FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-07-2004, 07:50 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
Default Dever: Propagandist for Reason

My review of Bill Dever is now up, here. Comments welcome, I am in an evil mood.
Quote:
This review is dedicated to those enamoured by William G. Dever's two recent books, What did the biblical writers know & When did they know it? (2001) and Who were the Early Israelites and Where did they come from? (2003). In polemical fashion, Dever attacks the minimalists and those who would lend credence to them (that is, Israel Finkelstein). In the first book, he argues that the minimalists (Davies, Whitelam, Lemche, Coote, Thompson, Ahlstrom, Grabbe, etc.) are "nihilists", "postmodernists", "deconstructionists", "skeptics", "revisionists", and so forth (and nearly "anti-Semitic"), saying that they believe that they believe no history is possible. He of course, argues that actually archaeology can shed light on the biblical record and affirm several basic facts (primarily, that historical Israel with real Israelites did exist at the time the books of Samuel and Kings say it did). In the second, he has toned down slightly, delivering a summary of archaeological evidence for the material culture of "proto-Israelites" and also giving a broad introduction and critique of several alternatives. He saves his vitriol for Finkelstein, and summarises with reasons why the Bible is typologically true (in the sense of Jews sharing a Passover heritage the way Americans "share" a Thanksgiving heritage).

I have no time to deal with all the contents of the books, but wish to examine a few examples to show why we need not pay attention to his propaganda, and why he should stick to his work instead. I have also been purposely polemical in return, since confident arrogance seems to be the method of the day in this debate. In rebuttal, I give several examples that clearly illustrate the straw-manning he is engaging in.
Celsus is offline  
Old 03-08-2004, 09:50 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
Default

Anyone? I thought quite a lot of people here like Dever...

Joel
Celsus is offline  
Old 03-09-2004, 07:07 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 4,666
Default

bob Dever? as in Gilligan?

Oh, that's Denver, not Dever. No idea who your guy is.
Dark Jedi is offline  
Old 03-09-2004, 07:56 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Dark Jedi
Oh, that's Denver, not Dever. No idea who your guy is.
In that case, pay no attention to my blather and go out and buy/read his books.

Joel
Celsus is offline  
Old 03-10-2004, 12:16 AM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

I think that Apikorus was a Dever fan, but I haven't seem him around lately.
Toto is offline  
Old 03-10-2004, 12:21 AM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
Default

It convinced me to pass on his work.

I am not persuaded by polemics.

--J.D.
Doctor X is offline  
Old 03-10-2004, 11:14 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Roanoke, VA.
Posts: 2,198
Default

Quote:
show why we need not pay attention to his propaganda, and why he should stick to his work instead.
I read Who Were the Early Israelites a couple months ago and found it pretty interesting. I agree that he needs to focus on the arguments and lay off the comments about his peers, but I thought the book was still worth reading. I've only recently gotten interested in biblical archaeology so I unfortunately don't have a lot of insight. Surely somebody else around here can provide more of a response. I read the book because I saw other people talk about it in this forum.
Postcard73 is offline  
Old 03-10-2004, 02:23 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
Default

Toto: I suggest we let Apikorus speak for himself. He was the first one to make me consider the minimalists.

Doctor X & Postcard73: I still say that Dever has an important contribution to make, even if it is clouded by his rhetoric. Both the books he's come out with recently are excellent if you ignore everything he has to say about the minimalists, and the rhetoric against Finkelstein (that leaves about 1/3rd of the material, probably). It was not the spirit of my review to turn people away from reading him: it was addressed to those who've read him and therefore dismissed minimalists out of hand, most of whom I've encountered here at II over the last few years.

Hold steady, we shall see more of him in a few minutes when I get Intro III up.

Joel
Celsus is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:16 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.