FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-06-2004, 11:10 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Oakville
Posts: 20
Default Originality in Christian Dogma

I am wondering what in the Christian dogma is actually an original concept.
Many of the fundamental principals such as the virgin birth, the trinity, the resurection, heaven,creation, the soul are pilfered from various other religions and beliefs.
So what is original? Is the christian faith a clever compilation of the best that was out there?
roncuomo is offline  
Old 05-06-2004, 11:24 AM   #2
CX
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portlandish
Posts: 2,829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by roncuomo
I am wondering what in the Christian dogma is actually an original concept.
Many of the fundamental principals such as the virgin birth, the trinity, the resurection, heaven,creation, the soul are pilfered from various other religions and beliefs.
So what is original? Is the christian faith a clever compilation of the best that was out there?
I think the truly original and creative part of Xian theology is the concept of the atonement. Xians made that bit up out of whole cloth and it is in large part responsible for the success and growth of Xianity.
CX is offline  
Old 05-06-2004, 12:05 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Oakville
Posts: 20
Default

The idea of atonement, of offering a sacrifice to atone for a sin or transgression is an ancient concept. In reading Kersey Graves, " The World's Sixteen Crucified Saviors", he mentions both Burmese and Hindoo traditions of the ultimate atonement....the sacrificing of a god.
The progresion of sacrifice from fruits and vegetables to animals to humans reaches it's zenith with the offering of a god.
roncuomo is offline  
Old 05-06-2004, 12:37 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

NOTICE:

Kersey Graves is not an authority, and any assertion derived from the Worlds 16 Crucified Savors must be backed up with other sources. Please read Richard Carrier's essay here:

Kersey Graves and The World's Sixteen Crucified Saviors (2003)

Thank you for your attention.
Toto is offline  
Old 05-06-2004, 12:56 PM   #5
CX
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portlandish
Posts: 2,829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by roncuomo
The idea of atonement, of offering a sacrifice to atone for a sin or transgression is an ancient concept. In reading Kersey Graves, " The World's Sixteen Crucified Saviors", he mentions both Burmese and Hindoo traditions of the ultimate atonement....the sacrificing of a god.
The progresion of sacrifice from fruits and vegetables to animals to humans reaches it's zenith with the offering of a god.
See Toto's notice vis-a-vis Kersey Graves and definitely read the Carrier article. While the concept of offerings to gods is fairly common the creativity of the earliest Xians was in taking the Jewish concept of a sin offering, substituting Jesus for the pascal animal and making a once and for all atonement for everyone past, present and future. It served the dual purpose of creating a metaphysical system which would have wide appeal and explaining the embarassing circumstances of Jesus ignominious demise. Personally I find it a brilliant bit of theological gymnastics.
CX is offline  
Old 05-06-2004, 01:04 PM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 10,532
Default

From CX:
Quote:
It served the dual purpose of creating a metaphysical system which would have wide appeal and explaining the embarassing circumstances of Jesus ignominious demise. Personally I find it a brilliant bit of theological gymnastics.
It is also an extraordinary appeal to masochism, which under conditions when one must endure suffering (as all poor people do), would make it extremely attractive.

RED DAVE
RED DAVE is offline  
Old 05-06-2004, 02:16 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RED DAVE
It is also an extraordinary appeal to masochism, which under conditions when one must endure suffering (as all poor people do), would make it extremely attractive.
I don't really see it as any more or less appealing than many other religions, just lucky. It was in the lands that happened to be the ones that did the conquering/exploring about that time in history so it was brought along for the ride.
Craig is offline  
Old 05-06-2004, 02:53 PM   #8
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 323
Default

Kersey Graves be damned, atonement is by no means original. Death has been a romantic concept since forever.

I would say Christians took the worship of a would-be historical character to the extreme, but they have competition there, too.

So, no. Nothing in Christianity is original. Maybe Jesus having long hair. I dunno.
Al Kafirun is offline  
Old 05-06-2004, 05:00 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Deep South
Posts: 889
Default

As best I can think the distinction between Christ and other sacrificial gods is that Christ died once and rose from the dead only once. It seems that the sacrifice of the god was tied to seasonal changes and so he was sacrificed and reborn yearly.

This in its self raises another distinction, that being that while Christ resurrected as his adult self the Pagan gods were reborn. This is so for many Neo-Pagan traditions and may not be true mythologically. I’ll have to study that one.

JT
Infidelettante is offline  
Old 05-06-2004, 05:05 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
Posts: 748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CX
See Toto's notice vis-a-vis Kersey Graves and definitely read the Carrier article. While the concept of offerings to gods is fairly common the creativity of the earliest Xians was in taking the Jewish concept of a sin offering, substituting Jesus for the pascal animal and making a once and for all atonement for everyone past, present and future. It served the dual purpose of creating a metaphysical system which would have wide appeal and explaining the embarassing circumstances of Jesus ignominious demise. Personally I find it a brilliant bit of theological gymnastics.
The thing that always makes me laugh is when Christians point with pride to the fact that the thing that allegedly separated Judaism from its neighbor religions is that the Isrealites didn't indulge in human sacrifice.

There's a rich irony in there somewhere!
Roland is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:13 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.