FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-17-2003, 04:19 PM   #11
Bede
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Layman
If God was going have theauthor write out Pi competely accurately the scribe would still be writing.
Absolutely not! If he was really an omnipotent God he would have rearranged the universe to make it a non-Euclidean space so that pi really did equal three. The fact he hasn't means he can't possibly exist.

B
 
Old 12-17-2003, 04:19 PM   #12
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fargo, ND, USA
Posts: 1,849
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by GakuseiDon
Actually, Goliath, your latest comments in the other thread are more worthy to go in there:
Yes, I suppose that dismissing me as a "village atheist" would be much easier than actually discussing the issues at hand, wouldn't it?

Quote:

How can anyone fight that???
Not my problem. I'm not a xian, remember?

Sincerely,

Goliath
Goliath is offline  
Old 12-17-2003, 04:23 PM   #13
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fargo, ND, USA
Posts: 1,849
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Vinnie
All measurements are approximations.
And the bible is allegedly perfect and therefore is to have no approximations.

Quote:

Its an absurd objection against the Bible.
It is a readily verifiable objection against the bible, so I have no idea how it can be called absurd.

Quote:

VASTDT...is all meant in good fun.
Why do I not believe you?

Sincerely,

Goliath

PS On a somewhat related note, even Archimedes had a better approximation for pi than 3.
Goliath is offline  
Old 12-17-2003, 04:25 PM   #14
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fargo, ND, USA
Posts: 1,849
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Layman
If God was going have theauthor write out Pi competely accurately the scribe would still be writing.
True. But the author of the verse in question didn't even state that it was an approximation. If the verse had said that the circumference of the pool was approximately three times its diameter, then we wouldn't be having this conversation now.

Sincerely,

Goliath
Goliath is offline  
Old 12-17-2003, 06:20 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Goliath
Yes, I suppose that dismissing me as a "village atheist" would be much easier than actually discussing the issues at hand, wouldn't it?
Well, I didn't call you a "village atheist", but I'm certainly willing to discuss the issues.

Quote:
Don >>> How can anyone fight that??? <<<

Not my problem. I'm not a xian, remember?
In this case, it doesn't matter. Your argument is a theological one, not a logical one. It is a statement of belief, which I'm usually not interested in arguing about. Still... You said:

"If this were any other ancient text, then such rounding would be acceptable, but this is the bible, whence rounding is absolutely inexcusable. Exact precision and accuracy is a must for the (alleged) word of an omnipotent, omniscient god."

I will grant that the word of God should be accurate, but why is rounding inexcusable for God? Is your objection based on logic or theology, e.g. Do you mean God is incapable of rounding? What if He wanted to round a number - would He be able to?
GakuseiDon is offline  
Old 12-17-2003, 06:43 PM   #16
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fargo, ND, USA
Posts: 1,849
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by GakuseiDon
Well, I didn't call you a "village atheist", but I'm certainly willing to discuss the issues.
Then why did you concede in the "Favorite biblical contradictions" thread?

Quote:

In this case, it doesn't matter. Your argument is a theological one, not a logical one.
No. Although it has to do with things in theology, it's still logical.

Quote:
I will grant that the word of God should be accurate, but why is rounding inexcusable for God? Is your objection based on logic or theology, e.g. Do you mean God is incapable of rounding? What if He wanted to round a number - would He be able to?
Certainly your god (if it exists) could round. However, since the bible is the instruction manual written by said god, it must be perfect. Therefore saying that pi is rational is inexcusable.

Amazing. I learned this stuff early in sunday school. You're a xian, why don't you know this stuff?

Sincerely,

Goliath
Goliath is offline  
Old 12-17-2003, 07:32 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
Default

Quote:
But, Vinnie, my favorite is "And I thought the Dutch Radicals were Bad".
My favorite comment (by myself) was this one:

"This person wouldn't know critical history if the entire Anchor Bible Reference Library were insterted into their kiester! But hey, maybe Christians did interpolate those, about 50 texts that we have from the time period...." :notworthy :notworthy :notworthy

Quote:
Yes, I suppose that dismissing me as a "village atheist" would be much easier than actually discussing the issues at hand, wouldn't it?
Firts, just so its noted, I did not dimiss your argument as such. I addressed it.

Quote:
True. But the author of the verse in question didn't even state that it was an approximation. If the verse had said that the circumference of the pool was approximately three times its diameter, then we wouldn't be having this conversation now.
This ignorance is elementary. All measurements by default are approximations. Its implicit in the statement itself.

Quote:
And the bible is allegedly perfect and therefore is to have no approximations.
If you define inspiration as free from numerical approximation you'd be correct. Unfortunately, your definition is not the accepted one.

Quote:
Why do I not believe you?
That question is not for me to answer.

Vinnie
Vinnie is offline  
Old 12-17-2003, 08:16 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Goliath
GDon: >>>Well, I didn't call you a "village atheist", but I'm certainly willing to discuss the issues.<<<

Then why did you concede in the "Favorite biblical contradictions" thread?
Because (IMHO) you had moved to theological, rather than logical grounds, by saying that God wouldn't round.


Quote:
GDon: >>>Your argument is a theological one, not a logical one.<<<

No. Although it has to do with things in theology, it's still logical.
OK.

Quote:
GDon: >>>I will grant that the word of God should be accurate, but why is rounding inexcusable for God? Is your objection based on logic or theology, e.g. Do you mean God is incapable of rounding? What if He wanted to round a number - would He be able to?<<<

Certainly your god (if it exists) could round. However, since the bible is the instruction manual written by said god, it must be perfect.
You see, God can either round, or not round.

God (if He exists) is perfect, so everything He does is an expression of His perfection. Thus, if God can round... then doesn't it follow that "rounding" is part of that perfection?

Quote:
Therefore saying that pi is rational is inexcusable.

Amazing. I learned this stuff early in sunday school. You're a xian, why don't you know this stuff?
I must have went to the wrong Sunday School... yours sounds like it was more fun!
GakuseiDon is offline  
Old 12-17-2003, 08:52 PM   #19
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fargo, ND, USA
Posts: 1,849
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Vinnie

This ignorance is elementary. All measurements by default are approximations. Its implicit in the statement itself.
But approximation is not perfection. The bible is supposed to be the perfect word of a perfect god, remember?

Quote:

That question is not for me to answer.
Just as well, I suppose. I really didn't expect you to try to answer it. I guess I have a hard time believing that your "village idiot"--erm, excuse me--"village atheist" page is in jest is because I have rarely seen you act even slightly civil towards me.

Sincerely,

Goliath
Goliath is offline  
Old 12-17-2003, 08:54 PM   #20
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fargo, ND, USA
Posts: 1,849
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by GakuseiDon
Because (IMHO) you had moved to theological, rather than logical grounds, by saying that God wouldn't round.
Okay...then why did you say:

Quote:

OK.
....? You seem to be filled with contradictions.

Quote:

You see, God can either round, or not round.
Correct.

Quote:

God (if He exists) is perfect, so everything He does is an expression of His perfection. Thus, if God can round... then doesn't it follow that "rounding" is part of that perfection?
No. Approximation is not perfection. Calling pi rational is not correct. Therefore, the bible is errant.

Quote:

I must have went to the wrong Sunday School... yours sounds like it was more fun!
It wasn't. I wasted far too many years of my life as a xian. When I think back to my days in that hate-filled religion, I honestly want to puke.

Sincerely,

Goliath
Goliath is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:17 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.