FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-28-2007, 02:23 PM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default Editing the New Testament

Gore Vidal has Julian commenting that xians are continually re - editing their writings.

Ok, is there any evidence of this?

What are the dates of the earliest manuscripts we have? What evidence do we have of amendment, deletion and insertion?

What level of trust can we put in the documents we have now? Are there bands of years over which books may have been amended?

For example Mark, originally written assume 60's, what about future editions? Origin of Species has changed for example.
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 04-29-2007, 12:58 AM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

I think that Celsus or some other early critic of Christianity made that charge against the Christians. I don't think you would necessarily find documentary evidence of it 2000 years later.
Toto is offline  
Old 04-29-2007, 02:54 AM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

But we have discussions here that this passage may have been inserted, I would have thought the limits, timelines would be discernable.
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 04-29-2007, 03:43 AM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

1) Isaac Newton's "A Historical Account of Two
Notable Corruptions of Scripture".

2) Arius 325 CE: "[God’s Son] is subject to alteration or change"

3) Evidence of perversion of the patristic literature?
mountainman is offline  
Old 04-29-2007, 01:48 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 701
Default

Mark had an ending added to it that included the resurrection appearances of Jesus. That's two versions of Mark.

Luke and Matthew are both re-writings of Mark. So we've got 4.

If Clement's Secret Mark is genuine, that's one more for sure and one possible beyond that.

So Mark existed in as many as 6 different versions.

For later changes, see Bart Ehrman, The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture.
robto is offline  
Old 04-29-2007, 04:18 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robto View Post
Mark had an ending added to it that included the resurrection appearances of Jesus. That's two versions of Mark.

Luke and Matthew are both re-writings of Mark. So we've got 4.
There is a big difference, unaccountably fudged more times than I can keep up with, between (A) using an existing work as a source in order to pass off the new work as your own and (B) editing an existing work in order to pass it off as belonging to the original author.

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 04-30-2007, 08:11 AM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

But has anyone constructed a family tree of documents, similar to the fossil record, showing where and how and why things fit together? There will be arguments, but it is very useful to outline the extent of the arguments.
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 04-30-2007, 09:17 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,307
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle View Post
But has anyone constructed a family tree of documents, similar to the fossil record, showing where and how and why things fit together? There will be arguments, but it is very useful to outline the extent of the arguments.
Yes. I once did a family tree for manuscripts of John 4.

Stephen
S.C.Carlson is offline  
Old 04-30-2007, 11:26 AM   #9
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Now we need someone to extend that into a full biblical genome project!
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 04-30-2007, 11:32 AM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancaster, CA.
Posts: 96
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle View Post
Gore Vidal has Julian commenting that xians are continually re - editing their writings.

Ok, is there any evidence of this?
Where did you get the information that Gore Vidal has Julian saying something? If you don't know, how can you be certain such a monster exists?

Quote:
What are the dates of the earliest manuscripts we have?
Ryland Papyri dates to like 150 a.d. or so. Even if the earliest is the Sinaiticus it is still earler than anything we have for any other classical literature such as Pliny, Josephus, Julius Caesar, et al.

Quote:
What evidence do we have of amendment, deletion and insertion?
If you don't know, maybe there isn't any. Even Bart Ehrman won't go that far.

Quote:
What level of trust can we put in the documents we have now?
High level of trust.

Quote:
Are there bands of years over which books may have been amended?
Books have been amended since the beginning. Ever hear of Marcion the Heretic? He edited his canon to just Pauline Epistles, the Gospel of Luke, and deleted every semetic reference. As such his view was discarded very early.

Quote:
For example Mark, originally written assume 60's, what about future editions? Origin of Species has changed for example.
Origin of Species was a hypothosis that was later recanted by the author. To my knowledge Mark never recanted his views about Christ.
notapadawan is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:49 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.