also seem to be using the tried and true method of prophecy, the law of large numbers! As long as one in a million prophecies come true, you're right! Anything that isn't true can just be assumed to happen in the future.


Quote:
"REMEMBER THE FORMER THINGS OF OLD: FOR I AM GOD, AND THERE IS NONE LIKE ME, DECALARING THE END FROM THE BEGINNING, AND FROM ANCIENT TIMES THE THINGS THAT ARE NOT YET DONE, SAYING MY COUNSEL SHALL STAND, AND I WILL DO ALL MY PLEASURE."----GOD


The text makes it clear (as well as fulfillment) that God proves Himself by Prophesy. There is no other belief system with this kind of evidence....I know not one. :wave:
I go out on a limb here and say Islam has just as many "fulfilled" prophecies as Christianity.
ChairmanMeow is offline  
Old 04-01-2008, 02:03 PM   #20
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman
Critics demand evidence.......
Why does the Bible contain 100% disputable prophecies? If Jesus had predicted when and where some natural disasters would occur, month, day, and year, few people who have disputed that he was able to predict the future. If Jesus had done that, surely more people would have become Christians. Historically, many people have accepted all kinds of religions based upon much less convincing evidence than that. In addition, Nostradamus and Edgar Cayce attracted lots of followers based upon a lot less convincing evidence than that.

Micah 5:2 says:

"But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting."

Obviously, Jesus did not become ruler in Israel. If Micah had predicted that the messiah would rule a heavenly kingdom instead of an earthly kingdom like Micah misled the Jews to believe, and had predicted that the messiah would heal people, that the messiah would be crucified, buried, and rise from the dead in three days, that Pontius Pilate would become the Roman governor of Palestine, and that Herod would become the King of Judea, surely lots more Jews have believed that Jesus was the messiah. Why do you suppose that the vast majority of Jews have always rejected Jesus?

If fact, prophecy is one of the greatest proofs that the God of the Bible does not exist. No loving, rational God would ever make any disputable prophecies when he could easily make 100% indisputable prophecies.

If you had been taken as a baby and had been raised by Muslim parents in Iran, you would probably reject Bible prophecy today. If that had happened, why would that have been the case? Wouldn't you still have wanted to know what the truth is under those conditions? Under those conditions, you would have demanded evidence that the Bible is true, and you would have rejected the same evidence that you accept now. Is wanting to know the truth the most important factor regarding finding the truth, or what worldview a person's parents have, and where a person lives?

Is it your position that God is not able to provide addition evidence that would convince more people to love and accept him, or that he is not willing to do so?
Youre right the prophecies of the Messiah have not been fulfilled....but you do realize that the prophets foretold His death and return.....so boooo weak arguement (which is typical Johnny).
sugarhitman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:46 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.