FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-28-2003, 09:15 AM   #31
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
Default

Not to totally tangent this, there were presidents of the Continental Congresses--first and second. They did not count as presidents of the US--which was not declared until the end of the Second Continental Congress.

Trying to keep this relevant . . . well it demonstrates how precise history has to be. The only reason I can make the statements above is because we have the documentation. In the case of biblical history, the documentation just is not there.

--J.D.
Doctor X is offline  
Old 12-28-2003, 10:03 AM   #32
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Monroeville, Ohio, USA
Posts: 440
Default

Thank you very much Doctor X (and Bob K). I am sure that lots of people think I make things up. Your response to my former response indicates that I am not some wierdo spaceman. My goal is to be "thought" provoking as opposed to provoking. I often have "hoof-in-mouth" and am embar(assed) to have to answer.

My apologies for going off topic, and, you have taught me a great deal.
offa is offline  
Old 12-28-2003, 10:12 AM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 6,471
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by offa
Your response to my former response indicates that I am not some wierdo spaceman.
Nah. One example is a contention, two is an argument, and three is proof.

So far, the assertion that you aren't some wierdo spaceman is only a contention.

d
diana is offline  
Old 12-28-2003, 05:26 PM   #34
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Monroeville, Ohio, USA
Posts: 440
Default

that was sweet. My son, usaf ssgt hupp, is stationed in Baghdad.
offa is offline  
Old 12-29-2003, 01:07 PM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,562
Default

Quote:
Toto
You can probably show that his reasons for being sure that there was a historical Jesus are wrong (especially if he starts out arguing from the calendar) but there is not enough data to prove that Jesus did not exist. And that's what it is going to come down to
Actually it would be nice to state the reasons for doubting the story as Christians are taught and in particular reasons for doubting the existance of Jesus.
NOGO is offline  
Old 12-30-2003, 12:45 PM   #36
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Silicon Valley, Calif., USA
Posts: 2,270
Default From back in the OP:

Quote:
Originally posted by diana
There are basically three camps here:

1. The bible is true and Jesus Christ is Lord.

2. The bible is embellished after the fact and a well-meaning man named Jesus was elevated to god-like status decades after his death.

3. The bible is fiction and Jesus never existed.
I belong to a fourth camp:

4. Jesus really existed, buit he was a cult leader like David Koresh, one of several self-proclaimed "Christs" who cashed in on a kind of "messiah fever" prevalent in Israel during the mid-1st century C.E.. The Jewish splinter-cult of Jesus would have faded into historical obscurity had it not been for Paul, who (A) roamed around establishing new "branch chruches" for the cult, and (B) allowed gentiles to become cult members.
tracer is offline  
Old 12-31-2003, 11:33 AM   #37
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, oregon, usa
Posts: 1,190
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by offa
I heard on radio the other day that George Washington was not our first president and that he was about the fourth.
George Washington was the first President of the United States of America to be elected under the provisions of the newly adopted and ratified Constitution.

Yes, there were earlier "presidents", those being the men who presided over the Continental Congress during the war and those who presided over the convening of the representatives of the Confederation. Remember, the United States existed as a free nation for nine years under the Articles of Confederation... before the Constitution was written, promulgated, argued over and adopted.

Quote:
The others who held that post were erased by George's compatriots.
"Erased"? Meaning what? It sounds like you're saying George had hits put out on anybody who held the title "president".... Nothing has been "erased." There's more than sufficient historical evidence, if you're willing to look for it.

godfry
godfry n. glad is offline  
Old 12-31-2003, 05:15 PM   #38
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,562
Default

Quote:
There are basically three camps here:

1. The bible is true and Jesus Christ is Lord.

2. The bible is embellished after the fact and a well-meaning man named Jesus was elevated to god-like status decades after his death.

3. The bible is fiction and Jesus never existed.
I would suggest this as a forth camp.

Different books of the New Testament speak of different kinds of Jesus Christs. In some cases he is a man, in another case he is a spirit possessing a man and in still other cases he is a spirit with no man. Take you pick.
NOGO is offline  
Old 01-01-2004, 01:19 PM   #39
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 2,436
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by NOGO
I would suggest this as a forth camp.

Different books of the New Testament speak of different kinds of Jesus Christs. In some cases he is a man, in another case he is a spirit possessing a man and in still other cases he is a spirit with no man. Take you pick.
Those DO appear to absolutely fall into either 1 or 2 above. yes.

Nope, no fourth camp yet, IMO. (edited to add: "Tracer's" fourth camp idea gets my vote for a good possible fourth, now that I've finished reading this thread.

Happy New Year!!
Stephen
Phineas Flapdoodle is offline  
Old 01-01-2004, 01:38 PM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 6,471
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by phineasf Nope, no fourth camp yet, IMO. (edited to add: "Tracer's" fourth camp idea gets my vote for a good possible fourth, now that I've finished reading this thread.

Happy New Year!!
Stephen
If y'all check the link I gave on the first page to Peter Kirby's review of the different positions, you'll see there are, technically, far more than three camps.

d
diana is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:16 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.