Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-07-2006, 04:18 PM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A place in the Northern Hemisphere of Planet Earth
Posts: 1,250
|
Matthew, Mark, Luke, John
A lot of skeptics claim that the Gospels are pure fiction because of all the miracles that are claimed in the Gospels. They also say that nobody outside of the Bible wrote about these alleged miracles to confirm them.
But here's my question, Do you think Matthew one day just decided to make up a person named Jesus and look through the Old Testament and create a man he claims to have fulfilled every prophecy? If this was the case, why are there no writings to dispute this in the first century? If I write a story right now claiming a man rose from the dead, I would not be believed at all. How did Matthew manage to convince everyone Jesus was real if he made him up and Jesus did not exist? If you say Jesus did exist, why didn't anyone refute what Matthew has written? If there were no miracles, surely people would have written that Matthew is a big liar, right? Who would believe this? So, If Jesus did not exist what inspired Matthew to make up a person and try to fool everyone? What would he gain out of this? If Jesus did exist, where is the refutation? Why did the Romans not produce Jesus' body and announce, "Jesus is dead here is the proof!" Why were these things not done? |
01-07-2006, 04:43 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
|
Well, the problem is that, from a non-Christian perspective, we can't be sure who wrote Matthew--or any other NT work, for that matter.
Skeptics argue that the teachings of some man, or perhaps many men, were repeated and augmented over many years. As this happened, it is plausible that the stories about this man or these men were exaggerated and expanded. The stories snowballed and became popular among the people, who gathered together into formal churches. Leaders exchanged letters, some of which were copied and redistributed as authoritative. Eventually, as the churches expanded further, the stories themselves were written down, copied and distributed. Perhaps immediately, or possibly over a long period of time, these "Gospels," as well as the authoritative Epistles, were attributed to people who knew Jesus. Or, maybe as the stories gained popularity, some people made claims that they had known this fictionalized man. There are any number of possibilities. |
01-07-2006, 04:56 PM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A place in the Northern Hemisphere of Planet Earth
Posts: 1,250
|
Well, why aren't there churches for the other people who claimed to be the Messiah? There were many people running around claiming to be the Messiah. Where are their churches?
|
01-07-2006, 05:01 PM | #4 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 103
|
Quote:
|
|
01-07-2006, 05:02 PM | #5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Quote:
|
|
01-07-2006, 05:04 PM | #6 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Quote:
|
|
01-07-2006, 05:17 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
|
Quote:
|
|
01-07-2006, 05:40 PM | #8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the torture chambers of Pinochet's Chile
Posts: 2,112
|
Quote:
|
|
01-07-2006, 06:23 PM | #9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,037
|
Martin, Abraham, and John...Anybody here seen...
Quote:
|
|
01-07-2006, 06:30 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|